Well testing is routinely performed to evaluate the performance of a well, which establishes the allocation factor for the lease, which in turn establishes tax and royalty basis. Most well testing is done with conventional gravity separators, which separates the produced stream into oil, water, and gas components and measures these individual components as individual streams. New multiphase measurement technology improves well test results through improved accuracy, consistency, and more frequent well testing. This paper examines the implication of these improved capabilities to recognize well problems and optimize production. A simple economic model is provided that an operator can use to assess the balance between the cost of performing periodic well tests and the benefits of more quickly discovering well problems that can result in less than expected production. The model relates the cost of decreased production, as the result of unforeseen changes in the well, to the frequency and accuracy of the well tests. The model derives an optimum test interval that minimizes the total cost of well testing and deferred production on the basis of the probability that a higher than normal decline in production rate can be detected by well testing. The model is then used in several field examples to assess the optimum period between well tests and how the optimum period can lead to reduced cost of operation and improved production.

1.
Neely, A. B., Bridges, G. L., and Ganus, P. G., 1980, “Improved Well Testing in Denver Unit,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, paper 9365.
2.
Marrelli, J. D., 2000, “Duri Area 10 Expansion-Optimal Matching of Separation and Metering Facilities for Performance, Cost, and Size,” Proceedings of ETCE 2000: Energy Sources Technology Conference & Exhibition, New Orleans, LA.
3.
Kouba
,
G. E.
,
1998
, “
A New Look at Measurement Uncertainty of Multiphase Flow Meters
,”
Trans. ASME
,
120
, (
March
), pp.
56
60
.
4.
Hakimian, N. H., Jumonville, J. M., and Scott, S. L., 2001, “Experimental Investigation of the Influence of Trace Amounts of Gas on Coriolis Liquid Metering,” Proceedings of ETCE 2001: Energy Sources Technology Conference & Exhibition, Houston, TX.
5.
Christianson, B. A., and Burger, E. L., 1991, “San Ardor Field Production Testing System Upgrade,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, paper 21533.
6.
Womack, J. T., 1973, “Uses of Short-Term Tests in Computer-Controlled Well Testing System,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, paper 4402.
7.
Means
,
S. R.
, and
Mehdizadeh
,
P.
,
2000
, “
New Technology Improves Well Testing Units
,” Oil & Gas Journal, Oct. 30, pp. 36–38.
8.
Shoham, O., and Mohan, R., 2001, “Integrated Compact Separation System for the Petroleum Industry of the New Millennium,” Proceedings of ETCE 2001: Energy Sources Technology Conference & Exhibition, Houston, TX.
9.
Shoham
,
O.
, and
Kouba
,
G. E.
,
1998
, “
The State-of-the-Art of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Compact Separation Technology
,” JPT, J. Pet. Technol., July, pp. 54–61.
10.
Mehdizadeh
,
P.
,
2001
, “
Multiphase Measuring Advances
,” Oil & Gas Journal, July 9, pp. 45–47.
11.
Falcone, G., Hewitt, G. F., Alimonti, C., and Harrison, B., 2001, “Multiphase Flow Metering: Current Trends and Future Developments,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, paper 71474.
12.
Christianson, B. A., 1997, “More Oil Form Better Information: New Technological Application for Testing Producing Wells,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, paper 37526.
13.
Muni
,
H. W.
, and
Dunn
,
K.
,
1966
, “
Industrial Engineering Evaluation of Petroleum Production Operations
,” J. Pet. Technol., February, pp. 177–180.
You do not currently have access to this content.