Improving the efficiency of thermodynamic cycles plays a fundamental role in reducing the cost of solar power plants. These plants work normally with Rankine cycles which present some disadvantages due to the thermodynamic behavior of steam at low pressures. These disadvantages can be reduced by introducing alternatives such as combined cycles which combine the best features of each cycle. In this paper, a combined Rankine–Goswami cycle (RGC) is proposed and a thermodynamic analysis is conducted. The Goswami cycle, used as a bottoming cycle, uses ammonia–water mixture as the working fluid and produces power and refrigeration while power is the primary goal. This bottoming cycle, reduces the energy losses in the traditional condenser and eliminates the high specific volume and poor vapor quality presented in the last stages of the lower pressure turbine in the Rankine cycle. In addition, the use of absorption condensation in the Goswami cycle, for regeneration of the strong solution, allows operating the low pressure side of the cycle above atmospheric pressure which eliminates the need for maintaining a vacuum pressure in the condenser. The performance of the proposed combined Rankine–Goswami cycle, under full load, was investigated for applications in parabolic trough solar thermal plants for a range from 40 to 50 MW sizes. A sensitivity analysis to study the effect of the ammonia concentration, condenser pressure, and rectifier concentration on the cycle efficiency, network, and cooling was performed. The results indicate that the proposed RGC provide a difference in net power output between 15.7% and 42.3% for condenser pressures between 1 and 9 bars. The maximum effective first law and exergy efficiencies for an ammonia mass fraction of 0.5 are calculated as 36.7% and 24.7%, respectively, for the base case (no superheater or rectifier process).

References

References
1.
Senthil Murugan
,
R.
, and
Subbarao
,
P.
, 2008, “
Effective Utilization of Low-Grade Steam in an Ammonia-Water Cycle
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
,
222
(
2
), pp.
161
166
.
2.
Mittelman
,
G.
, and
Epstein
,
M.
, 2010, “
A Novel Power Block for CSP Systems
,”
Sol. Energy
,
84
(
10
), pp.
1761
1771
.
3.
Kalina
,
A.
, 1983, “
Combined Cycle and Waste Heat Recovery Power Systems Based on a Novel Thermodynamic Energy Cycle Utilizing Low-Temperature Heat for Power Generation
,”
Joint Power Generation Conference ASME, Paper No. 83-JPGC-GT-3
.
4.
Kalina
,
A.
, 1984, “
Combined-Cycle System With Novel Bottoming Cycle
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
106
, p.
737
.
5.
Marston
,
C.
, 1990, “
Parametric Analysis of the Kalina Cycle
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
112
, p.
107
.
6.
Park
,
Y.
, and
Sonntag
,
R.
, 1990, “
A Preliminary Study of the Kalina Power Cycle in Connection With a Combined Cycle System
,”
Int. J. Energy Res.
,
14
(
2
), pp.
153
162
.
7.
El Sayed
,
Y.
, and
Tribus
,
M.
, 1985, “
A Theoretical Comparison of Rankine and Kalina Cycles
,”
Proceedings of Analysis of Energy Systems, Design and Operation, presented at the Winter Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, Miami Beach, Florida, Nov. 17–22, 1985,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, p.
97
.
8.
Hettiarachchi
,
H. D. M.
,
Golubovic
,
M.
,
Worek
,
W. M.
, and
Ikegami
,
Y.
, 2007, “
The Performance of the Kalina Cycle System 11(kcs-11) With Low-Temperature Heat Sources
,”
J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
129
(
3
), pp.
243
247
.
9.
Dejfors
,
C.
,
Thorin
,
E.
, and
Svedberg
,
G.
, 1998, “
Ammonia-Water Power Cycles for Direct-Fired Cogeneration Applications
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
39
(
16-18
), pp.
1675
1681
.
10.
Murugan
,
R.
, and
Subbarao
,
P.
, 2010, “
Thermodynamic Analysis of Rankine-Kalina Combined Cycle
,”
Int. J. Thermodyn.
,
11
(
3
), pp.
133
141
.
11.
Jonsson
,
M.
, and
Yan
,
J.
, 2001, “
Ammonia-Water Bottoming Cycles: A Comparison Between Gas Engines and Gas Diesel Engines as Prime Movers
,”
Energy
,
26
(
1
), pp.
31
44
.
12.
Zhang
,
N.
, and
Lior
,
N.
, 2007, “
Development of a Novel Combined Absorption Cycle for Power Generation and Refrigeration
,”
J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
129
, pp.
254
265
.
13.
Khaliq
,
A.
,
Kumar
,
R.
, and
Dincer
,
I.
, 2009, “
Exergy Analysis of an Industrial Waste Heat Recovery Based Cogeneration Cycle for Combined Production of Power and Refrigeration
,”
J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
131
, p.
022402
.
14.
Ryu
,
C.
