Production forecast of steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) in heterogeneous reservoir is important for reservoir management and optimization of development strategies for oil sand operations. In this work, artificial intelligence (AI) approaches are employed as a complementary tool for production forecast and pattern recognition of highly nonlinear relationships between system variables. Field data from more than 2000 wells are extracted from various publicly available sources. It consists of petrophysical log measurements, production and injection profiles. Analysis of a raw dataset of this magnitude for SAGD reservoirs has not been published in the literature, although a previous study presented a much smaller dataset. This paper attempts to discuss and address a number of the challenges encountered. After a detailed exploratory data analysis, a refined dataset encompassing ten different SAGD operating fields with 153 complete well pairs is assembled for prediction model construction. Artificial neural network (ANN) is employed to facilitate the production performance analysis by calibrating the reservoir heterogeneities and operating constraints with production performance. The impact of extrapolation of the petrophysical parameters from the nearby vertical well is assessed. As a result, an additional input attribute is introduced to capture the uncertainty in extrapolation, while a new output attribute is incorporated as a quantitative measure of the process efficiency. Data-mining algorithms including principal components analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis are applied to improve prediction quality and model robustness by removing data correlation and by identifying internal structures among the dataset, which are novel extensions to the previous SAGD analysis study. Finally, statistical analysis is conducted to study the uncertainties in the final ANN predictions. The modeling results are demonstrated to be both reliable and acceptable. This paper demonstrates the combination of AI-based approaches and data-mining analysis can facilitate practical field data analysis, which is often prone to uncertainties, errors, biases, and noises, with high reliability and feasibility. Considering that many important system variables are typically unavailable in the public domain and, hence, are missing in the dataset, this work illustrates how practical AI approaches can be tailored to construct models capable of predicting SAGD recovery performance from only log-derived and operational variables. It also demonstrates the potential of AI models in assisting conventional SAGD analysis.

References

References
1.
Butler
,
R.
,
McNab
,
G.
, and
Lo
,
H.
,
1981
, “
Theoretical Studies on the Gravity Drainage of Heavy Oil During In-Situ Steam Heating
,”
Can. J. Chem. Eng.
,
59
(
4
), pp.
455
460
.
2.
Bagci
,
A. S.
,
2006
, “
Experimental and Simulation Studies of SAGD Process in Fractured Reservoirs
,”
SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery
, Tulsa, OK, Apr. 22–26,
SPE
Paper No. 99920.
3.
Sasaki
,
K.
,
Akibayashi
,
S.
, and
Kosukegawa
,
H.
,
1996
, “
Experimental Study on Initial Stage of SAGD Process Using 2-Dimensional Scaled Model for Heavy Oil Recovery
,”
International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology
, Calgary, AB, Canada, Nov. 18–20,
SPE
Paper No. 37089.
4.
Fatemi
,
S. M.
,
2009
, “
Simulation Study of Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) in Fractured Systems
,”
Oil Gas Sci. Technol.: Rev. IFP
,
64
(
4
), pp.
477
487
.
5.
Shin
,
H.
,
Hwang
,
T.
, and
Chon
,
B.
,
2012
, “
Optimal Grid System Design for SAGD Simulation
,”
SPE Heavy Oil Conference Canada
, Calgary, AB, Canada, June 12–14,
SPE
Paper No. 157900.
6.
Panwar
,
A.
,
Trivedi
,
J. J.
, and
Nejadi
,
S.
,
2015
, “
Importance of Distributed Temperature Sensor Data for Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage Reservoir Characterization and History Matching Within Ensemble Kalman Filter Framework
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
137
(
4
), p.
042902
.
7.
Queipo
,
N. V.
,
Goicochea
,
J. V.
, and
Pintos
,
S.
,
2002
, “
Surrogate Modeling-Based Optimization of SAGD Processes
,”
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
,
35
(
1
), pp.
83
93
.
8.
Lacroix
,
S.
,
Renard
,
G.
, and
Lemonnier
,
P.
,
2003
, “
Enhanced Numerical Simulations of ior Processes Through Dynamic Sub-Gridding
,”
Canadian International Petroleum Conference
, Calgary, AB, Canada, June 10–12,
PETSOC
Paper No. 2003-087.
9.
Lee
,
H.
,
Jin
,
J.
, and
Shin
,
H.
,
2015
, “
Efficient Prediction of SAGD Productions Using Static Factor Clustering
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
137
(
3
), p.
032907
.
10.
Rodríguez
,
G.
,
Soria
,
Á.
, and
Campo
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Artificial Intelligence in Service-Oriented Software Design
,”
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.
,
53
, pp.
86
104
.
11.
Kisi
,
Ö.
,
2004
, “
River Flow Modeling Using Artificial Neural Networks
,”
J. Hydrol. Eng.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
60
63
.
12.
Toffolo
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Fuzzy Expert Systems for the Diagnosis of Component and Sensor Faults in Complex Energy Systems
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
131
(
4
), p.
042002
.
13.
Haykin
,
S. S.
,
2009
,
Neural Networks and Learning Machines
,
3rd ed.
,
Pearson
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
.
14.
