The effects of friction and curvature on buckling, post-buckling, and unbuckling behavior of rods laterally constrained within an enclosure are studied experimentally. The experimental apparatus, measurement procedures, and uncertainty analysis are described. Results indicate that friction significantly delays the onset of buckling, and causes noticeable hysteresis in the post-buckling behavior. As a result, the unbuckling loads are always less than the corresponding buckling loads. The drag-related loss, which eventually leads to lock-up, is also measured and reported in this work. Friction is also a cause of post-buckling snapping and reversals in the direction of wrap of the helix. As expected, the effects of friction become less significant as the inclination decreases. It is shown that predictions of current theory agree with experimentally measured unbuckling rather than buckling loads. When friction is significant, current theory underestimates the compressive loads at which buckling occurs in straight or curved wellbores. Ignoring friction or curvature limits the estimated weight on bit well below the safe load that can be used in many drilling and completion operations in extended reach or horizontal wells. Moreover, the hysteresis effect of friction means that once buckling has occurred, the compressive loads must be reduced to values much below the buckling initiation loads to fully straighten the buckled pipe.

1.
ANSI/ASME Measurement Uncertainty Code, 1986, ANSI/ASME PTC 19.1–1985, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY.
2.
Cheatham, J. B., and Pattillo, P. D., 1984, “Helical Postbuckling Configuration of a Weightless Column Under the Action of an Axial Load,” SPE Journal, Aug., pp. 467–472.
3.
Chen, Y., Lin, Y., and Cheatham, J. B., 1990, “Tubing and Casing Buckling in Horizontal Wells,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, Feb., pp. 140–191.
4.
Dawson, R., and Paslay, P. R., 1984, “Drillpipe Buckling in Inclined Holes,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, Oct., pp. 1734–1738.
5.
He, X., and Kyllingstad, A., 1993, “Helical Buckling and Lock-up Conditions for Coiled Tubing in Curved Wells,” Paper No. SPE 25370, presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference, Feb.
6.
Langhaar, H. L., 1962, Energy Methods in Applied Mechanics, Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
7.
Lubinski, A., Althouse, W. S., and Logan, J. L., 1962, “Helical Buckling of Tubing Sealed in Packers,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, June, pp. 655–670.
8.
Mitchell, R. F., 1986, “Simple Frictional Analysis of Helical Buckling of Tubing,” SPE Drilling Engineering, Dec., pp. 303–310.
9.
Paslay
P. R.
, and
Bogy
D. B.
,
1964
, “
The Stability of a Circular Rod Laterally Constrained to be in Contact With an Inclined Circular Cylinder
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
31
, pp.
605
610
.
10.
Paslay, P. R., 1991, personal communication to the authors, Dallas, TX, Dec.
11.
Suryanarayana, P. V. R., and McCann, R. C., 1994, “Experimental Study of Buckling and Post-Buckling of Laterally Constrained Rods: Part 1—Frictional Effects,” Paper No. 94-PET-1, presented at the ASME Energy-Sources Technology Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, January 23–27.
12.
Timoshenko, S. P., 1956, Strength of Materials, Part II, D. Van Nostrand and Co., Princeton, NJ, pp. 151–152.
13.
Timoshenko, S. P., and Gere, J. M., 1961, Theory of Elastic Stability, McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
14.
Wu, J., and Juvkam-Wold, H. C., 1990, “Discussion of Tubing and Casing Buckling in Horizontal Wells,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, Aug., pp. 1062–1063.
15.
Wu, J., and Juvkam-Wold, H. C., 1993, “Study of Helical Buckling of Pipes in Horizontal Wells,” Paper No. SPE 25503, Proceedings of the Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, OK, March 21–23, pp. 867–876.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.