,
Tiffany
,
D. R.
,
Crittenden
,
J. F.
,
Lear
,
W. E.
, and
Sherif
,
S. A.
, 2010, “
Dynamic Modeling of a Novel Cooling, Heat, Power, and Water Microturbine Combined Cycle
,”
J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
132
(
2
), p.
021006
.
15.
Boza
,
J. J.
,
Lear
,
W. E.
, and
Sherif
,
S. A.
, 2008, “
Performance of a Novel Semiclosed Gas-Turbine Refrigeration Combined Cycle
,”
J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
130
(
2
), p.
022401
.
16.
Goswami
,
D.
, “
Solar Thermal Power: Status of Technologies and Opportunities for Research
,”
Proceedings of Proceedings of the 2nd ISHMT-ASME Heat and Mass Transaction Conference
, pp.
57
60
.
17.
Goswami
,
D.
, 1998, “
Solar Thermal Power Technology: Present Status and Ideas for the Future
,”
Energy Sources
,
20
(
2
), pp.
137
145
.
18.
Vijayaraghavan
,
S.
, and
Goswami
,
D. Y.
, 2005, “
Organic Working Fluids for a Combined Power and Cooling Cycle
,”
J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
127
(
2
), pp.
125
130
.
19.
Demirkaya
,
G.
,
Vasquez Padilla
,
R.
,
Goswami
,
D.
,
Stefanakos
,
E.
, and
Rahman
,
M.
, 2010, “
Analysis of a Combined Power and Cooling Cycle for Low-Grade Heat Sources
,”
Int. J. Energy Res.
,
35
, pp.
1145
1157
.
20.
Vijayaraghavan
,
S.
, and
Goswami
,
D. Y.
, 2003, “
On Evaluating Efficiency of a Combined Power and Cooling Cycle
,”
J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
125
(
3
), pp.
221
227
.
21.
Xu
,
F.
, and
Goswami
,
D.
, 1999, “
Thermodynamic Properties of Ammonia-Water Mixtures for Power-Cycle Applications
,”
Energy
,
24
(
6
), pp.
525
536
.
22.
Moran
,
M. J.
, and
Shapiro
,
H. N.
, 2004,
Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, Student Problem Set Supplement
,
5 ed.
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
23.
Stodola
,
A.
, and
Loewenstein
,
L.
, 1927,
Steam and Gas Turbines, With a Supplement on the Prospects of the Thermal Prime Mover
,
Vol. 1
,
Peter Smith
,
New York
.
24.
Lutz
,
M.
, 2006,
Programming Python
,
O’Reilly Media, Inc
,
Sebastopol, CA
.
25.
Wagner
,
W.
,
Cooper
,
J.
,
Dittmann
,
A.
,
Kijima
,
J.
,
Kretzschmar
,
H.
,
Kruse
,
A.
,
Mareš
,
R.
,
Oguchi
,
K.
,
Sato
,
H.
,
Stöcker
,
I.
,
O.
,
Šifner
,
Y.
,
Takaishi
,
I.
,
Tanishita
,
J.
,
Trübenbach
, and
Th.
,
Willkommen
, 2000, “
The IAPWS Industrial Formulation 1997 for the Thermodynamic Properties of Water and Steam
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
122
, p.
150
.
26.
Vasquez Padilla
,
R.
,
Demirkaya
,
G.
,
Goswami
,
D.
,
Stefanakos
,
E.
, and
Rahman
,
M.
, 2010, “
Analysis of Power and Cooling Cogeneration Using Ammonia-Water Mixture
,”
Energy
,
35
(
12
), pp.
4649
4657
.
27.
Patnode
,
A. M.
, 2006, “
Simulation and Performance Evaluation of Parabolic Trough Solar Power Plants
,” Master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, College of Engineering, Madison, WI.
28.
Price
,
H.
,
Lüpfert
,
E.
,
Kearney
,
D.
,
Zarza
,
E.
,
Cohen
,
G.
,
Gee
,
R.
, and
Mahoney
,
R.
, 2002, “
Advances in Parabolic Trough Solar Power Technology
,”
J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
124
, p.
109
.
29.
Montes
,
M.
,
Abnades
,
A.
,
Martnez-Val
,
J.
, and
Valds
,
M.
, 2009, “
Solar Multiple Optimization for a Solar-Only Thermal Power Plant, Using Oil as Heat Transfer Fluid in the Parabolic Trough Collectors
,”
Sol. Energy
,
83
(
12
), pp.
2165
2176
.
30.
Habib
,
M.
,
Said
,
S.
, and
Al-Zaharna
,
I.
, 1999, “
Thermodynamic Optimization of Reheat Regenerative Thermal-Power Plants
,”
Appl. Energy
,
63
(
1
), pp.
17
34
.
31.
Dincer
,
I.
, and
Al-Muslim
,
H.
, 2001, “
Thermodynamic Analysis of Reheat Cycle Steam Power Plants
,”
Int. J. Energy Res.
,
25
(
8
), pp.
727
739
.
32.
Fraas
,
A.
, 1989,
Heat Exchanger Design
,
Wiley-Interscience
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.