This paper discusses the comparison of three different methods for the optimization of an air-conditioning system from an exergonomic point of view. The reference design is an all air system in typical summer operation. To optimize the system on the basis of the exergonomic approach, it was necessary to the set up the physical model (based on mass, energy, and exergy balance equations) and the economic model in order to define the decision variables and the objective function. The latter is the total cost of the whole assembly, obtained by summing up the capital costs to the running costs. The Szargut-Tsatsaronis (S-T), the Montecarlo, and the Lagrange multipliers methods are then applied with the aim of minimizing the objective function. The results may be summarized as follows: the S-T method is an iterative procedure which allows the designer to control and guide the optimization process; however, the outcome may depend on the designer’s judgment and skill. The Monte Carlo method is an almost totally automated approach; it is based on stochastic techniques and may require relatively long run time. The Lagrange multipliers method, in addition to the optimum value for the decision variables, makes it possible to deduce the sensitivity coefficients, thus providing further information about system performance. For the case under consideration, the three methods provide comparable results in terms of decision variables and minimum global costs.

1.
Tsatsaronis, G., and Pisa, J., 1994, “Exergonomic Evaluation of Exergy Systems—Application to the CGAM Problem,” Energy, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 287–321.
2.
Valero, A., and Torres, C., 1990, “On Causality in Organized Energy Systems,” Proc. “A Future for Energy,” Flowers 90 Conference, S. Stecco and M. Moran, eds, Pergamon Press, pp. 397–420.
3.
Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G., and Moran, M., 1996, Thermal Design and Optimization, Wiley, New York, NY.
4.
Cammarata, G., Fichera, A., Forgia, F., and Marletta, L., 1994, “Exergetic Analysis of Basic Processes in Air Conditioning Systems,” Proc. Int Conf. on HVAC in Cold Climates, FINVAC 94. Finland Sept.
5.
Cammarata
,
G.
,
Fichera
,
A.
,
Mammino
,
L.
, and
Marletta
,
L.
, 1997, “Exergonomic Optimization of an Air Conditioning System,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., Mar.
6.
Frank, C., 1978, Introduction to System Sensitivity Theory, Academic Press, New York, NY.
7.
Szargut
,
J.
,
1971
,
Brennst.-Waerme-Kraft
,
23
, p.
513
513
.
8.
Stoecker, W. F., 1989, Design of Thermal Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
You do not currently have access to this content.