Underground injection of slurry in cycles with shut-in periods allows fracture closure and pressure dissipation which in turn prevents pressure accumulation and injection pressure increase from batch to batch. However, in many cases, the accumulation of solids on the fracture faces slows down the leak off which can delay the fracture closure up to several days. The objective in this study is to develop a new predictive method to monitor the stress increment evolution when well shut-in time between injection batches is not sufficient to allow fracture closure. The new technique predicts the fracture closure pressure from the instantaneous shut-in pressure (ISIP) and the injection formation petrophysical/mechanical properties including porosity, permeability, overburden stress, formation pore pressure, Young's modulus, and Poisson's ratio. Actual injection pressure data from a biosolids injector have been used to validate the new predictive technique. During the early well life, the match between the predicted fracture closure pressure values and those obtained from the G-function analysis was excellent, with an absolute error of less than 1%. In later injection batches, the predicted stress increment profile shows a clear trend consistent with the mechanisms of slurry injection and stress shadow analysis. Furthermore, the work shows that the injection operational parameters such as injection flow rate, injected volume per batch, and the volumetric solids concentration have strong impact on the predicted maximum disposal capacity which is reached when the injection zone in situ stress equalizes the upper barrier stress.

References

1.
Hanson
,
M. E.
,
Anderson
,
G. D.
, and
Shaffer
,
R. J.
,
1980
, “
Theoretical and Experimental Research on Hydraulic Fracturing
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
102
(
2
), pp.
92
98
.
2.
Mendelsohn
,
D. A.
,
1984
, “
A Review of Hydraulic Fracture Modeling—Part I: General Concepts, 2D Models, Motivation for 3D Modeling
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
106
(
3
), pp.
369
376
.
3.
Bautista
,
J. F.
, and
Taleghani
,
A. D.
,
2016
, “
The State of the Art and Challenges in Geomechanical Modeling of Injector Wells: A Review Paper
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
139
(
1
), p.
012910
.
4.
Kordzi
,
J.
,
1998
, “
Class 1 Fracture Slurry Injection: A Summary of the Technology and Recommendation for Implementation
,” USEPA, Region 6, Report No. 1.
5.
Vatsa
,
J.
, and
Wang
,
J. Y.
,
2013
, “
Fracture Height Containment in the Stimulation of Oriskany Formation
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
135
(2), p.
022902
.
6.
Wang
,
W.
, and
Taleghani
,
A. D.
,
2014
, “
Simulating Multizone Fracturing in Vertical Wells
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
136
(
4
), p.
042902
.
7.
Abou-Sayed
,
A. S.
,
Andrews
,
D. E.
, and
Buhidma
,
I. M.
,
1989
, “
Evaluation of Oily Waste Injection Below the Permafrost in Prudhoe Bay Field
,”
SPE California Regional Meeting
, Bakersfield, CA, Apr. 5–7, SPE Paper No.
SPE-18757-PA
.
8.
Willson
,
S. M.
,
Rylance
,
M.
, and
Last
,
N. C.
,
1993
, “
Fracture Mechanics Issues Relating to Cuttings Re-Injection at Shallow Depth
,”
SPE/IADC Drilling Conference
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Feb. 22–25, pp.
23
25
, SPE Paper No.
SPE/IADC 25756
.
9.
Guo
,
Q.
,
Abou-Sayed
,
A. S.
, and
Engel
,
H.
,
2003
, “
Feeling the Pulse of Drill Cuttings Injection Wells-A Case Study of Simulation, Monitoring and Verification in Alaska
,”
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Denver, CO, Oct. 5–8, SPE Paper No.
SPE-84156-PA
.
10.
Schmidt
,
J. H.
,
Friar
,
W. L.
,
Bill
,
M. L.
, and
Cooper
,
G. D.
,
1999
, “
Large-Scale Injection of North Slope Drilling Cuttings
,”
SPE/EPA Exploration and Production Environmental Conference
, Austin, TX, Mar. 1–3, SPE Paper No.
SPE-52738-MS
.
11.
Abou-Sayed
,
A. S.
,
Zaki
,
K.
, and
Summers
,
C.
,
2004
, “
Management of Sour Gas by Underground Injection-Assessment, Challenges, and Recommendations
,”
SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production
, Calgary, AB, Canada, Mar. 29–31, SPE Paper No.
SPE-86605-MS
.
12.
Baker
,
B. D.
,
Englehardt
,
J. M.
, and
Reid
,
J. D.
,
1999
, “
Large Scale NORM/NOW Disposal Through Slurry Waste Injection: Data Analysis and Modeling
,”
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Houston, TX, Oct. 5–8, SPE Paper No.
SPE-56491-MS
.
13.
Veil
,
J. A.
,
2003
, “
Innovative Technologies for Managing Oil Field Waste
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
125
(
3
), pp.
238
248
.
14.
