A comparative assessment is made of two implementations of the rate-controlled constrained-equilibrium (RCCE) method. These are the constraint and constraint potential formulations in which rate equations are solved for the RCCE constraints and constraint potentials, respectively. The two forms are equivalent mathematically; however, they involve different numerical procedures and thus show different computational performance. The main objective of this study is to compare the accuracy and numerical efficiency of the two formulations to attain the most effective implementation of the RCCE in turbulent combustion simulations. The RCCE method is applied to study methane oxygen combustion in an adiabatic, isobaric well stirred reactor. Simulations are carried out over a wide range of initial temperatures and equivalence ratios. Performance studies are conducted and RCCE results are compared with those obtained by direct integration of detailed chemical kinetics. The results show that both methods provide very accurate representation of the kinetics. It is also demonstrated that while the constraint form involves less numerical stiffness, the constraint potential implementation results in more saving in computation time.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2016
Research-Article
A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled Constraint-Equilibrium Method
Fatemeh Hadi,
Fatemeh Hadi
Department of Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115
and Industrial Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115
Search for other works by this author on:
M. Reza H. Sheikhi
M. Reza H. Sheikhi
Department of Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115
e-mail: pourmohamadhadifar.f@husky.neu.edu
and Industrial Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115
e-mail: pourmohamadhadifar.f@husky.neu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Fatemeh Hadi
Department of Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115
and Industrial Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115
M. Reza H. Sheikhi
Department of Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115
e-mail: pourmohamadhadifar.f@husky.neu.edu
and Industrial Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115
e-mail: pourmohamadhadifar.f@husky.neu.edu
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received July 10, 2015; final manuscript received September 14, 2015; published online October 15, 2015. Editor: Hameed Metghalchi.
J. Energy Resour. Technol. Mar 2016, 138(2): 022202 (9 pages)
Published Online: October 15, 2015
Article history
Received:
July 10, 2015
Revised:
September 14, 2015
Citation
Hadi, F., and H. Sheikhi, M. R. (October 15, 2015). "A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled Constraint-Equilibrium Method." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. March 2016; 138(2): 022202. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031614
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Ignition Delay and Combustion Characteristics of Gaseous Fuel Jets
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2010)
Spectral Radiation Analysis of Premixed Oxy-Methane Flames
J. Heat Transfer (August,2019)
Numerical Investigation of Combustion and Emission With Different Diesel Surrogate Fuel by Hybrid Breakup Model
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2019)
Reduced Chemical Kinetic Mechanisms for Oxy/Methane Supercritical CO 2 Combustor Simulations
J. Energy Resour. Technol (September,2018)
Related Chapters
Numerical Simulation Research on a Fixed Bed Gasifier
International Conference on Information Technology and Management Engineering (ITME 2011)
Lay-Up and Start-Up Practices
Consensus on Operating Practices for Control of Water and Steam Chemistry in Combined Cycle and Cogeneration
A Simple Carburetor
Case Studies in Fluid Mechanics with Sensitivities to Governing Variables