In the current study, a network-based resistor model has been developed for thermal analysis of a complex opto-electronic package called small form-factor pluggable device (SFP). This is done using the DEvelopment of Libraries of PHysical models for an Integrated design (DELPHI) methodology. The SFP is an optical transceiver widely used in telecommunication equipments such as switches and routers. The package has a detailed construction and typically has four fixed heat generating sources. The detailed model for the SFP is constructed and calibrated using a natural convection experiment. The calibrated detailed model is used for generating the limited boundary-condition-independent compact thermal model (CTM). Limited boundary-condition-independence, in this case, refers only to a small subset of all “thinkable” boundary conditions that are experienced by the SFP device in practical situations. The commercial optimization tool developed by the DELPHI team, DOTCOMP, is used for generating the compact thermal model. A detailed validation of the CTM of the SFP in real-time applications using FLOTHERM 7.2, a computational fluid dynamics-based thermal analysis software package, is performed. The results show excellent agreement between the results predicted by the SFP CTM with the data from the detailed model. The SFP CTM predicts the junction temperature of the four power-dissipating components and the heat flows through the sides with relative error less than 10%.

1.
Small Form-factor Pluggable (SFP) Transceiver Multi-Source Agreement (MSA), “
Cooperation Agreement for Small Form-Factor Pluggable Transceivers
,” Sept. 14, 2000.
2.
Lasance
,
C.
,
Vinke
,
H.
,
Rosten
,
H.
, and
Weiner
,
K. L.
, 1995, “
A Novel Approach for the Thermal Characterization of Electronic Parts
,”
Proceedings of SEMITHERM XI
, San Jose, CA, pp.
1
9
.
3.
Rosten
,
H. I.
,
Lasance
,
C. J. M.
, and
Parry
,
J. D.
, 1997, “
The World of Thermal Characterization According to DELPHI—Part I: Background to DELPHI
,”
IEEE Trans. Compon., Packag. Manuf. Technol.
,
20
(
4
), pp.
384
391
.
4.
Rosten
,
H. I.
,
Lasance
,
C. J. M.
, and
Parry
,
J. D.
, 1997, “
The World of Thermal Characterization According to DELPHI—Part II: Experimental and Numerical Methods
,”
IEEE Trans. Compon., Packag. Manuf. Technol.
,
20
(
4
), pp.
392
398
.
5.
Lasance
,
C. J. M.
, 2003, “
Special Section on Compact Thermal Modeling
,”
IEEE Trans. Compon., Packag. Manuf. Technol.
,
26
(
1
), pp.
134
135
.
6.
Lasance
,
C. J. M.
, 2003, “
Recent Progress in Thermal Compact Modelling
,”
Proceedings of SEMITHERM XIX
, San Jose, CA, pp.
290
299
.
7.
Lasance
,
C. J. M.
and
Szekely
,
V.
, 2005, “
Foreword, THERMINIC Special Section
,”
IEEE Trans. Compon., Packag. Manuf. Technol.
,
28
(
4
), pp.
591
592
.
8.
Lasance
,
C. J. M.
, 2008, “
Ten Years of Boundary-Condition-Independent Compact Thermal Modeling of Electronic Parts: A Review
,”
Heat Transfer Eng.
0145-7632,
29
(
2
), pp.
149
168
.
9.
Assouad
,
Y.
,
Gatfosse
,
F.
, and
Gautier
,
T.
, 1995, “
Transient Characterization and Modeling of Ceramic Packages
,”
Proceedings of the Second THERMINIC International Workshop Thermal Investigations IC’s Microstructures
, Budapest.
10.
Sabry
,
M. N.
, 2007, “
Flexible Profile Compact Thermal Models for Practical Geometries
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
129
, pp.
256
259
.
11.
Bosch
,
E. G. T.
, 2001, “
Thermal Compact Models: An Alternative Approach
,”
Proceedings of THERMINIC 7
, Paris, France, Sept. 25–28, pp.
191
196
.
12.
Bosch
,
E.
, and
Sabry
,
M. N.
, 2002, “
Thermal Compact Models for Electronic Systems
,”
Proceedings of SEMITHERM XVIII
, pp.
21
29
.
13.
Sabry
,
M. N.
, 2003, “
Dynamic Compact Thermal Models Used for Electronic Design: A Review of Recent Progress
,”
Proceedings of IPACK03, International Electronic Packaging Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Maui, HI, Interpack 2003-35185.
14.
Sabry
,
M. N.
, 2005, “
High-Precision Compact-Thermal Models
,”
IEEE Trans. Compon., Packag. Manuf. Technol.
,
28
(
4
), pp.
623
629
.
15.
Murphy
,
S.
, and
Yi
,
R.
, 2002, “
Thermal Analysis Design and Validation of an SFP Transceiver CFD Model
,” White Paper HFBR-5710L, ONIDS.
16.
Application Note 1237, 2006, “
Agilent Evaluation Board for Small Form-Factor Pluggable (SFP) Transceivers
.”
19.
Aranyosi
,
A.
,
Ortega
,
A.
,
Griffin
,
R.
,
West
,
S.
, and
Edwards
,
D.
, 2000, “
Compact Thermal Models of Packages Used in Conduction Cooled Applications
,”
IEEE Trans. Compon., Packag. Manuf. Technol.
,
23
, p.
470
.
20.
22.
Lasance
,
C. J. M.
, 2000, “
Two Benchmarks for the Study of Compact Thermal Modeling Phenomena
,”
Proceedings of THERMINIC 6
, Budapest, Hungary, Sept. 24–27, pp.
235
243
.
23.
Aranyosi
,
A.
,
Ortega
,
A.
,
Evans
,
J.
,
Tarter
,
T.
,
Pursel
,
J.
, and
Radhakrishnan
,
J.
, 2000, “
Development of Compact Thermal Models for Advanced Electronic Packaging: Methodology and Experimental Validation for a Single-Chip CPGA Package
,”
IEEE Inter Society Conference on Thermal Phenomena
.
24.
Taguchi
,
G.
, and
Yokoyama
,
Y.
, 1994,
Taguchi Methods: Design of Experiments
,
American Supplier Institute
,
Dearborn, MI
.
25.
Lasance
,
C. J. M.
,
Hertog
,
D. D.
, and
Stehouwer
,
P.
, 1999, “
Creation and Evaluation of Compact Models for Thermal Characterization using Dedicated Optimization Software
,”
Proceedings of SEMITHERM XV
, San Diego, CA, pp.
189
200
.
You do not currently have access to this content.