An approximate mathematical model is developed for predicting the shapes of solder joints in an array-type interconnect (e.g., a ball-grid array or flip-chip interconnect). The model is based on the assumption that the geometry of each joint may be represented by a surface of revolution whose generating meridian is a circular arc. This leads to simple, closed-form expressions relating stand-off height, solder volume, contact pad radii, molten joint reaction force (exerted on the component), meridian curvature, and solder surface tension. The qualitative joint shapes predicted by the model include concave (hourglass-shaped), convex (barrel-shaped, with a truncated sphere as a special case), and truncated-cone geometries. Theoretical results include formulas for determining the maximum and minimum solder volumes that can be supported by a particular pair of contact pads. The model is used to create dimensionless plots which summarize the general solution in the case of a uniform array (i.e., one comprising geometrically identical joints) for which the contact pads on the component and substrate are of the same size. These results relate the values of joint height and width (after reflow) to the solder joint volume and the molten-joint force for arbitrary values of the pad radius and solder surface tension. The graphs may be applied to both upright and inverted reflow, and can be used to control stand-off for higher reliability or to reduce bridging and necking problems causing low yields. A major advantage of the model is that it is numerically efficient (involving only simple, closed-form expressions), yet generates results that are in excellent agreement with experimental data and more complex models. Thus, the model is ideally suited to performing parametric studies, the results of which may be cast in a convenient form for use by practicing engineers. Although in the present paper the array is assumed to be doubly-symmetric, i.e., possess two orthogonal planes of symmetry, the model may be extended to analyze arrays of arbitrary layout. The motivation for predicting joint geometries in array-type interconnects is two-fold: (1) to achieve optimal joint geometries from the standpoint of improved yield and better reliability under thermal cycling and (2) to take full advantage of the flexibility of new methods of dispensing solder, such as solder-jet and solder-injection technologies, which enable the volume of each individual joint to be controlled in a precise manner. Use of dispensing methods of these types permits the solder volumes in the array to be distributed in a non-uniform manner. Results such as those presented here (in combination with appropriate fatigue studies) can be used to determine the optimal arrangement of solder volumes.

1.
Brakke, K. A., 1994, Surface Evolver Manual, version 1.94j, The Geometry Center, 1300 S. Second St., Minneapolis, MN 55454.
2.
Choi
K.-J.
, and
Delcorio
B.
,
1990
, “
Generation of Controllable Monodispersed Sprays Using Impulse Jet and Charging Techniques
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
, Vol.
61
, No.
6
, June, pp.
1689
1693
.
3.
Goldmann
L. S.
,
1969
, “
Geometric Optimization of Controlled Collapse Interconnections
,”
IBM J. Res. Develop.
, Vol.
13
, May, pp.
251
265
.
4.
Hayes, D. J., Wallace, D. B., Boldman, M. T., and Marusak, R. E., 1992, “Picoliter Solder Droplet Dispensing,” ISHM ’92, pp. 173–180.
5.
Heinrich
S. M.
,
Elkouh
A. F.
,
Nigro
N. J.
, and
Lee
P. S.
,
1990
, “
Solder Joint Formation in Surface Mount Technology—Part I: Analysis
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
112
, No.
3
, pp.
210
218
.
6.
Heinrich, S. M., 1994, “Prediction of Solder Joint Geometry,” Ch. 5 of The Mechanics of Solder Alloy Interconnects, Frear, Morgan, Burchett, and Lau, eds., Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 158–198.
7.
Heinrich, S. M., Schroeder, S. A., and Lee, P. S., 1995, “Selection of Design and Process Parameters for Non-Uniform Ball-Grid Arrays,” Advances in Electronic Packaging: Toward Failure-Free, Low-Cost Packaging, Vol. 1, ASME-EEP Vol. 10-1, pp. 273–288; presented at Inter Pack ’95, Lahaina, HI, March.
8.
Heinrich
S. M.
,
Shakya
S.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Lee
P. S.
, and
Schroeder
S. A.
,
1996
, “
Improved Yield and Performance of Ball-Grid Array Packages: Design and Processing Guidelines for Uniform and Non-Uniform Arrays
,”
IEEE Trans.: Components, Packaging & Manufacturing Technology, Series B
, Vol.
19
, No.
2
, May, pp.
310
319
.
