This paper focuses on evaluating the impact of friction and contact pressure on helical steel tubes. The initial gaps between steel tubes and adjacent layers, friction coefficients and the contact stiffness are the main factors that affect such investigation. A novel methodology by using UFLEX2D (a MARINTEK product) has been applied for modeling complex umbilical cross sections and for the study of these parameters. Two cross sections for the same subsea application but with different designs have been investigated in the study. It has been shown how fatigue damage can be significantly impacted by different cross-sectional design. For this study, nonlinear moment/curvature relationship has been included in the analyses. Based on the findings of this study, more realistic results can be achieved by including the nonlinear behavior in global analysis for fatigue damage calculations instead of using nominal bending stiffness supplied by umbilical manufacturer.

References

1.
Knapp
,
R. H.
, and
Chiu
,
E. Y. C.
,
1998
, “
Tension Fatigue Model for Helically Wound Cable
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
110
(
1
), pp.
12
18
.10.1115/1.3231353
2.
Kavanagh
,
W. K.
,
Doynov
,
K.
,
Gallagher
,
D.
, and
Bai
,
Y.
,
2004
, “
The Effects of Tube Friction on the Fatigue Life of Steel Tube Umbilical Riser—New Approaches to Evaluating Fatigue Life Using Enhanced Nonlinear Time Domain Methods
,”
Offshore Technology Conference
(
OTC
), Houston TX, Paper No. 16631.10.4043/16631-MS
3.
Costello
,
G. A.
,
1983
, “
Stresses in Multilayered Cables
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
105
(
3
), pp.
337
340
.10.1115/1.3230924
4.
Raoof
,
M.
, and
Hobbs
,
R. E.
,
1984
, “
The Bending of Spiral Strand and Armored Cables Close to Termination
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
106
(
3
), pp.
349
355
.10.1115/1.3231064
5.
Kurt
,
J. P.
,
1984
, “
Empirical Factors in Prediction of Helically Armored Cable Axial Stiffeness
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
106
(
4
), pp.
521
526
.10.1115/1.3231117
6.
Saevik
,
S.
,
1992
, “
On Stresses and Fatigue in Flexible Pipes
,” Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondeheim, Norway.
7.
McNamara
,
J. F.
, and
Harte
,
A. M.
,
1989
, “
Three Dimensional Analytic Simulation of Flexible Pipe Wall Structure
,”
Proceedings of the Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference (OMAE)
, Vol.
1
, pp.
477
482
.
8.
Feret
,
J.
, and
Bournazel
,
H.
,
1987
, “
Calculation of Stresses and Slip in Structural Layers of Unbonded Flexible Pipes
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
109
(
3
), pp.
263
269
.10.1115/1.3257019
9.
Witz
,
J.
, and
Tan
,
Z.
,
1996
, “
A Case Study in the Cross-Section Analysis of Flexible Risers
,”
J. Mar. Struct.
,
9
(
9
), pp.
885
904
.10.1016/0951-8339(95)00035-6
10.
Saevik
,
S.
, and
Ekeberg
,
K. L.
,
2002
, “
Non-Linear Stress Analysis of Complex Umbilical Cross-Sections
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2002-28126.10.1115/OMAE2002-28126
11.
Sodahl
,
N.
,
Skeie
,
G.
,
Steinkjer
,
O.
, and
Kalleklev
,
A. J.
,
2010
, “
Efficient Fatigue Analysis of Helix Elements in Umbilicals and Flexible Risers
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2010-21012.10.1115/OMAE2010-21012
12.
Qing-zhen
,
L.
,
Gang
,
W.
,
Zhi-xun
,
Y.
,
Ming-gang
,
T.
,
Jun
,
Y.
, and
Qian-jin
,
Y.
,
2011
,“
Cross-Section Layout Design of Steel Tube Umbilical Based on Finite Element Analysis
,”
Proceedings of the Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference (OMAE)
, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Paper No. 2011-49662.
13.
Saevik
,
S.
,
Gjosteen
,
J. K.
, and
Figenschou
,
A.
,
2006
, “
Comparison Between Predicted and Measured Umbilical Bending Stresses During Manufacturing
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2006-92563.10.1115/OMAE2006-92563
14.
Le Corre
,
V.
, and
Probyn
,
I.
,
2009
, “
Validation of a 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Model of a Deep Water Steel Tube Umbilical in Combined Tension and Cyclic Bending
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2009-79168.10.1115/OMAE2009-79168
15.
Pesce
,
C. P.
,
Ramos
, Jr.
R.
,
Yamada da Silveira
,
L. M.
,
Tanaka
,
R. L.
,
Marins
,
C. A.
,
Takafuji
,
F. C. M.
,
Novaes
,
J. P. Z.
, and
Godinho
,
C. A. F.
,
2010
, “
Structural Behavior of Umbilicals—Part I: Mathematical Modeling
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2010-2089210.1115/OMAE2010-20892.
16.
Pesce
,
C. P.
,
Ramos
, Jr.
R.
,
Yamada da Silveira
,
L. M.
,
Tanaka
,
R. L.
,
Marins
,
C. A.
,
Takafuji
,
F. C. M.
,
Novaes
,
J. P. Z.
, and
Godinho
,
C. A. F.
,
2010
, “
Structural Behavior of Umbilicals—Part II: Model-Experimental Comparison
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2010-20895.10.1115/OMAE2010-20895
You do not currently have access to this content.