The concept of available energy, as defined by Gibbs is revisited. Being more general, this concept of available energy differs from that referred to commonly by the same name, or as “exergy” or “availability.” He gave representations of available energy for two circumstances. The first was the available energy of a “body,” for the case when a body, alone, is in a nonequilibrium condition and therefore has energy available. In turn, he presented the available energy of “the body and medium,” for the energy that is available because a body is not in equilibrium with some arbitrarily specified medium or “reference environment.” Gibbs’ did not present formulas to represent available energy. His representations were verbal descriptions regarding surfaces, curves and lines. Although his verbiage was augmented by some graphics, visualization of the geometrical entities he described depended largely on the imagination of the reader. In Part I, we take advantage of modern graphics software to illustrate more vividly not only the available energy he described verbally but also his interesting concepts of “available vacuum” and “capacity for entropy.” We argue that all of these concepts are equivalent. Since Gibbs, representations with formulas have been developed and are common for the “available energy of body and medium.” Gaggioli has developed formulas which are more general, to represent “the available energy of the body (alone)” and to assign an exergy to subsystems of the body as a measure of each subsystem’s contribution to the available energy. In contrast to the available energy, exergy is an additive property, so that balance equations can be written. This exergy is independent of any “reference environment,” which is important both theoretically and practically because of its relevance to proper selection of “the dead state.” In those special cases when the dead state is one in equilibrium with a “reference environment,” this more generalized exergy encompasses that concept called (today) exergy in textbooks and journals.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: GaggioliR@Marquette.edu
Article navigation
June 2002
Technical Papers
Available Energy—Part I: Gibbs Revisited
Richard A. Gaggioli,
e-mail: GaggioliR@Marquette.edu
Richard A. Gaggioli
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881
Search for other works by this author on:
David H. Richardson,
David H. Richardson
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881
Search for other works by this author on:
Anthony J. Bowman
Anthony J. Bowman
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard A. Gaggioli
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881
e-mail: GaggioliR@Marquette.edu
David H. Richardson
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881
Anthony J. Bowman
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881
Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received by the AES Division, May 10, 2000; revised manuscript received October 26, 2001. Associate Editor: A. M. Jacobi.
J. Energy Resour. Technol. Jun 2002, 124(2): 105-109 (5 pages)
Published Online: May 28, 2002
Article history
Received:
May 10, 2000
Revised:
October 26, 2001
Online:
May 28, 2002
Citation
Gaggioli, R. A., Richardson , D. H., and Bowman, A. J. (May 28, 2002). "Available Energy—Part I: Gibbs Revisited ." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. June 2002; 124(2): 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1448336
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Stage-wise kinetic analysis of ammonia addition effects on two-stage ignition in dimethyl ether
J. Energy Resour. Technol
Related Articles
A Brief on Biological Thermodynamics for Human Physiology
J Biomech Eng (July,2021)
Insight Into Recompression Brayton Cycle
ASME Open J. Engineering (January,2023)
Do We Really Need “Entransy”? A Critical Assessment of a New Quantity in Heat Transfer Analysis
J. Heat Transfer (April,2014)
“Entransy,” and Its Lack of Content in Physics
J. Heat Transfer (May,2014)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Siphon Seals and Water Legs
Hydraulics, Pipe Flow, Industrial HVAC & Utility Systems: Mister Mech Mentor, Vol. 1
Control and Operational Performance
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines: Operating Experience and Future Potential
Introduction and Definitions
Handbook on Stiffness & Damping in Mechanical Design