The prediction of particle and scalar transport in a complex geometry with turbulent flow driven by fans is considered. The effects of using different turbulence models, anisotropy, flow unsteadiness, fan swirl, and electrostatic forces on particle trajectories are shown. The turbulence models explored include kl, zonal kε/kl, and nonlinear eddy viscosity models. Particle transport is predicted using a stochastic technique. A simple algorithm to compute electrostatic image forces acting on particles, in complex geometries, is presented. Validation cases for the particle transport and fluid flow model are shown. Comparison is made with new smoke flow visualization data and particle deposition data. Turbulence anisotropy, fan swirl, and flow unsteadiness are shown to significantly affect particle paths as does the choice of isotropic turbulence model. For lighter particles, electrostatic forces are found to have less effect. Results suggest, centrifugal forces, arising from regions of strong streamline curvature, play a key particle deposition role. They also indicate that weaknesses in conventional eddy viscosity based turbulence models make the accurate prediction of complex geometry particle deposition a difficult task. Axial fans are found in many fluid systems. The sensitivity of results to their modeling suggests caution should be used when making predictions involving fans and that more numerical characterization studies for them could be carried out (especially when considering particle deposition). Overall, the work suggests that, for many complex-engineering systems, at best (without excessive model calibration time), only qualitative particle deposition information can be gained from numerical predictions.

1.
Gosman
,
A. D.
, and
Ioannides
,
E.
,
1983
, “
Aspects of computer simulation of liquid fuelled combustors
,”
J. Energy
,
7
, pp.
482
490
.
2.
Awolesi, S. T., and Kokkalis, A., 1991, “A case study on the application of measurements and computer simulation to the ventilation and airborne contaminants control within a workshop,” Proc. BEPAC Conf., pp. 1–6.
3.
Killingworth, D., Ong, I. B. S., and Whittle, G. E., 1991, “The application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in the design if clean rooms and process facilities,” Proc. Instit. Environ. Sci.
4.
Hall
,
R. C.
, and
Cowan
,
I. R.
,
1998
, “
Modelling atmospheric dispersion near buildings
,”
NAFEMS Int. J of CFD Case Studies
,
1
, Apr., pp.
7
18
.
5.
Drake, S. N., Pericleous, K. A., and Scheiwiller, T., 1991, “Computational fluid dynamics a mathematical tool to simulate dispersal of airborne pollution,” Proc. Int. Conf. Environmental Pollution, Lisbon, Portugal.
6.
Schuh
,
M. J.
,
Schuler
,
C. A.
, and
Humphrey
,
J. A. C.
,
1989
, “
Numerical calculation of particle laden gas flows past tubes
,”
AIChE J.
,
35
, No.
3
, pp.
466
480
.
7.
Chan
,
S. H.
, and
Moussa
,
B.
,
1996
, “
Trajectories and deposition of silica on cylinders in crossflow with and without a magnetic field
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
118
, Nov., pp.
903
910
.
8.
Kallio
,
G. A.
, and
Stock
,
D. E.
,
1992
, “
Interaction of electrostatic and fluid dynamic fields in wire-plate electrostatic precipitators
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
240
, pp.
133
166
.
9.
Choi
,
B. S.
, and
Fletcher
,
C. A. J.
,
1997
, “
Computation of particle transport in an electrostatic precipitator
,”
J. Electrost.
,
40 and 41
, pp.
413
418
.
10.
Young, M. E., and Kallio, G. A., 1991, “A numerical study of particle motion in an enclosed corotating disk flow,” ASME Fluids Engineering Division Publications, 121, Gas-Solid Flows, D. E. Stock et al., eds., pp. 57–64.
11.
Tucker, P. G., 1996, “Prediction and measurement of contamination transport in a mechatronic ATM system: a design study,” Presented at 11th AT&T Design for Excellence Conf., Florida.
12.
Hunt, J. C. R., 1995, “Practical and fundamental developments in the comptuational modelling of fluid flows,” Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs-81st Thomas Hawksley Memorial Lecture, Vol. 209, pp. 297–314.
13.
Tucker
,
P. G.
,
2000
, “
Prediction of turbulent oscillatory flows in complex systems
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
33
, pp.
869
895
.
14.
Zhou, Q., and Leschziner, M. A., 1997, “Modelling particle dispersion in turbulent recirculating flow with an anisotropy resolving scheme,” ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, FEDSM’97, June 22–26, pp. 1–8.
15.
Kraus, J. D., 1991, Electromagnetics, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
16.
Spalding, D. B., 1994, “Calculation of turbulent heat transfer in cluttered spaces,” Proc. 10th Int. Heat Transfer Conf., Brighton, UK.
17.
Bosch
,
G.
, and
Rodi
,
W.
,
1998
, “
Simulation of vortex shedding past a square cylinder with different turbulence models
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
28
, pp.
601
616
.
18.
Chen, C.-J., and Jaw, S.-Y., 1998, Fundamentals of turbulence modelling, Taylor&Francis.
19.
Wolfshtein
,
M.
,
1969
, “
The velocity and temperature distribution in one-dimensional flow with turbulence augmentation and pressure gradient
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
12
, pp.
301
318
.
20.
Launder
,
B. E.
, and
Spalding
,
D. B.
,
1974
, “
The numerical computation of turbulent flows
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
3
, pp.
269
289
.
21.
Speziale
,
C. G.
,
1987
, “
On non-linear k−l and k−ε models of turbulence
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
178
, pp.
459
475
.
22.
Iacovides
,
H.
, and
Chew
,
J. W.
,
1993
, “
The computation of convective heat transfer in rotating cavities
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
14
, No.
2
, pp.
146
154
.
23.
Patankar, S. V., 1980, Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow, Hemisphere, New York.
24.
Runchal
,
A. K.
,
1987
, “
CONDIF: A modified central-difference scheme for convective flows
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
24
, pp.
1593
1608
.
25.
Hinze, J. O., 1975, Turbulence, McGraw-Hill, New York.
26.
Milojevic
,
D.
,
1990
, “
Lagrangian stochastic-deterministic (LSD) predictions of particle dispersion in turbulence
,”
Part. Part. Syst. Charact.
,
7
, pp.
181
190
.
27.
Blythe, A. R., and Reddish, E., 1979, “Charge on powders and bulking effects,” Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser., No. 48, pp. 107–114.
28.
Sethian
,
J. A.
,
1999
, “
Fast Marching Methods
,”
SIAM Rev.
,
35
, No.
2
, pp.
199
235
.
29.
Tucker
,
P. G.
,
1998
, “
Assessment of geometric multilevel convergence and a wall distance method for flows with multiple internal boundaries
,”
Appl. Math. Model.
,
22
, pp.
293
311
.
30.
Lasance, C. M., 2000, Personal communication.
31.
Snyder
,
W. H.
, and
Lumley
,
J. L.
,
1971
, “
Some measurements of particle velocity autocorrelation function in turbulent flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
48
, pp.
41
71
.
You do not currently have access to this content.