The flow in the cross-flow separation region of a 6:1 prolate spheroid at 10 deg angle of attack, ReL = 4.20 × 106, was investigated using a novel, miniature, 3-D, fiber-optic Laser Doppler Velocimeter (LDV). The probe was used to measure three simultaneous, orthogonal velocity components from within the model, from approximately y+ = 7 out to the boundary layer edge. Velocity, Reynolds stress, and velocity triple product measurements are presented. These measurements are used to calculate the skin friction and to examine the convection, production, and diffusion of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) about the three-dimensional separation. Comparisons of the measured production and diffusion of TKE in the cross-flow separation region—as well as in nonseparated regions of the flow—to the production and diffusion predicted by several models for these terms are shown.

1.
AGARD, 1990, “Calculation of 3D Separated Turbulent Flows in Boundary Layer Limit,” AGARD-AR-255, Neuilly sur Seine, France.
2.
Ahn, S., 1992, “An Experimental Study of Flow Over a 6 to 1 Prolate Spheroid at Incidence,” PhD Dissertation, Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
3.
Barber, K. M., and Simpson, R. L., 1991, “Mean Velocity and Turbulence Measurements of Flow Around a 6:1 Prolate Spheroid.” AIAA Paper 91–0255, 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, January 7–10, Reno, NV.
4.
Chesnakas
C. J.
, and
Simpson
R. L.
,
1994
, “
Full Three-Dimensional Measurements of the Cross-Flow Separation Region of a 6:1 Prolate Spheroid
,”
Experiments in Fluids
, Vol.
17
, No.
1/2
, pp.
68
74
.
5.
Chesnakas, C. J., Simpson, R. L., and Madden, M. M., 1994, “Three-Dimensional Velocity Measurements on a 6:1 Prolate Spheroid at 10° Angle of Attack,” Data Report VPI-AOE-202, Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
6.
Durst, F., Martinuzzi, R., Sender, J., and Thevenin, D., 1992, “LDA Measurements of Mean Velocity, RMS-Values and Higher Order Moments of Turbulence Intensity Fluctuations in Flow Fields with Strong Velocity Gradients,” Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, 5.1.1–5.1.6.
7.
East, L. F., and Sawyer, W. G., 1979, “An Investigation of the Structure of Equilibrium Turbulent Boundary Layers,” NATO-AGARD Fluid Dynamics Symposium Proceedings, No. 271, pp. 6.1–6.19.
8.
Gee
K.
,
Cummings
R. M.
, and
Schiff
L. B.
,
1992
, “
Turbulence Model Effects on Separated Flow About a Prolate Spheroid
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
30
, No.
3
, pp.
655
664
.
9.
Kreplin, H. P., Vollmers, H., and Meier, H. U., 1985, “Wall Shear Stress Measurements on an Inclined Prolate Spheroid in the DFVLR 3m × 3m Low Speed Wind Tunnel,” Data Report, DFVLR IB 222–84/A 33, Go¨ttingen, Germany.
10.
McLaughlin
D. K.
, and
Tiederman
W. G.
,
1973
, “
Biasing Correction for Individual Realization of Laser Anemometer Measurements in Turbulent Flows
,”
Physics of Fluids
, Vol.
16
, No.
12
, pp.
2082
2088
.
11.
Meier, H. U., Kreplin, H. P., Landhaußer, A., and Baumgarten, D., 1984, “Mean Velocity Distributions in Three-Dimensional Boundary Layers Developing on a 1:6 Prolate Spheroid with Natural Transition,” Data Report, DFVLR IB 222–4/A 10, Go¨ttingen, Germany.
12.
Meier, H. U., Kreplin, H. P., and Landhaußer, A., 1986, “Wall Pressure Measurements on a 1:6 Prolate Spheroid in the DFVLR 3m × 3m Low Speed Wind Tunnel (α = 10°, U = 55 m/s, Artificial Transition),” Data Report, DFVLR IB 222-86 A 04, Go¨ttingen, Germany.
13.
Moin
P.
,
Shih
T. H.
,
Driver
D. M.
, and
Mansour
N. M.
,
1990
, “
Direct Numerical Simulation of a Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layer
,”
Physics of Fluids A
, Vol.
2
, pp.
601
639
.
14.
O¨lc¸men
S. M.
, and
Simpson
R. L.
,
1992
, “
Perspective: On the Near Wall Similarity of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layers
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING
, Vol.
114
, pp.
487
495
.
15.
O¨lc¸men
S. M.
, and
Simpson
R. L.
,
1995
, “
An Experimental Study of a Three-Dimensional Pressure-Driven Turbulent Boundary Layer
,”
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
, Vol.
290
, pp.
225
262
.
16.
Rotta, J. C., 1962, “Turbulent Boundary Layers in Incompressible Flow,” Progress in Aeronautical Sciences, A. Ferri, D. Ku¨chemann, and L. H. G. Sterne, eds., The MacMillan Company, New York, Vol. 2, pp. 1–220.
17.
Rotta, J. C., 1979, “A Family of Turbulence Models for Three-Dimensional Boundary Layers,” Turbulent Shear Flows 1, F. Durst, B. E. Launder, F. W. Schmidt and J. H. Whitelaw, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 267–278.
18.
Schetz, J. A., 1993, Boundary Layer Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood, NJ.
19.
Sendstad, O., and Moin, P., 1992, “The Near Wall Mechanics of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layers,” TF-57, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
20.
Spalart
P. R.
,
1988
, “
Direct Simulation of a Turbulent Boundary Layer up to Rθ = 1410
,”
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
, Vol.
187
, pp.
61
98
.
21.
Vollmers, H., Kreplin, H. P., Meier, H. U., and Ku¨hn, A., 1985, “Measured Mean Velocity Field Around a 1:6 Prolate Spheroid at Various Cross Sections,” Data Report, DFVLR IB 221–85 A 08, Go¨ttingen, Germany.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.