Deconvolution allows the test analyst to estimate the constant-rate transient pressure response of a reservoir-well system, and assists us in system identification and parameter estimation. Unfortunately, deconvolution amplifies the noise contained in data. Often, we cannot identify the reservoir system from deconvolved results owing to solution instability caused by noise in measured data. We previously presented a deconvolution technique based on the fast Fourier transform that we applied to a single buildup or drawdown period. In this paper, we extend our previous work and apply the deconvolution technique based on the fast Fourier transform to arbitrarily changing rate profiles such as multirate tests. The deconvolution results, which represent a constant-rate pressure drawdown response spanning the entire duration of the test, can provide helpful insight into the correct reservoir description. We have improved our original deconvolution method in number of ways, particularly with the introduction of an iterative algorithm that produces stable deconvolution results. We demonstrate application of our deconvolution method to analysis of synthetic and field examples, including both flow and shut-in periods. Our deconvolution method can efficiently reproduce the characteristic responses of the reservoir-well system and increase our confidence in parameter estimates.

1.
Cheng
,
Y.
,
Lee
,
W. J.
, and
McVay
,
D. A.
, 2005, “
Fast-Fourier-Transform-Based Deconvolution for Interpretation of Pressure-Transient-Test Data Dominated by Wellbore Storage
,” SPEREE, 224.
2.
von Schroeter
,
T.
,
Hollaender
,
F.
, and
Gringarten
,
A.
, 2001, “
Deconvolution of Well Test Data as a Nonlinear Total Least Square Problem
,”
2001 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, New Orleans, LA, Sep. 3–Oct. 3, Paper No. SPE 71574.
3.
von Schroeter
,
T.
,
Hollaender
,
F.
, and
Gringarten
,
A.
, 2002, “
Analysis of Well Test Data From Permanent Downhole Gauges by Deconvolution
,”
2002 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, San Antonio, TX, Sept. 29–Oct. 2, Paper No. SPE-77688.
4.
Levitan
,
M. M.
, 2003, “
Practical Application of Pressure-Rate Deconvolution to Analysis of Real Well Tests
,”
2003 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Denver, CO, Oct. 5–8, Paper No. SPE 84290.
5.
Gringarten
,
A.
,
von Schroeter
,
T.
,
Rolfsvaag
,
T.
, and
Bruner
,
J.
, 2003, “
Use of Downhole Permanent Pressure Gauge Data to Diagnose Production Problems in a North Sea Horizontal Well
,”
2003 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Denver, CO, Oct. 5–8, Paper No. SPE 84470.
6.
Levitan
,
M. M.
,
Crawford
,
G. E.
, and
Hardwick
,
A.
, 2004, “
Practical Considerations for Pressure-Rate Deconvolution of Well Test Data
,”
2004 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Houston, TX, Sep. 26–29, Paper No. SPE 90680.
7.
Ramirez
,
R. W.
, 1985,
The FFT, Fundamentals and Concepts
,
Tektronix, Inc.
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
8.
Bracewell
,
R. N.
, 1986,
The Fourier Transform and Its Applications
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
9.
Richardson
,
W. H.
, 1972, “
Bayesian-Based Iterative Method of Image Restoration
,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am.
0030-3941,
62
, pp.
55
59
.
10.
Lucy
,
L. B.
, 1974, “
An Iterative Technique for the Rectification Observed Distributions
,”
Astron. J.
0004-6256,
79
, pp.
745
754
.
11.
Lee
,
W. J.
, and
Holditch
,
S. A.
, 1982, “
Application of Pseudotime to Buildup Test Analysis of Low Permeability Gas Wells With Long Duration Wellbore Storage Distortion
,”
JPT
0022-3522,
34
(
12
), pp.
2877
2887
.
12.
Pratikno
,
H.
,
Rushing
,
J. A.
, and
Blasingame
,
T. A.
, 2003, “
Decline Curve Analysis Using Type Curves—Fractured Wells
,”
2003 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Denver, CO, Oct. 5–8, Paper No. SPE 84290.
You do not currently have access to this content.