A comparative assessment is made of two implementations of the rate-controlled constrained-equilibrium (RCCE) method. These are the constraint and constraint potential formulations in which rate equations are solved for the RCCE constraints and constraint potentials, respectively. The two forms are equivalent mathematically; however, they involve different numerical procedures and thus show different computational performance. The main objective of this study is to compare the accuracy and numerical efficiency of the two formulations to attain the most effective implementation of the RCCE in turbulent combustion simulations. The RCCE method is applied to study methane oxygen combustion in an adiabatic, isobaric well stirred reactor. Simulations are carried out over a wide range of initial temperatures and equivalence ratios. Performance studies are conducted and RCCE results are compared with those obtained by direct integration of detailed chemical kinetics. The results show that both methods provide very accurate representation of the kinetics. It is also demonstrated that while the constraint form involves less numerical stiffness, the constraint potential implementation results in more saving in computation time.
A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled Constraint-Equilibrium Method
and Industrial Engineering,
Boston, MA 02115
Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received July 10, 2015; final manuscript received September 14, 2015; published online October 15, 2015. Editor: Hameed Metghalchi.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Hadi, F., and H. Sheikhi, M. R. (October 15, 2015). "A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled Constraint-Equilibrium Method." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. March 2016; 138(2): 022202. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031614
Download citation file: