In order to meet the increasing demand for low carbon and renewable transportation fuels, a methodology for systematically establishing build-out scenarios is desirable. In an effort to minimize initial investment costs associated with the development of fueling infrastructure, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) has been developed and applied, as an illustration, to the case of hydrogen fueling infrastructure deployment in the State of California. In this study, five parameters are selected in order to rank hydrogen transportation fuel generation locations within the State. In order to utilize meaningful weighting factors within the AHP, expert inputs were gathered and employed in the exercising of the models suite of weighting parameters. The analysis uses statewide geographic information and identifies both key energy infrastructure expansion locations and critical criteria that make the largest impact in the location of selected sites.

References

References
1.
U.S. Energy Information Agency, 2013, “
International Energy Outlook 2013—Energy Information Administration
,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/index.cfm
2.
U.S. EPA
,
2013
,
Code of Federal Regulations (Annual Edition): Protection of Environment. Subpart C: Section 107 Attainment Status Designations
, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
3.
Air Resources Board, 2014, “Climate Change Programs,” California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA, accessed Feb. 18,
2014
, http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/cc.htm
4.
Air Resources Board, 2008, “
Senate Bill 375 Regional Targets
,” California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA, http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/sb375.htm
5.
Air Resources Board, 2013, “
Climate Change for Mobile Sources
,” California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA, http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ccms/ccms.htm
6.
California Energy Commission and California Air Resources Board
,
2007
, “
State Alternative Fuels Plan
,” Report No. CEC-600-2007-011-CMF, http://www.energy.ca.gov/2007publications/CEC-600-2007-011/CEC-600-2007-011-CMF.PDF.
7.
Muench
,
T. R.
,
2012
,
California's Hydrogen Infrastructure Funding Program
,”
ECS Trans.
,
42
(
1
), pp.
91
94
.
8.
Air Resources Board, 2013, “
Subject Top Page: AB 118 Air Quality Improvement Program
,” California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA, accessed Feb. 18, 2014, http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/aqip/bkgrnd.htm
9.
Air Resources Board, 2013, “
Historical Activities of the CA Hydrogen Highway Network
,” California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA, http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/zevprog/hydrogen/hydrogen_cah2net.htm
10.
Office of Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr., “
Executive Order S-7-04
,” http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/energy/ExecOrderS-7-04.htm
11.
Office of Governor Edmund
G.
Brown
, Jr.
,
2013
, “
ZEV Action Plan
,” .
12.
California Environmental Protection Agency
,
2010
, “
Facts About Environmental and Energy Standards for Hydrogen Production (SB 1505)
,”
13.
Bushan
,
N.
, and
Rajkumar
,
R.
,
2004
,
Strategic Decision Making Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process
,
Springer-Verlag
,
London
, p.
172
.
14.
Brey
,
J. J.
,
Carazo
,
A. F.
, and
Brey
,
R.
,
2012
, “
Using AHP and Binary Integer Programming to Optimize the Initial Distribution of Hydrogen Infrastructures in Andalusia
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
37
(
6
), pp.
5372
5384
.
15.
Pilavachi
,
P. A.
,
Chatzipanagi
,
A. I.
, and
Spyropoulou
,
A. I.
,
2009
, “
Evaluation of Hydrogen Production Methods Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
34
(
13
), pp.
5294
5303
.
16.
Winebrake
,
J. J.
, and
Creswick
,
B. P.
,
2003
, “
The Future of Hydrogen Fueling Systems for Transportation: An Application of Perspective-Based Scenario Analysis Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
,”
Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change
,
70
(
4
), pp.
359
384
.
17.
Heo
,
E.
,
Kim
,
J.
, and
Cho
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Selecting Hydrogen Production Methods Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process With Opportunities, Costs, and Risks
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
37
(
23
), pp.
17655
17662
.
18.
Vahdani
,
B.
,
Mousavi
,
S. M.
, and
Tavakkoli-Moghaddam
,
R.
,
2013
, “
Plant Location Selection by Using a Three-Step Methodology: Delphi-AHP-VIKOR
,”
World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol.
,
7
(
6
), pp.
1883
1886
.
19.
Tavakkoli-Moghaddam
,
R.
,
Mousavi
,
S. M.
, and
Heydar
,
M.
,
2011
, “
An Integrated AHP-VIKOR Methodology for Plant Location Selection
,”
Int. J. Eng.
,
24
(
2
), pp.
127
137
.
20.
Mousavi
,
S. M.
,
Tavakkoli-Moghaddam
,
R.
,
Heydar
,
M.
, and
Ebrahimnejad
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Plant Location Selection: An Integrated Delphi–AHP–PROMETHEE Methodology
,”
Arab. J. Sci. Eng.
,
38
(
5
), pp.
1255
1268
.
21.
Alonseo
,
J.
, and
Lamata
,
M.
,
2006
,
Consistency in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A New Approach
,”
Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst.
,
14
(
4
), pp.
445
459
.
22.
Zillow, 2014, “
California Home Prices and Home Values—Zillow Local Info
,” accessed Jan. 30,
2014
, http://www.zillow.com/local-info/CA-home-value/r_9?disambig=9827_51231_44405_37693&pri=9#metric=mt=11&dt=1&tp=5&rt=6&r=9%2C12447%2C54296%2C33839&el=0
23.
King
,
C.
, and
Webber
,
M. E.
,
2008
, “
Water Intensity of Transportation
,”
Am. Chem. Soc.
,
42
(
21
), pp.
7866
7872
.
24.
California Energy Commission
, “
Energy Maps of California—California Energy Commission
,” accessed Mar. 28, 2014, http://www.energy.ca.gov/maps/
You do not currently have access to this content.