As fuel cells continue to improve in performance and power densities levels rise, potential applications ensue. System-level performance modeling tools are needed to further the investigation of future applications. One such application is small-scale aircraft propulsion. Both piloted and unmanned fuel cell aircrafts have been successfully demonstrated suggesting the near-term viability of revolutionizing small-scale aviation. Nearly all of the flight demonstrations and modeling efforts are conducted with low temperature fuel cells; however, the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) should not be overlooked. Attributing to their durability and popularity in stationary applications, which require continuous operation, SOFCs are attractive options for long endurance flights. This study presents the optimization of an integrated solid oxide fuel cell-fuel processing system model for performance evaluation in aircraft propulsion. System parameters corresponding to maximum steady state thermal efficiencies for various flight phase power levels were obtained through implementation of the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Optimal values for fuel utilization, air stoichiometric ratio, air bypass ratio, and burner ratio, a four-dimensional optimization problem, were obtained while constraining the SOFC operating temperature to 650–1000 °C. The PSO swarm size was set to 35 particles, and the number of iterations performed for each case flight power level was set at 40. Results indicate the maximum thermal efficiency of the integrated fuel cell-fuel processing system remains in the range of 44–46% throughout descend, loitering, and cruise conditions. This paper discusses a system-level model of an integrated fuel cell-fuel processing system, and presents a methodology for system optimization through the particle swarm algorithm.

References

References
1.
Poshusta
,
J.
,
Li
,
Z.
,
Mahoney
,
J.
, and
Kodzwa
,
P.
, 2008, “
Fuel Processing for Portable SOFC Systems
,”
Fuel Cell Seminar and Exposition
, Phoenix, AZ, FCSE Paper No. 2008–1852.
2.
Brett
,
D. J. L.
,
Aguiar
,
P.
, and
Brandon
,
N. P.
, 2006, “
System Modeling and Integration of an Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and ZEBRA Battery for Automotive Applications
,”
J. Power Sources
,
163
, pp.
514
522
.
3.
Larminie
,
J.
,
Dicks
,
A.
, 2003,
Fuel Cell Systems Explained
,
2nd ed.
,
John Wiley and Sons
,
West Sussex
.
4.
Pukrushpan
,
J. T.
, 2003, “
Modeling and Control of Fuel Cell Systems and Fuel Processors
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
5.
Tsourapas
,
V.
, 2007, “
Control Analysis of Integrated Fuel Cell Systems With Energy Recuperation Devices
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
6.
Yi
,
Y.
,
Rao
,
A. D.
,
Brouwer
,
J.
, and
Samuelsen
,
G. S.
, 2005, “
Fuel Flexibility Study of an Integrated 25 kW SOFC Reformer System
,”
J. Power Sources
,
144
, pp.
67
76
.
7.
Cengel
,
Y.
, and
Turner
,
R.
, 2005,
Fundamentals of Thermal-Fluid Sciences
,
2nd ed.
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
8.
Zhu
,
J.
,
Zhang
,
D.
, and
King
,
K. D.
, 2001, “
Reforming of CH4 by Partial Oxidation: Thermodynamic and Kinetic Analyses
,”
Fuel
,
80
, pp.
899
905
.
9.
Holtappels
,
P.
,
Mehling
,
H.
,
Roehlich
,
S.
,
Liebermann
,
S. S.
, and
Stimming
,
U.
, 2005, “
SOFC System Operating Strategies for Mobile Applications
,”
Fuel Cells
,
5(4)
, pp.
499
508
.
10.
Microtherm
,” 2001, www.microtherm.uk.com.
11.
Petersen
,
T. F.
,
Houbak
,
N.
, and
Elmegaard
,
B.
, 2006, “
A Zero-Dimensional Model of a 2nd Generation Planar SOFC Using Calibrated Parameters
,”
Int. J. Thermodyn.
,
9
(
4
), pp.
147
159
.
12.
Chick
,
L. A.
,
Stevenson
,
J. W.
,
Williford
,
R. E.
, and
Simner
,
S. P.
, 2003, “
PNNL SOFC Excel Spreadsheet Model
,” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Report No. PNNL-SA-36950.
13.
Eberhart
,
R. C.
, and
Kennedy
,
J.
, 1995, “
A New Optimizer Using Particle Swarm Theory
,”
Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science
, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, pp.
39
43
.
14.
Reynolds
,
C. W.
, 1987, “
Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model
,”
ACM Comput. Graph.
,
21
(
4
), pp.
25
34
.
15.
Shi
,
Y.
, 2004, “
Particle Swarm Optimization
,”
IEEE Connect, Newsletter IEEE Neural Networks Soc.
,
2
(
1
), pp.
8
13
.
16.
Zamfirescu
,
C.
, and
Dincer
,
I.
, 2009, “
Thermodynamic Performance Analysis and Optimization of a SOFC-H+ System
,”
Thermochim. Acta
,
486
, pp.
32
40
.
17.
Vargas
,
J. V. C.
,
Ordonez
,
J. C.
, and
Bejan
,
A.
, 2004, “
Constructal Flow Structure for a PEM Fuel Cell
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
47
, pp.
4177
4193
.
18.
Vargas
,
J. V. C.
,
Ordonez
,
J. C.
, and
Bejan
,
A.
, 2004, “
Constructal PEM Fuel Cell Stack Design
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
48
, pp.
4410
4427
.
19.
Mawardi
,
A.
,
Yang
,
F.
, and
Pitchumani
,
R.
, 2005, “
Optimization of the Operating Parameters of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell for Maximum Power Density
,”
J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol.
,
2
, pp.
121
135
.
20.
Parsopoulos
,
K. E.
, and
Vrahatis
,
M. N.
, 2002, “
Particle Swarm Optimization Method in Multiobjective Problems
,”
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
, pp.
603
607
.
You do not currently have access to this content.