The steady two-dimensional marginal separation of an incompressible boundary layer flow within a channel was solved independently by three different methods: the triple-deck method of marginal separation, the interactive boundary layer method, and the full Navier-Stokes computation. From comparison of the results between these three methods, the accuracy and appropriateness of each method was determined. The critical condition beyond which the steady marginal separation solution of triple-deck method does not exist was related to a physical phenomenon in which the separation bubble becomes unsteady. Factors such as Reynolds number and pressure gradient distribution which might influence the accuracy of the marginal separation solution were also investigated.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1994
Research Papers
Comparison of the Triple-Deck Theory, Interactive Boundary Layer Method, and Navier-Stokes Computation for Marginal Separation
Chao-Tsung Hsiao,
Chao-Tsung Hsiao
Mechanical Engineering Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Laura L. Pauley
Laura L. Pauley
Mechanical Engineering Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Chao-Tsung Hsiao
Mechanical Engineering Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Laura L. Pauley
Mechanical Engineering Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
J. Fluids Eng. Mar 1994, 116(1): 22-28 (7 pages)
Published Online: March 1, 1994
Article history
Received:
October 7, 1992
Revised:
October 7, 1993
Online:
May 23, 2008
Citation
Hsiao, C., and Pauley, L. L. (March 1, 1994). "Comparison of the Triple-Deck Theory, Interactive Boundary Layer Method, and Navier-Stokes Computation for Marginal Separation." ASME. J. Fluids Eng. March 1994; 116(1): 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2910235
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Modeling and Analysis of the Leading-Edge Vortex on Flapping Foil Turbines in Swing-Arm Mode
J. Fluids Eng (June 2023)
Special Issue on the 2022 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting
J. Fluids Eng (June 2023)
Related Articles
Forcing Boundary-Layer Transition on a Single-Element Wing in Ground Effect
J. Fluids Eng (October,2017)
Calculation of High-Lift Cascades in Low Pressure Turbine Conditions Using a Three-Equation Model
J. Turbomach (July,2011)
Measurements in Separated and Transitional Boundary Layers Under Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions
J. Turbomach (April,2001)
Passive Manipulation of Separation-Bubble Transition Using Surface Modifications
J. Fluids Eng (February,2009)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Introduction
Design and Analysis of Centrifugal Compressors
Boundary Layer Analysis
Centrifugal Compressors: A Strategy for Aerodynamic Design and Analysis
Aerodynamic Performance Analysis
Axial-Flow Compressors