Results from experiments conducted in downward liquid-gas flows in inclined, eccentric annular pipes, with water and air as the working fluids, are presented. The gas was injected in the middle of the test section length. The operating window, in terms of liquid and gas superficial velocities, within which countercurrent gas flow occurs at two low-dip angles, has been determined experimentally. The countercurrent flow observed was in the slug regime, while the co-current one was stratified. Countercurrent flow fraction and void fraction measurements were carried out at various liquid superficial velocities and gas injection rates and correlated to visual observations through a full-scale transparent test section. Our results indicate that countercurrent flow can be easily generated at small downward dip angles, within the practical range of liquid superficial velocity for drilling operations. Such flow is also favored by low gas injection rates.

1.
Aas, B., Bach, G., Hauge, H. C., and Stern, N., 1998, “Experimental Modeling of Gas Kicks in Horizontal Wells,” SPE/IADC 25709.
2.
Bourgoyne, Jr., A. T., 1997, “Well Control Considerations for Underbalanced Drilling,” SPE No. 38584, ’97 SPE ATCE, October 5–8, San Antonio, TX.
3.
Johnson, A. J., 1998, “An Investigation Into Stratified Co- and Counter-Current Two-Phase Flows,” SPE Production Engineering, Aug. pp. 393–399.
4.
Johnson, A. J., 1998, “Controlling Effects in Counter-current Two-Phase Flow,” SPE Production Engineering, Aug. pp. 400–404.
5.
Joseph, R. A., 19??, “Underbalanced Horizontal Drilling in an Abnormally-Pressured Environment,” No. PS.2DT10.001, Petrotech-95.
6.
Nessa, D. O. et al., 1997, “Offshore Underbalanced Drilling System Could Revive Field Developments,” World Oil, Part 1-July, Part 2-Oct.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.