This study investigates theoretically and experimentally the slug damper as a novel flow conditioning device, which can be used upstream of compact separation systems. In the experimental part, a 3 in. ID slug damper facility has been installed in an existing 2 in. diameter two-phase flow loop. This flow loop includes an upstream slug generator, a gas-liquid cylindrical cyclone (GLCC©, ©The University of Tulsa, 1994) attached to the slug damper downstream and a set of conductance probes for measuring the propagation of the dissipated slug along the damper. Over 200 experimental runs were conducted with artificially generated inlet slugs of 50 ft length $(Ls/d=300)$ that were dumped into the loop upstream of the slug damper, varying the superficial liquid velocity between 0.5 ft/s and 2.5 ft/s and superficial gas velocity between 10 ft/s and 40 ft/s (in the 2 in. inlet pipe) and utilizing segmented orifice opening heights of 1 in., 1.5 in., 2 in., and 3 in. For each experimental run, the measured data included propagation of the liquid slug front in the damper, differential pressure across the segmented orifice, GLCC liquid level, GLCC outlet liquid flow, and static pressure in the GLCC. The data show that the slug damper/GLCC system is capable of dissipating long slugs, narrowing the range of liquid flow rate from the downstream GLCC. Also, the damper capacity to process large slugs is a strong function of the superficial gas velocity (and mixture velocity). The theoretical part includes the development of a mechanistic model for the prediction of the hydrodynamic flow behavior in the slug damper. The model enables the predictions of the outlet liquid flow rate and the available damping time, and in turn the prediction of the slug damper capacity. Comparison between the model predictions and the acquired data reveals an accuracy of $±30%$ with respect to the available damping time and outlet liquid flow rate. The developed model can be used for design of slug damper units.

1.
Sarica
,
C.
,
Shoham
,
O.
, and
Brill
,
J. P.
, 1990, “
A New Approach for Finger Storage Slug Catcher Design
,”
Offshore Technology Conference (OTC)
, Houston, Texas, May 7–10.
2.
Ramirez
,
R.
, 2000, “
Slug Dissipation in Helical Pipes
,” M.S. thesis, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK.
3.
Di Matteo
,
C. A.
, 2003, “
Mechanistic Modeling of Slug Dissipation in Helical Pipes
,” M.S. thesis, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK.
4.
Kouba
,
G.
, 2002, “
A Slug Damper for Compact Separators
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Engineering Technology Conference on Energy
, Houston, TX, Feb. 4–5, Paper No. ETCE 2002-PROD.
5.
Reinoso
,
A.
, 2002, “
Design and Performance of Slug Damper
,” M.S. thesis, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK.
6.
Gomez
,
L.
,
Shoham
,
O.
, and
Taitel
,
Y.
, 2000a, “
Prediction of Slug Liquid Holdup–Horizontal to Upward Vertical Flow
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
0301-9322,
26
(
3
), pp.
517
521
.
7.
Bendiksen
,
K. H.
, 1984, “
An Experimental Investigation of the Motion of Long Bubbles in Inclined Tubes
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
0301-9322,
10
, pp.
467
483
.
8.
Taitel
,
Y.
, and
Dukler
,
A. E.
, 1976, “
A Model for Predicting Flow Regime Transition in Horizontal and Near Horizontal Gas-Liquid Flow
,”
AIChE J.
0001-1541,
22
(
1
), p.
47
.
9.
Gomez
,
L. E.
,
Shoham
,
O.
,
Schimit
,
Z.
,
Chokshi
,
R. N.
,
Brown
,
A.
, and
Northug
,
T.
, 2000b, “
A Unified Mechanistic Model for Steady-State Two-Phase Flow in Wellbores and Pipelines
,”
SPE J.
,
5
(
3
), pp.
339
350
, SPE Paper No. 65705. 1086-055X
10.
Kouba
,
G. E.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Gomez
,
L. E.
,
Mohan
,
R. S.
, and
Shoham
,
O.
, 2006, “
Review of the State-of-the-Art Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone (GLCC©) Technology: Field Applications
,”
Proceedings of the 2006 SPE International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition
,
Beijing, China
, Dec. 5–7, SPE Paper No. 104256-PP.