Pump research and development efforts are primarily driven by the needs of the customer. Today, these needs are centered around cost and reliability issues with the understanding that certain threshold levels of performance are achieved. As centrifugal pumps have reached high levels of maturity in most industrial applications, we can anticipate, that in the future, customer expectations will change subtly but significantly. They will demand continuously reducing costs with the understanding that reliability and technology needs will be satisfied. This would lead to a strong emphasis on consistent predictability of performance in the field and to less of a focus on innovations in design. R&D efforts in the past were intended to stretch the envelope to produce better hydraulic performance, to improve mean-time-between-failures, and to operate at higher speeds. In contrast, R&D efforts in the future would be aimed towards cost reduction, accurate hydraulic, guarantees, and flawless performance in the field. In this paper, the R&D efforts of the past, present, and future are discussed in terms of three core competencies, which are essential for today’s pump manufacturer. These are hydraulics (with an emphasis on improving predictability of performance and improving impeller life), vibrations (with a view to providing cost effective problem solving/avoidance capability), and pump designs which capitalize on improved understanding of the underlying technologies.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Industrial research, Pumps, Reliability, Centrifugal pumps, Competencies, Design, Failure, Hydraulics, Impellers, Vibration
1.
Ashley, S., 1996, “Magnetic Bearing Retrofit for Pumps,” in Technology Focus Section, Mechanical Engineering, Dec.
2.
Childs, D. W., and Moyer, D. S., 1985, “Sample Rotor Dynamic Calculations Using Cal-Tech Rotor Dynamic Coefficients,” Addendum to paper by B. Jery et al., 2nd International Pump Symposium, Texas A&M University.
3.
Feng, T. et al, 1992, “Identification of Fluid Structure Interactions in Centrifugal Pumps,” 5th International Conference on Vibrations in Rotating Machinery, University of Bath.
4.
Ferman, R. et al, 1997, “Boiler Feed Pump Rerate for Increased Head and Reduced Cavitation,” 3rd ASME Pumping Machinery Symposium, Vancouver, Canada.
5.
Florjancic, S. and Frei, A., 1993, “Dynamic Loading on Pumps—Causes for Vibrations,” 10th International Pump Symposium, Texas A&M University.
6.
Gopalakrishnan, S., 1981, “Computer Based Hydraulic Design of Pumps,” 7th Technical Conference of the British Pump Manufacturer’s Association, York, England.
7.
Gopalakrishnan, S., Cugal, M., and Ferman, R., 1995, “Experimental and Theoretical Flow Field Analysis of Mixed Flow Pumps,” 2nd International Conference on Pumps and Fans, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
8.
Gopalakrishnan, S., 1993, “Impact of Hydraulic Design on Pump Reliability,” Rotating Machinery Conference and Exposition, Somerset, NJ.
9.
Gopalakrishnan, S., 1985, “Modern Cavitation Criteria for Centrifugal Pumps,” 2nd International Pump Symposium, Texas A&M University.
10.
Gopalakrishnan, S., 1996, “Diagnosis of Service Water Pump Problems,” EPRI SWSRI Seminar, Daytona Beach, FL.
11.
Gopalakrishnan, S., et al, 1982, “Critical Speed in Centrifugal Pumps,” ASME Paper No. 82-GT-277.
12.
Goto, A., 1997, “Prediction of Diffuser Pump Performance Using 3-D Viscous Stage Calculation,” 3rd ASME Pumping Machinery Symposium, Vancouver, Canada.
13.
Graf, E., 1993, “Analysis of Centrifugal Impeller BEP and Recirculating Flows,” ASME Pumping Machinery Symposium, Washington, DC.
14.
Guinzburg, A., 1992, “Rotor Dynamic Forces Generated by Discharge to Suction Leakage Flows in Centrifugal Pumps,” Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology.
15.
Gu¨lich, J. E., and Favre J. N., 1997, “An Assessment of Pumps Impeller Performance Predictions by 3-D Navier Stokes Calculations,” 3rd ASME Pumping Machinery Symposium, Vancouver, Canada.
16.
Gu¨lich, J., 1989, “Guidelines for Prevention of Cavitation in Centrifugal Feed Pumps,” EPRI GS 6398.
17.
Hanson, L., 1996, “A Commercial Threshold for Magnetic Bearings,” World Pumps, May.
18.
Hanson, L., and Imlach, J., 1992, “Development of a Magnetic Bearing API Process Pump with a Canned Motor,” 9th International Pump Symposium, Texas A&M University.
19.
Hirschi, R., et al, 1997, “Centrifugal Pump Performance Drop due to Leading Edge Cavitation,” 3rd ASME Pumping Machinery Symposium, Vancouver, Canada.
20.
Jery, B., et al, 1985, “Forces on Centrifugal Pump Impellers,” 2nd International Pump Symposium, Texas A&M University.
21.
Katsanis, T., 1964, “Use of Arbitrary Quasi Orthogonals for Calculating Flow Distribution in the Meridional Plane of a Turbomachine,” NASA TN D-2546
22.
Marscher, W. D., 1986, “Determination of Pump Critical Speeds during Operation through Use of Modal Analysis,” ASME Symposium on Fluid Machinery Trouble Shooting, Anaheim, CA.
23.
Olsen, D. B., et al, 1996, “Status Report on the Utah Continuous Flow Ventricular Assist Device,” 4th Cong. International Society Rotary Blood Pumps, Tokyo.
24.
Pace, S. E., et al, 1986, “Rotordynamic Developments for High Speed Multistage Pumps,” 3rd International Pump Symposium. Texas A&M University.
25.
Sloteman, D. P., Cooper, P., and Graf, E., 1991, “Design of High Energy Pump Impellers to Avoid Cavitation Instability and Damage,” EPRI Power Plant Pumps Symposium, Tampa, FL.
26.
Smith, J. and Oliver, J., 1991, “Techniques For Eddy Current Reduction in Magnetic Drives Using Metallic Containment Barriers,” 8th International Pump Symposium, Texas A&M University.
27.
Valenti, M., 1996, “CFD Software Improves Pump Design,” Mechanical Engineering, Nov.
28.
Verhoeven, J. J. 1988, “Unsteady Hydraulic Forces in Centrifugal Pumps,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers C348/88.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1999
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.