Abstract

Proppant flowback is a significant issue in the field of fractured well production. In order to investigate the influencing relationships among the parameters affecting proppant flowback, the weight of proppant flowback within different conditions was tested by applying a fracture simulation experiment device. During the experiments, the flowback velocity of the fracturing fluid, the viscosity of the fracturing fluid, the proppant particle size, and the effective closure pressure were studied. The experimental results indicated that the flowback velocity of the fracturing fluid is critical for proppant flowback. The weight of the flowback proppant increases as the fracturing fluid flowback velocity increases. Proppant flowback mainly occurs in the early stage of fracturing fluid flowback; more than 75% of the flowback volume of the proppant was carried by 33.33% of the fracturing fluid flowback volume. The weight of the flowback proppant decreases as the flowback fracturing fluid viscosity decreases. Using a larger particle size proppant or upon increasing effective closure pressure also can decrease the weight of the flowback proppant.

References

1.
Osholake
,
T.
,
Wang
,
J. Y.
, and
Ertekin
,
T.
,
2013
, “
Factors Affecting Hydraulically Fractured Well Performance in the Marcellus Shale Gas Reservoirs
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
135
(
1
), p.
031402
. 10.1115/1.4007766
2.
He
,
S.
, and
Chen
,
C.
,
2002
, “
Sand Control Technology of Discharge Fluids After Sand Fracturing
,”
Nat. Gas Ind.
,
22
(
3
), pp.
45
46
(in Chinese)
.
3.
Hu
,
A.
, and
Chen
,
J.
,
1999
, “
Recent Advances in Coated Proppants and its Flowback Control Technologies
,”
Drilling Prod. Technol.
,
22
(
3
), pp.
44
46
(in Chinese)
.
4.
Guo
,
T.
,
Gong
,
F.
,
Lin
,
X.
,
Lin
,
Q.
, and
Wang
,
X.
,
2018
, “
Experimental Investigation on Damage Mechanism of Guar Gum Fracturing Fluid to Low-Permeability Reservoir Based on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
140
(
7
), p.
072906
. 10.1115/1.4039324
5.
Mark
,
P.
, and
Diederik
,
V. B.
,
1999
, “
Understanding Proppant Flowback
,”
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
,
Houston, TX
,
Oct. 3–6
,
SPE 56726
.
6.
Barree
,
R. D.
, and
Mukherjee
,
H.
,
1995
, “
Engineering Criteria for Fracture Flowback Procedures
,”
SPE Rocky Mountain Ragiona/Low-Permeability Reservoirs Symposium
,
Denver, CO
,
Mar. 20–22
,
SPE 29600
.
7.
McLennan
,
J.
,
Walton
,
I.
,
Moore
,
J.
,
Brinton
,
D.
, and
Lund
,
J.
,
2015
, “
Proppant Backflow: Mechanical and Flow Considerations
,”
Geothermics
,
57
, pp.
224
237
. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.06.006
8.
Pratanu
,
R.
,
Wyatt
,
L.
,
Du
,
F.
, and
Stuart
,
D. C. W.
,
2015
, “
Proppant Transport at the Fracture Scale: Simulation and Experiment
,”
The 49th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium
,
San Francisco
,
CA
,
June 28–July 1
,
ARMA 15-0662
.
9.
Rakshit
,
S.
,
Jennifer
,
L. M.
, and
Karen
,
E. O.
,
2014
, “
Laboratory Results of Proppant Transport in Complex Fracture Systems
,”
SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference
,
The Woodlands, TX
,
Feb. 4–6
,
SPE 168579
.
10.
Fjaestad
,
D.
, and
Tomac
,
I.
,
2018
, “
Experimental Investigation of Proppant Flow and Transport in Narrow Fractures
,”
The 52nd US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium
,
Seattle, WA
,
June 17–20
,
ARMA 18–1189
.
11.
Mack
,
M.
,
Sun
,
J.
,
Khadilkar
,
C.
, and
Materials
,
O.
,
2014
, “
Quantifying Proppant Transport in Thin Fluids—Theory and Experiments
,”
SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference
,
The Woodlands, TX
,
Feb. 4–6
,
SPE 168637
.
12.
Wang
,
L.
, and
Zhang
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Research on the Influence of Proppant Combination Ratio on Proppant Backflow Volume and Distribution in Fracture
,”
Xinjiang Oil Gas
,
10
(
4
), pp.
50
52
(in Chinese)
.
13.
Hu
,
J.
,
He
,
S.
,
Li
,
Y.
,
Deng
,
Y.
, and
Zhao
,
J.
,
2008
, “
Study on the Models for the Forced Flow-Back of Fracturing Fluid and the Backflow of Proppant
,”
J. Xi’an Shiyou Univ.
,
23
(
5
), pp.
57
61
(in Chinese)
.
14.
Rahman
,
M. K.
,
Salim
,
M. M.
, and
Rahman
,
M. M.
,
2012
, “
Analytical Modeling of Non-Darcy Flow-Induced Conductivity Damage in Propped Hydraulic Fractures
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
134
(
4
), p.
043101
. 10.1115/1.4007658
15.
Roman
,
J. S.
, and
Mukul
,
M. S.
,
2014
, “
Reducing Proppant Flowback From Fractures: Factors Affecting the Maximum Flowback Rate
,”
SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference
,
The Woodlands, TX
,
Feb. 4–6
,
SPE 168649
.
16.
Tiab
,
D.
,
Lu
,
J.
,
Nguyen
,
H.
, and
Owayed
,
J.
,
2010
, “
Evaluation of Fracture Asymmetry of Finite-Conductivity Fractured Wells
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
132
(
1
), p.
012901
. 10.1115/1.4000700
17.
Kaustubh
,
S.
, and
Mukul
,
M. S.
,
2018
, “
Proppant Transport in Complex Fracture Networks
,”
SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference & Exhibition
,
The Woodlands, TX
,
Jan. 23–25
,
SPE 189895-MS
.
18.
Putri
,
K.
,
Lu
,
H.
,
Kwok
,
C. K.
, and
Katharine
,
M.
,
2018
, “
Flowback in Shale Wells: Proppant Transport and Distribution in the Wellbore
,”
Unconventional Resources Technology Conference
,
Houston, TX
,
July 23–25
,
URTeC: 2887450
.
19.
Chang
,
O.
,
Kinzel
,
M.
,
Dilmore
,
R.
, and
Wang
,
J. Y.
,
2018
, “
Physics of Proppant Transport Through Hydraulic Fracture Network
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
140
(
3
), p.
032912
. 10.1115/1.4038850
You do not currently have access to this content.