EPA,
1999
, “
Biosolids Generation, Use, and Disposal in the United States
,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/Municipal and Industrial Solid Waste Division, Washington, DC, Report No. EPA 530-R-99-009.
15.
Diaz
,
L. F.
,
Savage
,
G. M.
,
Trezek
,
G. J.
, and
Golueke
,
C. G.
,
1981
, “
Biogasification of Municipal Solid Wastes
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
103
(
2
), pp.
180
185
.
16.
Gulyurtlu
,
I.
,
Helena Lopes
,
M.
,
Abelha
,
P.
,
Cabrita
,
I.
, and
Oliveira
,
J. F.
,
2005
, “
The Study of Partitioning of Heavy Metals During Fluidized Bed Combustion of Sewage Sludge and Coal
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
128
(
2
), pp.
104
110
.
17.
Güell
,
B. M.
,
Sandquist
,
J.
, and
Sørum
,
L.
,
2012
, “
Gasification of Biomass to Second Generation Biofuels: A Review
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
135
(
1
), p.
014001
.
18.
Bruno
,
M. S.
,
2008
, “
Keynote Lecture - Slurry Fracture Injection Of Petroleum and Municipal Sanitation Wastes
,”
Fifth Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium
, Tehran, Iran, Nov. 24–26, SPE Paper No. ISRM-ARMS5-2008-004.
19.
Abou-Sayed
,
A. S.
,
Guo
,
Q.
,
Wang
,
G.
,
McLennan
,
J. D.
, and
Zaki
,
K.
,
2002
, “
Challenges for Monitoring and Verification of Drill Cuttings Reinjection Performance
,”
SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference
, Irving, TX, Oct. 20–23, SPE Paper No.
SPE-78186-MS
.
20.
Barree
,
R. D.
,
Barree
,
V. L.
, and
Craig
,
D. P.
,
2009
, “
Holistic Fracture Diagnostics: Consistent Interpretation of Prefrac Injection Tests Using Multiple Analysis Methods
,”
SPE Prod. Oper.
,
24
(
3
), pp.
396
406
.
21.
Nolte
,
K. G.
,
1979
, “
Determination of Fracture Parameters From Fracturing Pressure Decline
,”
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Las Vegas, NV, Sept. 23–26, SPE Paper No.
SPE-8341-MS
.
22.
Mohamed
,
I. M.
,
Nasralla
,
R. A.
,
Sayed
,
M. A.
,
Marongiu-Porcu
,
M.
, and
Ehling-Economides
,
C. A.
,
2011
, “
Evaluation of After Closure Analysis Techniques for Tight and Shale Gas Formations
,”
SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference
, The Woodlands, TX, Jan. 24–25, SPE Paper No.
SPE-140136-MS
.
23.
Kholy
,
S. M.
,
Mohamed
,
I. M.
,
Loloi
,
M.
,
Abou-Sayed
,
O.
, and
Abou-Sayed
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Development of an Empirical Equation to Predict Hydraulic Fracture Closure Pressure From the Initial Shut-in Pressure After Treatment
,”
SPE Liquids-Rich Basins Conference—North America Held in Midland
, TX, Sept. 13–14, SPE Paper No.
SPE-187495-MS
.
24.
Horner
,
D. R.
,
1951
, “
Pressure Build-Up in Wells
,”
Third World Petroleum Congress
, The Hague, The Netherlands, May 28–June 6, SPE Paper No. WPC-4135.
25.
Elkatatny
,
S.
,
2018
, “
Application of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Estimate the Static Poisson's Ratio Based on Wireline Log Data
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
140
(
7
), p.
072905
.
26.
Canady
,
W.
,
2011
, “
A Method for Full-Range Young's Modulus Correction
,”
SPE North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition
, The Woodlands, TX, June 14–16, SPE Paper No.
SPE-143604-MS
.
27.
Eaton
,
B. A.
,
1969
, “
Fracture Gradient Prediction and Its Application in Oilfield Operations
,”
SPE J. Pet. Technol.
,
21
(
10
), pp.
1353
1360
.
28.
Chang
,
O.
,
Kinzel
,
M.
,
Dilmore
,
R.
, and
Wang
,
J.
,
2018
, “
Physics of Proppant Transport Through Hydraulic Fracture Network
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
140
(
3
), p.
032912
.
29.
Mohamed
,
I. M.
,
Block
,
G.
,
Kholy
,
S. M.
,
Abou-Sayed
,
O.
, and
Abou-Sayed
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Accurate Forecasts of Stress Accumulation During Slurry Injection Operations
,”
50th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium
, June 26–29, SPE Paper No. ARMA-2016-365.
30.
Warpinski
,
N. R.
,
2000
, “
Analytic Crack Solutions for Tilt Fields Around Hydraulic Fractures
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. SAND2000-0045J.
You do not currently have access to this content.