The goals of the present paper are to apply the recently developed decomposed analysis procedure using a computer code developed in this study. The decomposed technique enables one to determine the equilibrium configuration of electronic packages with significant computational efficiency at a reasonable accuracy. Further, it allows the independent analysis of the subsystems enabling “reusable” modules in a manner analogous to the object-oriented programming paradigm of modern computer languages. The code described here uses a nonlinear optimization procedure that ensures the approximate satisfaction of the balance of mechanical energy. The developed procedure is demonstrated on a variety of two- and three-dimensional hypothetical and “real-world” electronic packages. It is shown that with the use of the decomposed solution methodology, for a 225 I/O PBGA package, a speedup of nearly seven times is achieved at an accuracy loss in displacements of approximately 5.5 percent. It is also shown that the calculated peak shear displacements agree very well with experimental measurements made using laser moire´ interferometry. Since the analysis procedure is independent of the number of solder interconnects, significantly larger time savings are expected for larger packages.

1.
SIA, Semiconductor Industry Association, 1997, “The National Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors.”
2.
Deshpande
,
A.
, and
Subbarayan
,
G.
,
2000
, “
Decomposition techniques for the efficient analysis of area array packages.
ASME J. Electron. Packag.
,
122
, No.
1
, pp.
13
19
.
3.
Farhat
,
C.
, and
Wilson
,
E.
,
1987
, “
A New Finite Element Concurrent Computer Program Architecture
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
24
, pp.
1771
1792
.
4.
Farhat
,
C.
, and
Crivelli
,
L.
,
1989
, “
A general approach to nonlinear FE computations on shared-memory multiprocessors
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
72
, No.
2
, pp.
153
171
.
5.
Haftka, R. T., and Gurdal, Z., 1992, “Elements of Structural Optimization,” Kluwer Academic Publications, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
6.
Zienkiewicz, O. C., and Taylor, R. L., 1989 The Finite Element Method. Volume 1, McGraw-Hill, London.
7.
Deshpande
,
A.
,
Subbarayan
,
G.
, and
Rose
,
D.
,
2000
, “
A System for First Order Reliability Estimation Of Solder Joints In Area Array Packages
,”
ASME J. Electron. Packag.
,
122
, No.
1
, pp.
6
12
.
8.
Zhang, L., Hunter, B., Subbarayan, G., and Rose, D., 1999, “The Accuracy of Structural Approximations Employed in Analysis of Area Array Packages,” IEEE Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, Part A, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 525–533.
9.
Montgomery, Douglas C., 1997, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
10.
Subbarayan
,
G.
,
1996
, “
A Procedure for Automated Shape and Life Prediction in Flip-Chip and BGA Solder Joints
,”
ASME J. Electron. Packag.
,
118
, pp.
127
133
.
11.
Schittkowski
,
K.
,
1985
/1986, “
NLPQL: A Fortran subroutine solving constrained nonlinear programming problems
,”
Ann. Oper. Res.
,
5
, pp.
485
500
.
12.
ABAQUS User’s Manual, 1997, Version 5.7, Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc., Pawtucket, RI.
13.
Digital Computations, Inc., 1997, User’s Guide, DOE—KISS, Colorado Springs, CO, Air Academy Press and Associates, LLC.
You do not currently have access to this content.