A study has been carried out to determine the relative roles of the three diffusion sub-processes contained in the Lumley (1978) diffusion model. The three sub-processes are described as being the production of turbulent transport, the third-order pressure-velocity process, which regulates the relative magnitudes of the turbulent transport components, and the pressure-diffusion. The present work describes a unique method for calibrating the model based on an analysis of zero-mean-shear turbulence. On the basis of the analysis, and using recent direct numerical simulation and experimental data, the coefficients in the Lumley (1978) model are modified such that the model gives the correct behavior in the diffusive limit. The modified model was then validated by carrying out CFD predictions for three benchmark flows of engineering interest. The modified Lumley (1978) diffusion model has two clear advantages over the more commonly used Daly and Harlow (1970) model. First, unlike the Daly and Harlow (1970) model, the modified Lumley (1978) model is mathematically correct and second, it was shown in the present validation that the modified Lumley (1978) model gives the most consistently reasonable predictions.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 1999
Research Papers
A Modified Model for Diffusion in Second-Moment Turbulence Closures
Anthony G. Straatman
Anthony G. Straatman
Department of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 589
Search for other works by this author on:
Anthony G. Straatman
Department of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 589
J. Fluids Eng. Dec 1999, 121(4): 747-756 (10 pages)
Published Online: December 1, 1999
Article history
Received:
May 4, 1999
Revised:
September 6, 1999
Online:
December 4, 2007
Citation
Straatman, A. G. (December 1, 1999). "A Modified Model for Diffusion in Second-Moment Turbulence Closures." ASME. J. Fluids Eng. December 1999; 121(4): 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2823532
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Performance of Two-Equation Turbulence Models for Flat Plate Flows With Leading Edge Bubbles
J. Fluids Eng (February,2008)
Comparison of Film Effectiveness and Cooling Uniformity of Conical and Cylindrical-Shaped Film Hole With Coolant-Exit Temperature Correction
J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl (September,2011)
Effects of the Re-Entrant Bowl Geometry on a DI Turbocharged Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions—A CFD Approach
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (December,2010)
Numerical Techniques Applied to Hydraulic Turbines: A Perspective Review
Appl. Mech. Rev (January,2016)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Cavitating Structures at Inception in Turbulent Shear Flow
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Introduction
Mechanical Blood Trauma in Circulatory-Assist Devices
CFD Simulations of a Mixed-flow Pump Using Various Turbulence Models
Mixed-flow Pumps: Modeling, Simulation, and Measurements