The increased use of intermittent renewable power in the United States is forcing utilities to manage increasingly complex supply and demand interactions. This paper evaluates biomass pathways for hydrogen production and how they can be integrated with renewable resources to improve the efficiency, reliability, dispatchability, and cost of other renewable technologies. Two hybrid concepts were analyzed that involve coproduction of gaseous hydrogen and electric power from thermochemical biorefineries. Both of the concepts analyzed share the basic idea of combining intermittent wind-generated electricity with a biomass gasification plant. The systems were studied in detail for process feasibility and economic performance. The best performing system was estimated to produce hydrogen at a cost of $1.67/kg. The proposed hybrid systems seek to either fill energy shortfalls by supplying hydrogen to a peaking natural gas turbine or to absorb excess renewable power during low-demand hours. Direct leveling of intermittent renewable electricity production was proposed utilizing either an indirectly heated biomass gasifier or a directly heated biomass gasifier. The indirect gasification concepts studied were found to be cost competitive in cases where value is placed on controlling carbon emissions. A carbon tax in the range of $26–40 per metric ton of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emission makes the systems studied cost competitive with steam methane reforming (SMR) to produce hydrogen. The direct gasification concept studied replaces the air separation unit (ASU) with an electrolyzer bank and is unlikely to be cost competitive due to high capital costs. Based on a direct replacement of the ASU with electrolyzers, hydrogen can be produced for $0.27 premium per kilogram. Additionally, if a nonrenewable, grid-mix electricity is used, the hybrid system is found to be a net CO2e emitter.

References

References
1.
Milbrandt
,
A.
, 2005, “
A Geographic Perspective on the Current Biomass Resource Availability in the United States
,” National Renewable Energy Lab, Report No. TP-560-39181.
2.
Perlack
,
R.
,
Wright
,
L.
,
Turhollow
,
A.
,
Graham
,
R.
,
Stokes
,
B.
, and
Erbach
,
D.
, 2005,
Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply
,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
,
Oak 853 Ridge, TN
.
3.
Turner
,
J.
,
Sverdrup
,
G.
,
Mann
,
M.
,
Maness
,
P. C.
,
Kroposki
,
B.
,
Ghirardi
,
M.
,
Evans
,
J.
, and
Blake
,
D.
, 2008, “
Renewable Hydrogen Production
,”
Int. J. Energy Res.
,
32
, pp.
379
407
.
4.
U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2008, “
20% Wind Energy by 2030—Increasing Wind Energy’s Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply
,” Report No. GO-102008-2567.
5.
Levene
,
J.
,
Kroposki
,
B.
, and
Sverdrup
,
G.
, 2006, “
Wind Energy and Production of Hydrogen and Electricity–Opportunities for Renewable Hydrogen
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Report No. CP560-39534.
6.
Fingersh
,
L.
, 2004, “
Optimization of Utility-Scale Wind-Hydrogen-Battery Systems
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Report No. CP-500-36117.
7.
Dean
,
J.
,
Braun
,
R.
,
Munoz
,
D.
,
Penev
,
M.
, and
Kinchin
,
C.
, 2010, “
Analysis of Hybrid Hydrogen Systems – Final Report
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Report No. TP-46934.
8.
Gasification Technology Status – December 2006
,
EPRI, and the Gasification 869 Users Association
,
Palo Alto, CA
, p.
1012224
.
9.
Spath
,
P.
,
Aden
,
A.
,
Eggeman
,
T.
,
Ringer
,
M.
,
Wallace
,
B.
, and
Jechura
,
J.
, 2005, “
Biomass to Hydrogen Production Detailed Design and Economics Utilizing the Battelle Columbus Laboratory Indirectly-Heated Gasifier
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Report No. TP-510-37408.
10.
Dean
,
J.
, 2010, “
Leveling Intermittent Renewable Energy Production Through Biomass Gasification-based Hybrid Systems
,” M.S. thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.
11.
Devi
,
L.
,
Ptasinski
,
K.
,
Janssen
,
F.
, van
Paasen
,
S.
,
Bergman
,
P.
, and
Kiel
,
J.
, 2005, “
Catalytic Decomposition of Biomass Tars: Use of Dolomite an Untreated Olivine
,”
Renewable Energy
,
30
, pp.
565
587
.
12.
Heavy Duty Gas Turbine Products
, 2009,
General Electric Company
,
Fairfield, CT
.
13.
Drdar
,
D.
, and
Jones
,
R.
, 2000, “
GE IGCC Technology and Experience with Advanced Gas Turbines
,” GE Power Systems, Report No. GER-4207.
14.
Craig
,
K.
, and
Mann
,
M.
, 1996, “
Cost and Performance Analysis of Biomass-Based Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle (BIGCC) Power Systems
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Report No. TP-430-21657.
15.
