Gasoline compression ignition (GCI), also known as partially premixed compression ignition (PPCI) and gasoline direct injection compression ignition (GDICI), engines have been considered an attractive alternative to traditional spark ignition (SI) engines. Lean-burn combustion with the direct injection of fuel eliminates throttle losses for higher thermodynamic efficiencies, and the precise control of the mixture compositions allows better emission performance such as NOx and particulate matter (PM). Recently, low octane gasoline fuel has been identified as a viable option for the GCI engine applications due to its longer ignition delay characteristics compared to diesel and lighter evaporation compared to gasoline fuel (Chang et al., 2012, “Enabling High Efficiency Direct Injection Engine With Naphtha Fuel Through Partially Premixed Charge Compression Ignition Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-01-0677). The feasibility of such a concept has been demonstrated by experimental investigations at Saudi Aramco (Chang et al., 2012, “Enabling High Efficiency Direct Injection Engine With Naphtha Fuel Through Partially Premixed Charge Compression Ignition Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-01-0677; Chang et al., 2013, “Fuel Economy Potential of Partially Premixed Compression Ignition (PPCI) Combustion With Naphtha Fuel,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2013-01-2701). The present study aims to develop predictive capabilities for low octane gasoline fuel compression ignition (CI) engines with accurate characterization of the spray dynamics and combustion processes. Full three-dimensional simulations were conducted using converge as a basic modeling framework, using Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) turbulent mixing models. An outwardly opening hollow-cone spray injector was characterized and validated against existing and new experimental data. An emphasis was made on the spray penetration characteristics. Various spray breakup and collision models have been tested and compared with the experimental data. An optimum combination has been identified and applied in the combusting GCI simulations. Linear instability sheet atomization (LISA) breakup model and modified Kelvin–Helmholtz and Rayleigh–Taylor (KH-RT) break models proved to work the best for the investigated injector. Comparisons between various existing spray models and a parametric study have been carried out to study the effects of various spray parameters. The fuel effects have been tested by using three different primary reference fuel (PRF) and toluene primary reference fuel (TPRF) surrogates. The effects of fuel temperature and chemical kinetic mechanisms have also been studied. The heating and evaporative characteristics of the low octane gasoline fuel and its PRF and TPRF surrogates were examined.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2016
Research-Article
Numerical Simulations of Hollow-Cone Injection and Gasoline Compression Ignition Combustion With Naphtha Fuels
Jihad A. Badra,
Jihad A. Badra
Fuel Technology Division,
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: jihad.badra@aramco.com
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: jihad.badra@aramco.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Jaeheon Sim,
Jaeheon Sim
Clean Combustion Research Center,
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: jaeheon.sim@kaust.edu.sa
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: jaeheon.sim@kaust.edu.sa
Search for other works by this author on:
Ahmed Elwardany,
Ahmed Elwardany
Clean Combustion Research Center,
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia;
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia;
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Faculty of Engineering,
Alexandria University,
Alexandria 21544, Egypt
e-mail: ahmed.elwardani@kaust.edu.sa
Faculty of Engineering,
Alexandria University,
Alexandria 21544, Egypt
e-mail: ahmed.elwardani@kaust.edu.sa
Search for other works by this author on:
Mohammed Jaasim,
Mohammed Jaasim
Clean Combustion Research Center,
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: mohammedjaasim.mubarakali@kaust.edu.sa
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: mohammedjaasim.mubarakali@kaust.edu.sa
Search for other works by this author on:
Yoann Viollet,
Yoann Viollet
Fuel Technology Division,
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: yoann.viollet@aramco.com
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: yoann.viollet@aramco.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Junseok Chang,
Junseok Chang
Fuel Technology Division,
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: junseok.chang@aramco.com
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: junseok.chang@aramco.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Amer Amer,
Amer Amer
Fuel Technology Division,
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: amer.amer.4@aramco.com
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: amer.amer.4@aramco.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Hong G. Im
Hong G. Im
Clean Combustion Research Center,
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: hong.im@kaust.edu.sa
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: hong.im@kaust.edu.sa
Search for other works by this author on:
Jihad A. Badra
Fuel Technology Division,
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: jihad.badra@aramco.com
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: jihad.badra@aramco.com
Jaeheon Sim
Clean Combustion Research Center,
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: jaeheon.sim@kaust.edu.sa
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: jaeheon.sim@kaust.edu.sa
Ahmed Elwardany
Clean Combustion Research Center,
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia;
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia;
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Faculty of Engineering,
Alexandria University,
Alexandria 21544, Egypt
e-mail: ahmed.elwardani@kaust.edu.sa
Faculty of Engineering,
Alexandria University,
Alexandria 21544, Egypt
e-mail: ahmed.elwardani@kaust.edu.sa
Mohammed Jaasim
Clean Combustion Research Center,
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: mohammedjaasim.mubarakali@kaust.edu.sa
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: mohammedjaasim.mubarakali@kaust.edu.sa
Yoann Viollet
Fuel Technology Division,
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: yoann.viollet@aramco.com
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: yoann.viollet@aramco.com
Junseok Chang
Fuel Technology Division,
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: junseok.chang@aramco.com
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: junseok.chang@aramco.com
Amer Amer
Fuel Technology Division,
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: amer.amer.4@aramco.com
R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran,
Eastern Province 31311, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: amer.amer.4@aramco.com
Hong G. Im
Clean Combustion Research Center,
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: hong.im@kaust.edu.sa
King Abdullah University of
Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Makkah Province 23955, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: hong.im@kaust.edu.sa
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Internal Combustion Engine Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received January 6, 2016; final manuscript received January 12, 2016; published online February 23, 2016. Editor: Hameed Metghalchi.
J. Energy Resour. Technol. Sep 2016, 138(5): 052202 (11 pages)
Published Online: February 23, 2016
Article history
Received:
January 6, 2016
Revised:
January 12, 2016
Citation
Badra, J. A., Sim, J., Elwardany, A., Jaasim, M., Viollet, Y., Chang, J., Amer, A., and Im, H. G. (February 23, 2016). "Numerical Simulations of Hollow-Cone Injection and Gasoline Compression Ignition Combustion With Naphtha Fuels." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. September 2016; 138(5): 052202. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032622
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Modeling Mixture Formation in a Gasoline Direct Injection Engine
J. Appl. Mech (November,2006)
Dilution Sensitivity of Particulate Matter Emissions From Reactivity-Controlled Compression Ignition Combustion
J. Energy Resour. Technol (May,2017)
Quasidimensional Modeling of Diesel Combustion Using Detailed Chemical Kinetics
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (August,2017)
Computational Study to Identify Feasible Operating Space for a Mixed Mode Combustion Strategy—A Pathway for Premixed Compression Ignition High Load Operation
J. Energy Resour. Technol (August,2018)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Reciprocating Engine Performance Characteristics
Fundamentals of heat Engines: Reciprocating and Gas Turbine Internal Combustion Engines
Lay-Up and Start-Up Practices
Consensus on Operating Practices for Control of Water and Steam Chemistry in Combined Cycle and Cogeneration
Internal and Near Nozzle Flow Simulations of Gasoline Multi-Hole Injector (ECN Spray G) with Transient Needle Motion
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)