The formation of gas bubbles is one of the most characteristic phenomena of fluidized beds. Many unique properties of fluidized beds can be related directly to the presence of bubbles and are dominated by their behavior. Therefore, accurate prediction of parameters such as bubble shape and size, voidage variation and throughflow are practically important. In the present analysis, an approximate model, based on a strongly idealized picture of the bubble formation has been presented. The bubbling gas fluidized bed has regions of low solids density comprised of gas pockets or voids. The observed voids exhibited a variety of shapes (Halow and Nicoletti, 1992), depending upon the material and fluidization velocity. In the low-velocity experiments with the finer materials, rounded voids are observed. However, with coarser materials, voids were typically large and bluntnosed. In the image analyses work, reported by Gautam (1989), in a bed operating slightly above the incipient fluidization, elongated bubbles (a > b, as shown in Figure 1) were observed for glass beads (sp. gravity = 2.5) of mean diameter 500 μm and flattened bubbles (a < b) were seen for mean particle diameter of 350 μm. Also, he noticed the dependence of throughflow velocity on the elongation of the bubble as it traverses up the bed. Additionally, throughflow velocity was found to be independent of the excess gas flow rate through the bed. The digitized image of a typical bubble (refer Gautam et al., 1994) which shows that the bubble were elongated in the vertical direction and were more elliptical than circular. Therefore, description of a bubble on the basis of just one diameter, either the horizontal or the vertical or an equivalent diameter, as has been done by many researchers in the past, is rather incomplete. It is inferred from the present work that the bubble aspect ratio plays an important role in predicting an accurate gas flow through the bubble.

1.
Carnahan, B., Luther, H. A., and Wilkes, J. O., 1972, Applied Numerical Methods, Wiley, New York.
2.
Collins
 
R.
,
1965
, “
An Extension of Davidson’s Theory of Bubbles in Fluidized Beds
,”
Chemical Engineering Science
, Vol.
20
, pp.
747
754
.
3.
Davidson
 
J. F.
,
1961
, “
Symposium On Fluidization-Discussion
,”
Transactions, Institution of Chemical Engineers
, Vol.
39
, pp.
230
232
.
4.
Gautam
 
M.
,
Jurewicz
 
J. T.
, and
Kale
 
S. R.
,
1994
, “
An Experimental Investigation of Throughflow Velocities in Two-Dimensional Fluidized Bed Bubbles: Laser Doppler Anemometers Measurements
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING
, Vol.
116
(
3
), pp.
605
612
.
5.
Gera, D., 1994, “Analysis and Prediction of Throughflow Velocity in Two-Dimensional Fluidized Beds,” Ph.D. dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
6.
Gera
 
D.
, and
Gautam
 
M.
,
1994
, “
Effect Of Voidage Variation and Bubble Aspect Ratio on Throughflow in 2-D Elliptical Bubbles
,”
Powder Technology
, Vol.
79
(
2
), pp.
159
65
.
7.
Grace
 
J. R.
, and
Harrison
 
D.
,
1969
, “
The Behavior Of Freely Bubbling Fluidized Beds
,”
Chemical Engineering Science
, Vol.
24
, pp.
497
508
.
8.
Hailu
 
L.
,
Plaka
 
F.
,
Clift
 
R.
, and
Davidson
 
J. F.
,
1993
, “
Measurement of Gas Flow Through a Two-Dimensional Bubble in a Fluidized Bed
,”
Institution of Chemical Engineers, Transactions
, Vol.
71
, Part-A, pp.
382
89
.
9.
Halow
 
J. S.
, and
Nicoletti
 
P.
,
1992
, “
Observations Of Fluidized Bed Coalescence Using Capacitance Imaging
,”
Powder Technology
, Vol.
69
, pp.
255
277
.
10.
Jackson
 
R.
,
1963
, “
The Mechanics Of Fluidized Beds: Part-I and Part-II
,”
Transactions, Institution of Chemical Engineers
, Vol.
41
, pp.
13
28
.
11.
Leung
 
L. S.
,
Sandford
 
I. C.
, and
Mak
 
F. K.
,
1970
, “
Effects Of Voidage on Throughflow in Bubbles In A Fluidized Beds
,”
Chemical Engineering Sci.
, Vol.
25
, pp.
220
221
.
12.
Lockett
 
M. J.
,
Davidson
 
J. F.
, and
Harrison
 
D.
,
1967
, “
On The Two Phase Theory Of Fluidization
,”
Chemical Engineering Science
, Vol.
22
, pp.
1059
66
.
13.
Martin-Gautier, A. L. F., and Pyle, D. L., 1975, “The Fluid Mechanics of Single Bubbles,” Fluidization Technology, D. Kearns, ed., Hemisphere Publishing Corp., Washington, pp. 21–41.
14.
Milne-Thomson, L. M., 1962, Theoretical Hydrodynamics, 4th edition, Macmillan.
15.
Murray
 
J. D.
,
1965
, “
On The Mathematics Of Fluidization Part 2
,”
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
, Vol.
22
, pp.
57
80
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.