The thermal, electrical, and fluid flow fields associated with a Siemens Power Generation Inc., Stationary Fuel Cells, flattened tubular high power density (HPD) solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) were investigated comprehensively in a previous study. The present computational investigation is the subsequent part of an ongoing numerical pursuit at Siemens of an optimized cell geometry, commercialization of SOFC technology being the ultimate objective. A Delta type HPD cell featuring eight air channels was investigated and compared with a flattened tubular HPD cell. The computational models were developed using the commercial computational fluid dynamics software FLUENT 6.2 along with its SOFC user defined routine to model the electrochemical effects. The SOFC model parameters were derived from experimental data. The cathode, the anode, and the interconnection layers of the cell were resolved in the model and all modes of heat transfer, conduction, convection, and radiation were included. The resulting electrical performance and the thermal hydraulic characteristics of the cells for fully reformed natural gas fuel flow (reformed external to the cell) are presented and discussed. It was clear from these studies that the Delta HPD cell has distinct advantages over the flattened HPD cell in terms of system electrical performance as well as power density.

1.
George
,
R. A.
, 2000, “
Status of Tubular SOFC Field Unit Demonstrations
,”
J. Power Sources
0378-7753,
86
, pp.
134
139
.
2.
Veyo
,
S. E.
,
Shockling
,
L. A.
,
Dederer
,
J. E.
,
Gillett
,
J. E.
, and
Lundberg
,
W. L.
, 2002, “
Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell/Gas Turbine Hybrid Cycle Power Systems: Status
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
124
, pp.
845
849
.
3.
Rogers
,
W. A.
,
Gemmen
,
R. S.
,
Johnson
,
C.
,
Prinkey
,
M. T.
, and
Shahnam
,
M.
, 2003, “
Validation and Application of a CFD-Based Model for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells and Stacks
,”
Proceedings of The First International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology
, Rochester, NY, Apr. 21–23.
4.
Prinkey
,
M. T.
,
Shahnam
,
M. S.
, and
Rogers
,
W. A.
, 2003, “
SOFC FLUENT Model Theory Guide and User Manual
,” FLUENT UDF Manual.
5.
Iyengar
,
A. K. S.
,
DiGiuseppe
,
G.
,
Desai
,
N. A.
,
Vora
,
S. D.
, and
Shockling
,
L. A.
, 2006, “
Computational Modeling of Thermal and Electrical fields of a High Power Density Solid Oxide Fuel Cell
,”
Proceedings of FUELCELL2006: The Fourth International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology
, Irvine, CA, Jun. 19–21, Paper No. 97053.
6.
Bessette
,
N. F.
, II
,
Wepfer
,
W. J.
, and
Winnick
,
J.
, 1995, “
A Mathematical Model of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell
,”
J. Electrochem. Soc.
0013-4651,
142
(
11
), pp.
3792
3800
.
7.
Damm
,
D. L.
, and
Fedorov
,
A. G.
, 2005, “
Radiation Heat Transfer in SOFC Materials and Components
,”
J. Power Sources
0378-7753,
143
, pp.
158
165
.
8.
Murthy
,
S.
, and
Fedorov
,
A. G.
, 2003, “
Radiation Heat Transfer Analysis of the Monolith Type Solid Oxide Fuel Cell
,”
J. Power Sources
0378-7753,
124
, pp.
453
458
.
9.
Lundberg
,
W. L.
,
Shockling
,
L. A.
, and
Veyo
,
S. E.
, 2007, “
Evaluation of SOFC Hybrid Power Systems
,”
The Fifth International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology
, Fuel Cell 2007-25237, New York, Jun. 18–20.
You do not currently have access to this content.