Flue gas injection into light oil reservoirs could be a cost-effective gas displacement method for enhanced oil recovery, especially in low porosity and low permeability reservoirs. The flue gas could be generated in situ as obtained from the spontaneous ignition of oil when air is injected into a high temperature reservoir, or injected directly into the reservoir from some surface source. When operating at high pressures commonly found in deep light oil reservoirs, the flue gas may become miscible or near–miscible with the reservoir oil, thereby displacing it more efficiently than an immiscible gas flood. Some successful high pressure air injection (HPAI) projects have been reported in low permeability and low porosity light oil reservoirs. Spontaneous oil ignition was reported in some of these projects, at least from laboratory experiments; however, the mechanism by which the generated flue gas displaces the oil has not been discussed in clear terms in the literature. An experimental investigation was carried out to study the mechanism by which flue gases displace light oil at a reservoir temperature of 116°C and typical reservoir pressures ranging from 27.63 MPa to 46.06 MPa. The results showed that the flue gases displaced the oil in a forward contacting process resembling a combined vaporizing and condensing multi-contact gas drive mechanism. The flue gases also became near-miscible with the oil at elevated pressures, an indication that high pressure flue gas (or air) injection is a cost-effective process for enhanced recovery of light oils, compared to rich gas or water injection, with the potential of sequestering carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas.

1.
Personal Communication, In Situ Combustion Research Group (ISCRG), Department of Chemical and Petroleum Eng., University of Calgary, Canada.
2.
Erickson, A., Legerski, J. R., Sr, and Steece, F. V., 1999, “An Appraisal of High Pressure Air Injection (HPAI) or In-Situ Combustion Results from Deep, High-Temperature, High-Gravity Oil Reservoirs,” Guidebook: 50th Anniversary Field Conference, Wyoming Geological Association, Casper, WY.
3.
Hardy, J. H., and Robertson, N., 1975, “Miscible Displacement by High Pressure Gas at Block 31,” Petroleum Engineer, pp. 24–28.
4.
Kumar
,
V. K.
,
Fassihi
,
M. R.
, and
Yannimaras
,
D. V.
,
1995
, “
Case History and Appraisal of the Medicine Pole Hills Unit Air-Injection Project
,”
SPERE
,
pp.
198
202
.
5.
Germain, P., and Geyelin, J. L., 1997, “Air Injection into a Light Oil Reservoir: The Horse Creek Project,” SPE 37782, Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain.
6.
Watts, B. C., Hall, T. F., and Petri, D. J., 1997, “The Horse Creek Air Injection Project: An Overview,” SPE 38359, Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, WY.
7.
Gillham, T. H., Cerveny, B. W., Fornea, M. A., and Bassiouni, Z., 1998, “LowCost IOR: An Update on the W. Hackberry Air Injection Project,” SPE 39642, SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK.
8.
Godwin, J., Lyons, T., Richardson, N., and Olsen, D., 1998, “A Small Independent Producer’s Design, Construction and Operation of a Flue Gas Injection Project, East Edna Field, Okmulgee County, Oklahoma,” SPE 39637, SPE/DOE 11th Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, OK.
9.
Stalkup
,
F. I.
, Jr.,
1983
, Miscible Displacement, Monograph Series, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, 8.
10.
Mohanty
,
K. K.
,
Gupta
,
A.
, and
Deruiter
,
R. A.
,
1994
, “
Pore-Level Mechanisms of Residual Oil Formation during Miscible Displacement
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
,
163
, pp.
199
216
.
11.
Zick, A. A., 1986, “A Combined Condensing/Vaporizing Mechanisms in the Displacement of Oil by Enriched Gases,” SPE 15493, 61st Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA.
12.
Shokoya
,
O. S.
,
Mehta
,
S. A.
,
Moore
,
R. G.
,
Maini
,
B. B.
,
Pooladi-Darvish
,
M.
, and
Chakma
,
A.
,
2002
, “
Evaluation of the Miscibility and Contribution of Flue Gas to Oil Recovery under High Pressure Air Injection
,”
J. Can. Pet. Technol.
,
41
(
10
), pp.
58
68
.
13.
Shokoya, O. S., 2001, “Miscibility Characteristics of Light Oil and In Situ Generated Flue Gases,” M.Sc. Thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
14.
Henry, R. L., and Metcalfe, R. S., 1980, “Multiple Phase Generation During CO2 Flooding,” SPE 8812, First Joint SPE/DOE Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, Tulsa, OK.
15.
Sayegh
,
S. G.
,
Wang
,
S. T.
, and
Fosti
,
J. E.
,
1988
, “
Recovery of Crude Oil by Nitrogen Injection-Laboratory Displacement Data
,”
J. Can. Pet. Technol.
,
27
(
6
), pp.
74
79
.
16.
Wu
,
R. S.
, and
Batycky
,
J. P.
,
1990
, “
Evaluation of Miscibility from Slim-Tube Tests
,”
J. Can. Pet. Technol.
,
pp.
63
70
.
17.
Stalkup, F. I., Jr., 1987, “Displacement Behavior of the Condensing/Vaporizing Gas Drive Process,” SPE 16715, 62nd Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX.
18.
Mansoori, J., and Gupta, S. P., 1988, “An Interpretation of the Displacement Behavior of Rich Gas Drives Using an Equation-of-State Compositional Model,” SPE 18061, 63rd Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX.
You do not currently have access to this content.