Bravo
,
C. E.
,
Saputelli
,
L.
, and
Rivas
,
F.
,
2014
, “
State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Analytics in the E&P Industry: A Technology Survey
,”
SPE J.
,
19
(
4
), pp.
547
563
.
15.
Adibifard
,
M.
,
Tabatabaei-Nejad
,
S.
, and
Khodapanah
,
E.
,
2014
, “
Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to Estimate Reservoir Parameters in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs Using Well Test Data
,”
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
,
122
, pp.
585
594
.
16.
Jahanbakhshi
,
R.
, and
Keshavarzi
,
R.
,
2016
, “
Intelligent Classifier Approach for Prediction and Sensitivity Analysis of Differential Pipe Sticking: A Comparative Study
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
138
(
5
), p.
052904
.
17.
Khamehchi
,
E.
,
Kivi
,
I. R.
, and
Akbari
,
M.
,
2014
, “
A Novel Approach to Sand Production Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence
,”
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
,
123
, pp.
147
154
.
18.
Li
,
X.
,
Chan
,
C.
, and
Nguyen
,
H.
,
2013
, “
Application of the Neural Decision Tree Approach for Prediction of Petroleum Production
,”
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
,
104
, pp.
11
16
.
19.
Foroud
,
T.
,
Seifi
,
A.
, and
Amin Shahidi
,
B.
,
2014
, “
Assisted History Matching Using Artificial Neural Network Based Global Optimization Method–Applications to Brugge Field and a Fractured Iranian Reservoir
,”
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
,
123
, pp.
46
61
.
20.
Wang
,
Y.
, and
Salehi
,
S.
,
2015
, “
Application of Real-Time Field Data to Optimize Drilling Hydraulics Using Neural Network Approach
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
137
(
6
), p.
062903
.
21.
Awoleke
,
O.
, and
Lane
,
R.
,
2011
, “
Analysis of Data From the Barnett Shale Using Conventional Statistical and Virtual Intelligence Techniques
,”
SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng.
,
14
(
5
), pp.
544
556
.
22.
Ayala
,
H. L. F.
, and
Ertekin
,
T.
,
2007
, “
Neuro-Simulation Analysis of Pressure Maintenance Operations in Gas Condensate Reservoirs
,”
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
,
58
(
1
), pp.
207
226
.
23.
Manshad
,
A. K.
,
Rostami
,
H.
, and
Hosseini
,
S. M.
,
2016
, “
Application of Artificial Neural Network-Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Prediction of Gas Condensate Dew Point Pressure and Comparison With Gaussian Processes Regression-Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
138
(
3
), p.
032903
.
24.
Ma
,
Z.
,
Leung
,
J. Y.
,
Zanon
,
S. D.
, and
Dzurman
,
P. J.
,
2014
, “
Practical Implementation of Knowledge-Based Approaches for SAGD Production Analysis
,”
SPE Heavy Oil Conference Canada
, Calgary, AB, Canada, June 10–12,
SPE
Paper No. 170144.
25.
Ma
,
Z.
,
Leung
,
J. Y.
, and
Zanon
,
S.
,
2015
, “
Practical Implementation of Knowledge-Based Approaches for Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Production Analysis
,”
Expert Syst. Appl.
,
42
(
21
), pp.
7326
7343
.
26.
Jolliffe
,
I.
,
2002
,
Principal Component Analysis
, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
27.
Amirian
,
E.
,
Leung
,
J. Y.
, and
Zanon
,
S.
,
2015
, “
Integrated Cluster Analysis and Artificial Neural Network Modeling for Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Performance Prediction in Heterogeneous Reservoirs
,”
Expert Syst. Appl.
,
42
(
2
), pp.
723
740
.
28.
MacQueen
,
J.
,
1967
, “
Some Methods for Classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations
,”
Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability
, Berkeley, CA, Vol.
1
, pp.
281
297
.
29.
Bahrololoum
,
A.
,
Nezamabadi-Pour
,
H.
, and
Saryazdi
,
S.
,
2015
, “
A Data Clustering Approach Based on Universal Gravity Rule
,”
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.
,
45
, pp.
415
428
.
30.
Shlens
,
J.
,
2014
, “
A Tutorial on Principal Component Analysis
,” Cornell University, Cornell, NY,
Preprint arXiv: 1404.1100
.
31.
Hammouda
,
K.
,
2000
, “
A Comparative Study of Data Clustering Techniques
,” SYDE 625: Tools of Intelligent Systems Design, Course Project.
32.
Noureldin
,
A.
,
El-Shafie
,
A.
, and
Taha
,
M. R.
,
2007
, “
Optimizing Neuro-Fuzzy Modules for Data Fusion of Vehicular Navigation Systems Using Temporal Cross-Validation
,”
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.
,
20
(
1
), pp.
49
61
.
33.
Wei
,
T.
,
2014
, “
Corrplot: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix, R Package Version 0.73
,” https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/corrplot/index.html
34.
Sung
,
A.
,
1998
, “
Ranking Importance of Input Parameters of Neural Networks
,”
Expert Syst. Appl.
,
15
(
3
), pp.
405
411
.
You do not currently have access to this content.