9.
Ju, T.-H., Lin, W., Lee, Y. C., and Liu, J. J., 1993, “Effects of Ceramic Ball-Grid-Array Packages Manufacturing Variations on Solder Joint Reliability,” Paper No. 93-WA/EEP-2, ASME Winter Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, November 28-December 3.
10.
Katyl
R. H.
, and
Pimbley
W. T.
,
1992
, “
Shape and Force Relationships for Molten Axisymmetric Solder Connections
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
114
, No.
3
, Sept., pp.
336
341
.
11.
Klein Wassink, R. J., 1989, Soldering in Electronics, 2nd ed., Electrochemical Publications Limited.
12.
Landry, M., Patra, S. K., and Lee, Y. C., 1991, “Experiment and Modeling of the Self-Alignment Mechanism in Flip-Chip Soldering,” Manufacturing Processes and Materials Challenges in Microelectronic Packaging, ASME AMD-Vol. 131/EEP-Vol. 1, pp. 49–56.
13.
Lin, W., 1994, personal communication, NIST Workshop on Solder Joint Design, NSF Geometry Center, Minneapolis, MN, May 31–June 2.
14.
Nigro, N. J., 1994, personal communication.
15.
Nigro
N. J.
,
Heinrich
S. M.
,
Elkouh
A. F.
,
Zou
X.
,
Fournelle
R. A.
, and
Lee
P. S.
,
1993
, “
Finite Element Method for Predicting Equilibrium Shapes of Solder Joints
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
115
, No.
2
, June, pp.
141
146
.
16.
Ohshima, M., Kenmotsu, A., and Ishi, I., 1982, “Optimization of Micro-Solder Reflow Bonding for the LSI Flip Chip,” Proc. 2nd Annual Intl. Electronics Packaging Soc. Conf., pp. 481–488.
17.
Ohshima, M., Satoh, R., Hirota, K., and Ishi, I., 1985, “New Micro-Soldering Technology and its Application to VLSI,” Proc. 1st IEEE CHMT Symposium: CHMT Tokyo ’84, published in Aug., pp. 165–170.
18.
Patra
S. K.
, and
Lee
Y. C.
,
1991
, “
Quasi-Static Modeling of Self-Alignment Mechanism in Flip-Chip Soldering. Part I: Single Solder Joint
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
113
, No.
4
, Dec. pp.
337
342
.
19.
Patra, S. K., Sritharan, S. S., and Lee, Y. C., 1992, “Minimum-Energy Surface Profile of Solder Joints for Non-Circular Pads,” Proc. ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA.
20.
Satoh, R., Ohshima, M., Komura, H., Ishi, I., and Serizawa, K., 1983, “Development of a New Micro-Solder Bonding Method for VLSIs,” Proc. 3rd Annual Intl. Electronics Packaging Soc. Conf, pp. 455–461.
21.
Satoh
R.
,
Ohshima
M.
,
Hirota
K.
, and
Ishi
I.
,
1987
, “
Optimum Bonding Shape Control of Micro-Solder Joint of IC and LSI
,”
J. Japan Inst. Metals
, Vol.
51
, No.
6
, pp.
553
560
.
22.
Shanks, M. E., and Gambill, R., 1973, Calculus, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., p. 681.
23.
Singler, T. J., Pitarresi, J. M., Holub, I. R., and Yin, H., “Towards an Optimization Algorithm for Solder Joint Reliability,” 1995, Advances in Electronic Packaging 1995, Vol. 2, ASME EEP-Vol. 10-2, pp. 1155–1166; presented at Inter Pack ’95, Lahaina, HI.
24.
Singler
T. J.
,
Zhang
X.
, and
Brakke
K. A.
,
1996
, “
Computer Simulation of Solder Bridging Phenomena
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
118
, No.
3
, Sept., pp.
122
126
25.
Tsukada, Y., Mashimoto, Y., Nishimura, H., and Mii, N., 1993, “High Density Carrier Bump Build by Molten Solder Injection,” Advances in Electronic Packaging 1993, Vol. 1, ASME EEP-Vol. 4-1, pp. 353–359.
26.
Wallace
D. B.
,
1989
, “
Automated Electronic Circuit Manufacturing Using Ink-Jet Technology
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
111
, No.
2
, June, pp.
108
111
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.