Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing is an indispensable procedure to the economic development of shale gas. The flowback of the hydraulic fracturing fluid is one of the most important parameters recorded after shale gas wells are put into production. Generally, the flowback ratio is used as the flowback indicator during hydraulic fracturing. The flowback ratio has a great influence on shale gas production. However, the flowback ratio is subjected to various affecting factors with their correlativity unclear. Based on a large amount of original geological, engineering, and dynamic data acquired from 373 hydraulically fractured horizontal wells, the flowback characteristics were systematically studied based on machine learning. Based on the data analysis and random forest forecasting, a new indicator, single-cluster flowback ratio, was proposed, which can more effectively reflect the inherent relationship between flowback fluid volume and influencing factors. The results of training random forests for big data show that this indicator has better learnability and predictability. A good linear relationship exists between single-cluster flowback ratios in different production stages. Accordingly, the 30-day single-cluster flowback ratio can be used to predict the 90-day and 180-day single-cluster flowback ratios. The main controlling factors of production and flowback ratio were also systematically analyzed. It is found that the main controlling factors of the flowback ratio include the number of fracturing clusters, the total amount of sand, number of fracturing stages, and fluid injection intensity per cluster. This study can provide a fundamental reference for analyzing the hydraulically fracturing fluid flowback for shale gas reservoirs.

References

1.
Hernández-Pérez
,
L. G.
,
Lira-Barragán
,
L. F.
,
El-Halwagi
,
M. M.
, and
Ponce-Ortega
,
J. M.
,
2022
, “
Optimization of Water Management Strategies for Shale Gas Extraction Considering Uncertainty in Water Availability and Flowback Water
,”
Chem. Eng. Res. Des.
,
186
(
9
), pp.
300
313
.
2.
Seales
,
M. B.
,
2020
, “
Multiphase Flow in Highly Fractured Shale Gas Reservoirs: Review of Fundamental Concepts for Numerical Simulation
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
142
(
10
), p.
100801
.
3.
Seales
,
M. B.
,
Ertekin
,
T.
, and
Yilin Wang
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Recovery Efficiency in Hydraulically Fractured Shale Gas Reservoirs
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
139
(
4
), p.
042901
.
4.
Williams-Kovacs
,
J. D.
, and
Clarkson
,
C. R.
,
2016
, “
A Modified Approach for Modeling Two-Phase Flowback From Multi-fractured Horizontal Shale Gas Wells
,”
J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.
,
30
, pp.
127
147
.
5.
Mehana
,
M.
,
Callard
,
J.
,
Kang
,
Q.
, and
Viswanathan
,
H.
,
2021
, “
Complex Fracture Depletion Model for Reserves Estimations in Shale
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
143
(
5
), p. 053006.
6.
Benson
,
A. L.
, and
Clarkson
,
C. R.
,
2022
, “
Flowback Rate-Transient Analysis With Spontaneous Imbibition Effects
,”
J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.
,
108
, p.
104830
.
7.
Cao
,
K.
,
Siddhamshetty
,
P.
,
Ahn
,
Y.
,
El-Halwagi
,
M. M.
, and
Kwon
,
J. S. I.
,
2020
, “
Evaluating the Spatiotemporal Variability of Water Recovery Ratios of Shale Gas Wells and Their Effects on Shale Gas Development
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
276
, p.
123171
.
8.
Fu
,
Y.
, and
Dehghanpour
,
H.
,
2020
, “Advances in Flowback Analysis: Fracturing Water Production Obeys a Simple Decline Model,”
Unconventional Shale Gas Development
,
R. G.
Moghanloo
, ed.,
GPP Press
,
Houston, FL
, pp.
299
321
.
9.
Hun
,
L.
,
Xiang
,
Z.
,
Yulong
,
C.
,
Bing
,
Y.
,
Xixiang
,
S.
,
Xinyi
,
S.
, and
Lifei
,
D.
,
2021
, “Investigation of the Factors Influencing the Flowback Ratio in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Study Based on Experimental Observations and Numerical Simulations,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
143
(
11
), p.
113201
.
10.
Zhou
,
Q.
,
Kleit
,
A.
