Erosion is a complex phenomenon that depends on many factors such as fluid properties, solid particle properties, flow stream velocity, flow geometry, and type of metal. Flow modeling and particle tracking are important tools for predicting erosion. In erosion modeling, it is important to account not only for the factors that influence erosion, but also for changes in some of these factors that occur as the erosion process continues. For example, the change in the geometry resulting can have a significant impact on the erosion results. Geometry changes result when corners, found in couplings and chokes, are eroded with time. This change in geometry due to erosion can drastically change the flow field, especially the turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation rate. Recognizing this change is imperative, since the prediction of particle behavior is heavily dependent on the turbulent kinetic energy. Furthermore, more particle impingements occur in regions with higher turbulent kinetic energy. This paper shows that neglecting the change in the flow field solution resulting from the change in geometry can cause erroneous erosion predictions. A computational study was performed on a choke geometry to demonstrate the importance of incorporating the change in geometry resulting from erosion. Predicted turbulent kinetic energy contours are presented as a function of the changing choke geometry. The predicted erosion rates along the choke are also examined for the various scenarios, and these results are compared to experimental results. Additionally, experimental results obtained from laser doppler velocimeter (LDV) measurements also demonstrate the change in fluctuating velocity (turbulent kinetic energy) as a result of rounding of the entrance of the choke. Results from this study show that it is necessary to update the flow geometry and flow model based on the changing geometry due to erosion. [S0195-0738(00)01004-9]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
pipe flow, corrosion, flow simulation, turbulence, geometry, laser Doppler anemometry, velocity
Topics:
Erosion, Flow (Dynamics), Geometry, Kinetic energy, Particulate matter, Turbulence, Fluids
1.
Shadley
,
J. R.
,
Shirazi
,
S. A.
,
Dayalan
,
E.
,
Ismail
,
M.
, and
Rybicki
,
E. F.
,
1996
, “
Erosion-Corrosion of a Carbon Steel Elbow in a CO2 Environment
,”
Corrosion (Houston)
,
52
, No.
9
, pp.
714
–
723
.
2.
Ali, J., 1997, “Sand Erosion Control by Using Chokes in Series in Deep, High Pressure Oil Producing Wells in North of Monagas, Venezuela,” Paper 38843 presented at the 1997 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, pp. 987–998.
3.
Edwards, J. K., McLaury, B. S., and Shirazi, S. A., 1998, “Supplementing a CFD Code with Erosion Prediction Capabilities,” ASME Paper FEDSM98-5229.
4.
Forder
,
A.
,
Thew
,
M.
, and
Harrison
,
D.
,
1998
, “
A Numerical Investigation of Solid Particle Erosion Experienced Within Oilfield Control Valves
,”
Wear
,
216
, pp.
184
–
193
.
5.
White, Frank M., 1991, Viscous Fluid Flow, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
6.
Crowe, C., Sommerfeld, M., and Tsuji, Y., 1998, Multiphase Flows With Droplets and Particles, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
7.
Clift, R., Grace, J. R., and Weber, M. E., 1978, Bubbles, Drops, and Particles, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
8.
Domgin, J. F., Huilier, D. G. F., Gardin, P., and Burnage, H., 1997, “Application of an Eulerian-Lagrangian Model to the Turbulent Dispersion of Particles in Turbulent Pipe Flows.” ASME Paper FEDSM97-3598.
9.
Patankar, S. V., 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere, New York, NY.
10.
Edwards, J. K., 1998, “A Generalized Erosion Prediction Procedure using Computational Fluid Dynamics With Application to Sudden Expansion Geometries,” M.S. thesis. The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK.
11.
Milojevic, D., Borner, T., and Durst, F., 1986, “Prediction of Turbulent Gas-Particle Flow Measurement in a Plain Confined Jet,” Proc., World Congress Particle Technology, Part IV, Partikel Technologi Numberg, Numbergy, pp. 485–505.
12.
Wong
,
K.
, and
Clark
,
H.
,
1993
, “
A Model of Particle Velocities and Trajectories in a Slurry Pot Erosion Tester
,”
Wear
,
160
, pp.
95
–
104
.
13.
McLaury, B. S., 1996, “Predicting Solid Particle Erosion Resulting from Turbulent Fluctuations in Oilfield Geometries,” Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK.
14.
Bitter
,
J. G. A.
,
1963
, “
A Study of Erosion Phenomena: Part II
,”
Wear
,
6
, pp.
169
–
190
.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.