As demand for electricity in the U.S. continues to increase, it is necessary to explore the means through which the modern power supply system can accommodate both increasing affluence (which is accompanied by increased per-capita consumption) and the continually growing global population. Though there has been a great deal of research into the theoretical optimization of large-scale power systems, research into the use of an existing power system as a foundation for this growth has yet to be fully explored. Current successful and robust power generation systems that have significant renewable energy penetration—despite not having been optimized a priori—can be used to inform the advancement of modern power systems to accommodate the increasing demand for electricity. This work explores how an accurate and state-of-the-art computational model of a large, regional energy system can be employed as part of an overarching power systems optimization scheme that looks to inform the decision making process for next generation power supply systems. Research scenarios that explore an introductory multi-objective power flow analysis for a case study involving a regional portion of a large grid will be explored, along with a discussion of future research directions.

References

References
1.
Office of the National Coordinator for Smart Grid Interoperability
,
2012
,
NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 2.0
,
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,
Gaithersburg, MD
.
2.
U.S. Energy Information Administration
,
2014
, “
Annual Energy Outlook 2014 With Projections to 2040
,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo
3.
Happ
,
H.
,
1973
, “
The Operation and Control of Large Interconnected Power Systems
,”
IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory
,
20
(
3
), pp.
212
222
.
4.
Pan European Grid Advanced Simulation and State Estimation (PEGASE)
,
2011
, “
Algorithmic Requirements for Simulation of Large Network Extreme Scenarios
,” http://www.fp7-pegase.com/pdf/D4.1.pdf
5.
Cotilla-Sanchez
,
E.
,
Hines
,
P.
,
Barrows
,
C.
,
Blumsack
,
S.
, and
Patel
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Multi-Attribute Partitioning of Power Networks Based on Electrical Distance
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
,
28
(
4
), pp.
4978
4987
.
6.
Mavris
,
D. N.
, and
Griendling
,
K.
,
2011
, “
Relational Oriented Systems Engineering and Technology Tradeoff Analysis (ROSETTA) Environment
,”
IEEE 6th International Conference on Systems Engineering
(
SoSE
), Albuquerque, NM, June 27–30, pp.
49
54
.
7.
ReVelle
,
J. B.
,
Moran
,
J. W.
, and
Cox
,
C. A.
,
1996
,
The QFD Handbook
,
Wiley
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
8.
Cano-Andrade
,
S.
,
von Spakovsky
,
M. R.
,
Fuentes
,
A.
,
Lo Prete
,
C.
, and
Mili
,
L.
,
2015
, “
Upper Level of a Sustainability Assessment Framework for Power System Planning
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
137
(
4
), p.
041601
.
9.
Facci
,
A. L.
,
Andreassi
,
L.
,
Martini
,
F.
, and
Ubertini
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Comparing Energy and Cost Optimization in Distributed Energy Systems Management
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
136
(
3
), p.
32001
.
10.
Franco
,
A.
, and
Vazquez
,
A.
,
2006
, “
A Thermodynamic Based Approach for the Multicriteria Assessment of Energy Conversion Systems
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
128
(
4
), pp.
346
351
.
11.
Widiyanto
,
A.
,
Kato
,
S.
, and
Maruyama
,
N.
,
2004
, “
Optimizing Selection of Appropriate Power Generation Systems in Indonesia by Using Distance Based Approach Method
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
126
(
1
), pp.
63
71
.
12.
The Mathworks, Inc.
,
2011
, MATLAB Version 7.13.0.564, Natick, MA.
13.
Zimmerman
,
R. D.
, and
Murillo-Sanchez
,
C. E.
,
2011
,
MATPOWER 4.1 User's Manual
,
Power Systems Engineering Research Center
,
Tempe, AZ
, pp.
1
116
.
14.
Glover
,
J. D.
,
Sarma
,
M. S.
, and
Overbye
,
T. J.
,
2012
,
Power System Analysis and Design
,
Cengage Learning
,
Samford, CT
.
15.
Zimmerman
,
R. D.
,
Murillo-Sanchez
,
C. E.
, and
Thomas
,
R. J.
,
2011
, “
MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
,
26
(
1
), pp.
12
19
.
16.
Phoenix Integration
,
2011
,
ModelCenter Basics, Phoenix Integration Inc.
,
Blacksburg, VA
.
17.
WECC,
2014
,
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
,
Salt Lake City, UT
, https://www.wecc.biz/Pages/About.aspx
18.
NERC
,
2013
, “
North American Regional Reliability Councils and Interconnections
,” North American Reliability Corporation, Atlanta, GA, http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f4/NERC-map-en.svg/2000px-NERC-map-en.svg.png
19.
PowerWorld
,
2008
, “
Power System Equivalents' Online Training
,” PowerWorld Corp., Champaign, IL, http://www.powerworld.com/files/TrainingI14Equivalents.pdf
20.
Energy Visuals
,
2014
, “
Transmission Atlas WECC Data
,”
Energy Visuals, Inc.
,
Champaign, IL
.
You do not currently have access to this content.