,
Wang
,
J.
, and
Dilmore
,
R.
,
2014
, “
Evaluating Gas Production Performances in Marcellus Using Data Mining Technologies
,”
Unconventional Resources Technology Conference
,
Denver, CO, Aug. 25–27, SEG
,
Tulsa, OK,
pp.
20
36
.
11.
Zhou
,
Q.
,
Dilmore
,
R.
,
Kleit
,
A.
, and
Wang
,
J. Y.
,
2016
, “
Evaluating Fracture-Fluid Flowback in Marcellus Using Data-Mining Technologies
,”
SPE Prod. Oper.
,
31
(
02
), pp.
133
146
.
12.
Ilk
,
D.
,
Currie
,
S. M.
,
Symmons
,
D.
,
Rushing
,
J. A.
,
Broussard
,
N. J.
, and
Blasingame
,
T. A.
,
2010
, “
A Comprehensive Workflow for Early Analysis and Interpretation of Flowback Data From Wells in Tight Gas/Shale Reservoir Systems
,”
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
,
Florence, Italy
, September, OnePetro, Paper No. SPE-135607-MS.
13.
Yang
,
B.
,
Hao
,
Z.
,
You
,
L.
,
Kang
,
Y.
, and
Chen
,
Z.
,
2020
, “
Estimating the Fracturing Fluid Recovery in Shale Gas Reservoirs: Experiments and Field Data Analysis
,”
Arab. J. Sci. Eng.
,
45
(
9
), pp.
7851
7861
.
14.
Lin
,
B.
,
Guo
,
J.
,
Liu
,
X.
,
Xiang
,
J.
, and
Zhong
,
H.
,
2020
, “
Prediction of Flowback Ratio and Production in Sichuan Shale Gas Reservoirs and Their Relationships With Stimulated Reservoir Volume
,”
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
,
184
, p.
106529
.
15.
Yuyang
,
L.
,
Xinhua
,
M.
,
Xiaowei
,
Z.
,
Wei
,
G.
,
Lixia
,
K.
,
Rongze
,
Y.
, and
Yuping
,
S.
,
2021
, “
Shale Gas Well Flowback Rate Prediction for Weiyuan Field Based on a Deep Learning Algorithm
,”
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
,
203
, p.
108637
.
16.
Mahmoud
,
A. A.
,
Gamal
,
H.
,
Elkatatny
,
S.
, and
Alsaihati
,
A.
,
2022
, “
Estimating the Total Organic Carbon for Unconventional Shale Resources During the Drilling Process: A Machine Learning Approach
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
144
(
4
), p.
043004
.
17.
Mahmoud
,
A. A.
, and
Elkatatny
,
S.
,
2021
, “
Novel Empirical Correlation for Estimation of the Total Organic Carbon in Devonian Shale From the Spectral Gamma-Ray and Based on the Artificial Neural Networks
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
143
(
9
), p.
093002
.
18.
Ibrahim
,
A. F.
,
Elkatatny
,
S.
,
Abdelraouf
,
Y.
, and
Al Ramadan
,
M.
,
2022
, “
Application of Various Machine Learning Techniques in Predicting Water Saturation in Tight Gas Sandstone Formation
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
144
(
8
), p.
083009
.
19.
Lake
,
L.
,
Johns
,
R. T.
,
Rossen
,
W. R.
, and
Pope
,
G. A.
,
2014
,
Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil Recovery
,
SPE
.
20.
Liang
,
B.
,
Liu
,
J.
,
You
,
J.
,
Jia
,
J.
,
Pan
,
Y.
, and
Jeong
,
H.
,
2023
, “Hydrocarbon Production Dynamics Forecasting Using Machine Learning: A State-of-the-Art Review,”
Fuel
,
337
, p.
127067
.
21.
Lu
,
C.
,
Jiang
,
H.
,
Yang
,
J.
,
Wang
,
Z.
,
Zhang
,
M.
, and
Li
,
J.
,
2022
, “
Shale Oil Production Prediction and Fracturing Optimization Based on Machine Learning
,”
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
,
217
, p.
110900
.
You do not currently have access to this content.