The performance of an array of staggered and nonstaggered cooling fins is compared, looking not only into the traditional objective of maximum heat transfer flux, but also to obtain it with the minimum flow resistance. Three different models were studied to obtain the ratio between the heat removed and the energy spent for the coolant flow going through the cooling fins. The study is done numerically using the computational fluid dynamic software FLUENT. The results show the advantages of the staggered model compared to the standard model since for a given incoming velocity, the use of a staggered heat sink always leads to a maximization of the heat transfer flux. The significant positive difference in the thermal performance of the staggered model permits the reduction of the incoming velocity with the consequent reduction in the pressure drop, and power consumption. The authors consider this research as a quite interesting approach as compared to other research where the flow resistance has not been taken into account.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
cooling, thermal management (packaging), modelling, thermal analysis, computational fluid dynamics
Topics:
Cooling, Fins, Flow (Dynamics), Pressure drop, Heat, Heat transfer, Heat sinks, Coolants, Forced convection
1.
Incropera
,
F. P.
,
1988
, “
Convection Heat Transfer in Electronic Equipment Cooling
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
110
, Nov., pp.
1097
–
1111
.
2.
Kin, S. J., and Lee, S. W., 1996, Air Cooling Technology for Electronic Equipment, CRC Press, New York, pp. 2–46.
3.
Azar
,
K.
, 2000, “The History of the Power Dissipation,” J. Electronics Cooling, 6(2), pp. 42–50.
4.
Maling
,
G. C.
, and
Yeager
,
D. M.
, 1996, “Minimizing Acoustical Noise in Electronic Systems,” J. Electronics Cooling, 2(2), pp. 14–17.
5.
Soodphakdee, D., et al., 1998, “A Comparison of Heat Sink Geometries for Laminar Forced Convection: Numerical Simulation of Periodically Developed Flow,” The Sixth Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, Seattle, Washington, pp. 310–315.
6.
Wirtz
,
R. A.
, and
Colban
,
D. M.
,
1996
, “
Comparison of the Cooling Fin Performance of Staggered and In-Line Arrays of Electronic Packages
,”
ASME J. Electron. Packag.
,
118
, pp.
27
–
30
.
7.
Zhang
,
L. W.
, et al.,
1997
, “
Heat Transfer Enhancement Mechanisms in Inline and Staggered Parallel-Plate Fin Heat Exchanger
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
40
, pp.
2307
–
2325
.
8.
Biber
,
C. R.
, 1996, “Applying Computational Fluid Dynamics to Heat Sink Design and Selection,” J. Electronics Cooling, 2(1), pp. 22–25.
9.
Holman, J. P., 1998, Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 150–219.
10.
Incropera, F. P., and De Witt, D. P., 1985, Introduction to Heat Transfer, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 243–369.
11.
Mereu
,
S.
,
Sciubba
,
E.
, and
Bejan
,
A.
,
1993
, “
The Optimal Cooling of a Stack of Heat Generating Boards with Fixed Pressure Drop, Flow Rate or Pumping Power
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
36
, pp.
3677
–
3686
.
12.
Fluent Incorporated, 1996, Software Manual, pp. 8-1–8-50.
13.
Rohsenow, W. M., 1985, Handbook of Heat Transfer Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 6-1–6-41.
14.
Leo´n
,
O.
,
De Mey
,
G.
, and
Dick
,
E.
,
2002
, “
Study of the Optimal Layout of Cooling Fins in Forced Convection Cooling
,”
Microelectron. Reliab.
,
42
, pp.
1101
–
1111
.
Copyright © 2003
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.