Continuous flow gas lift is one of the most common artificial lift methods widely used in the oil industry. A continuous volume of high-pressure gas is injected as deep as possible into the tubing, to gasify the oil column, and thus facilitate the production. If there is no restriction in the amount of injection gas available, sufficient gas can be injected into each oil well to reach maximum production. However, the injection gas available is generally insufficient. An inefficient gas allocation in a field with limited gas supply reduces the revenues, since excessive gas injection is expensive due to the high gas prices and compressing costs. Therefore, it is necessary to assign the injection gas into each well in optimal form to obtain the field maximum oil production rate. The gas allocation optimization can be considered as a maximization of a nonlinear function, which models the total oil production rate for a group of wells. The variables or unknowns for this function are the gas injection rates for each well, which are subject to physical restrictions. In this work a nonlinear optimization technique, based on an objective function with constraints, was implemented to find the optimal gas injection rates. A new mathematical fit to the gas-lift performance curve (GLPC) is presented and the numeric results of the optimization are given and compared with those of other methods published in the specialized literature. The GLPC can be either measured in the field, or alternatively generated by computer simulations, by mean of nodal analysis. The optimization technique proved fast convergence and broad application.

1.
Mayhill, T. D., 1974, “Simplified Method for Gas Lift Well Problem Identification and Diagnosis,” Paper SPE 5151, SPE 49th Annual Fall Meeting, Houston, TX.
2.
Kanu
,
E.
,
Mach
,
J. M.
, and
Brown
,
K. E.
,
1981
, “
Economic Approach to Oil Production and Gas Allocation in Continuous Gas Lift
,”
JPT, J. Pet. Technol.
,
33
, pp.
1887
1892
.
3.
Nishikiori
,
N.
,
Redner
,
R. A.
,
Doty
,
D. R.
, and
Schmidt
,
Z.
,
1995
, “
An Improved Method for Gas Lift Allocation Optimization
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
117
, pp.
87
92
.
4.
Buitrago, S., Rodrı´guez, E., and Espin, D., 1996, “Global Optimization Techniques in gas Allocation for Continuous Flow Gas Lift Systems,” SPE Paper 35616, Gas Technology Conference, Calgary, Canada.
5.
Radden, J. D., Sherman, T. A. G., and Blann, J. R., 1974, “Optimizing Gas Lift Systems,” Paper SPE 5150 SPE 49th Annual Fall Meeting, Houston, TX.
6.
Go´mez, V., 1974, “Optimization of Continuous Flow Gas Lift Systems,” M. S. thesis, University of Tulsa, OK.
7.
Hong, H. T., 1975, “Effect of Variables on Optimization of Continuous Gas Lift Systems,” M. S. thesis, University of Tulsa, OK.
8.
Nakamura, S., 1991, Applied Numerical Methods With Software, Prentice Hall, New York, NY.
9.
Nishikiori, N., 1989, “Gas Allocation Optimization for Continues Flow Gas Lift Systems,” M. S. thesis, University of Tulsa, OK.
10.
Polak, E., 1997, Optimization: Algorithms and Consistent Approximations, Springer Verlag, New York, NY.
11.
Schittowski
,
K.
,
1985
, “
NLQPL: A FORTRAN-Subroutine Solving Constrained Nonlinear Programming Problems
,”
Ann. Operat. Res.
,
5
, pp.
485
500
.
12.
Biggs, M. C., 1975, “Constrained Minimization Using Recursive Quadratic Programming, Towards Global Optimization,” Towards Global Optimization, L. C. W. Dixon and G. P. Szergo, eds., North-Holland, pp. 341–349.
13.
Powell, M. J. D., 1978, “A Fast Algorithm for Nonlinearly Constrained Optimization Calculations,” Numerical Analysis, G. A. Watson, ed., Lect. Notes Math., 630, Springer Verlag.
14.
The MathWorks Inc., 1990, Optimization Toolbox User’s Guide, Version 4.2, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick.
15.
Golan, M., and Whitson, C. H., 1991, Well Performance, Prentice Hall, 2nd Edition, Portland.
You do not currently have access to this content.