Gas Turbine World 2006 Handbook
(
Pequot Publishing Inc.
,
Fairfield, CT
, 2006).
16.
Kinchin
,
C.
, and
Bain
,
R.
, 2009, “
Hydrogen Production from Biomass via Indirect Gasification: The Impact of NREL Process Development Unit Gasifier Correlations
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Report No. TP-510-44868.
17.
Watlow for 2.2 MW duct heaters, Watlow, 12001 Lackland Road, St. Louis MO, 63146, personal communication, 2009.
18.
Gassner
,
M.
, and
Marechal
,
F.
, 2008, “
Thermo-economic Optimization of the Integration of Electrolysis in Synthetic Natural Gas Production from Wood
,”
Energy
,
33
, pp.
189
198
.
19.
Srinivas
,
T.
,
Gupta
,
A. V. S.
, and
Reddy
,
B. V.
, 2009, “
Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model and Exergy Analysis of a Biomass Gasifier
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
131
, 031801, pp.
1
7
.
20.
Braun
,
R. J.
,
Hanzon
,
L. G.
, and
Dean
,
J. H.
, 2011, “
System Analysis of Thermochemical-based Biorefineries for Coproduction of Hydrogen and Electricity
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
133
, 012601, pp.
1
12
.
21.
Manning
,
F.
, and
Thompson
,
R.
, 1991,
Oilfield Processing of Petroleum Volume One: 904 Natural Gas
,
PennWell Publishing Co.
,
Tulsa, Oklahoma
.
22.
StatoilHydro, 2009, “
Hydrogen Technologies: World Leader in Electrolysis for Hydrogen Solutions
,” product brochure, Hydrogen Technologies, NO-3674 Notodden, Norway, COS 091408, available URL: http://908 www.electrolysers.comhttp://908 www.electrolysers.com.
23.
U.S. Department of Energy, Hydrogen Program, 2009, “
Future Central Hydrogen Production from Grid Electrolysis
,” H2A analysis, www.hydrogen.energy.gov/h2a_prod_studies.htmlwww.hydrogen.energy.gov/h2a_prod_studies.html.
24.
Phyllis Biomass Datapage, “
wood, hybrid poplar
,” ID # 806, available URL: http://www.ecn.nl/phyllishttp://www.ecn.nl/phyllis.
25.
Jin
,
H.
,
Larson
,
E.
, and
Celik
,
F.
, 2009, “
Performance and Cost Analysis of Future, Commercially Mature Gasification-Based Electric Power Generation From Switchgrass
,”
Biofpr
,
3
, pp.
142
173
.
26.
Department of Energy, 2007, “
Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants, Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity
,” Report No. DOE/NETL-2007/1281.
27.
U.S. Department of Energy, Hydrogen Program, 2009, “
DOE H2A Analysis
,” www.hydrogen.energy.gov/h2a_analysis.htmlwww.hydrogen.energy.gov/h2a_analysis.html.
28.
U.S. Department of Energy, Hydrogen Program, 2009, “
Future Central Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas with CO2 Sequestration
,” H2A analysis, www.hydrogen.energy.gov/h2a_prod_studies.htmlwww.hydrogen.energy.gov/h2a_prod_studies.html.
29.
Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Outlook 2009. www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/electricity.htmlwww.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/electricity.html.
30.
Schafer
,
A.
,
Heywood
,
J.
, and
Weiss
,
M.
, 2006, “
Future Fuel Cell and Internal Combustion Engine Automobile Technologies: A 25-Year Life Cycle and Fleet Impact Assessment
,”
Energy
,
31
, pp.
2064
2087
.
31.
32.
Doying
,
R.
, 2009, Midwest ISO, “
June Monthly Report
,” www.midwestiso.orgwww.midwestiso.org.
33.
PacifiCorp, 2009, “
Integrated Resource Plan – Volume 1
,” May 29, 2009. www.paci-937ficorp.comwww.paci-937ficorp.com.
34.
Frank Novachek, 2009, Xcel Energy, 414 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis MN, 55401 939, personal communication.
35.
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy, “
Biomass 2009 Multi-Year Research, Development and Demonstration Plan
,” www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/mypp_may2009.pdfwww1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/mypp_may2009.pdf.
36.
Sioshansi
,
R.
,
Denholm
,
P.
,
Jenkin
,
T.
, and
Weiss
,
J.
, 2009, “
Estimating the Value of Electricity Storage in PJM: Arbitrage and Some Welfare Effect
,”
Energy Econ.
,
31
, pp.
269
277
.
37.
Kroposki
,
B.
,
Levene
,
J.
,
Harrison
,
K.
,
Sen
,
P. K.
, and
Novachek
,
F.
, 2006, “
Electrolysis: Information and Opportunities for Electric Power Utilities
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Report No. TP-581-40.
You do not currently have access to this content.