A new view is presented on the concept of the combined cycle for power generation. Traditionally, the term “combined cycle” is associated with using a gas turbine in combination with steam turbines to better utilize the exergy potential of the burnt fuel. This concept can be broadened, however, to the utilization of any power-generating facility in combination with steam turbines, as long as this facility also provides a high-temperature waste heat. Such facilities are high temperature fuel cells. Fuel cells are especially advantageous for combined cycle applications since they feature a remarkably high efficiency—reaching an order of 45–50% and even close to 60%, compared to 30–35% for most gas turbines. The literature sources on combining fuel cells with gas and steam turbines clearly illustrate the potential to achieve high power and co-generation efficiencies. In the presented work, the extension to the concept of combined cycle is considered on the example of a molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) working under stationary conditions. An overview of the process for the MCFC is given, followed by the options for heat integration utilizing the waste heat for steam generation. The complete fuel cell combined cycle (FCCC) system is then analyzed to estimate the potential power cost levels that could be achieved. The results demonstrate that a properly designed FCCC system is capable of reaching significantly higher efficiency compared to the standalone fuel cell system. An important observation is that FCCC systems may result in economically competitive power production units, comparable with contemporary fossil power stations.

1.
Karvountzi
,
G. C.
,
Price
,
C. M.
, and
Duby
,
P. F.
, 2004, “
Comparison of Molten Carbonate and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Integration in a Hybrid System for Cogeneration or Tri-generation
,”
ASME, Advanced Energy Systems Division (Publication) AES
,
44
, pp.
139
150
.
2.
Massardo
,
A. L.
, and
Bosio
,
B.
, 2002, “
Assessment of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Models and Integration with Gas and Steam Cycles
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
124
, pp.
103
109
.
3.
Kurz
,
R.
, 2005, “
Parameter Optimization on Combined Gas Turbine—Fuel Cell Power Plants
,”
ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol.
1550-624X,
2
(November 2005), pp.
268
273
.
4.
Linnhoff
,
B.
,
Townsend
,
D. W.
,
Boland
,
D.
,
Hewitt
,
G. F.
,
Thomas
,
B. E. A.
,
Guy
,
A. R.
, and
Marsland
,
R. H.
, 1982 (last edition 1994), “
User Guide on Process Integration for the Efficient Use of Energy
,”
The Institution of Chemical Engineers
, Rugby, UK.
5.
Wall
,
G.
, and
Gong
,
M.
, 1996, “
Exergy Analysis versus Pinch Technology. Efficiency, Costs, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Aspects of Energy Systems
,”
Royal Institute of Technology
, Stockholm, Sweden.
6.
Dhole
,
V. R.
, and
Zheng
,
J. P.
, 1993, “
Applying Combined Pinch and Exergy Analysis to Closed Cycle Gas Turbine System Design
,” Paper presented at
ASME Cogen Turbo Power Conference at Bournemouth
, UK, September 21–23.
7.
Zheng
,
J.
, and
Dhole
,
V. R.
, 1994, “
Conceptual Design of Commercial Power Plants Using the Combined Pinch and Exergy Approach
,” Paper presented at
ASME Cogen Turbo Power Conference
, Portland, Oregon, USA, October 25–27.
8.
Linnhoff
,
B.
, and
Ahmad
,
S.
, 1989, “
Supertargeting: Optimum Synthesis of Energy Management Systems
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
0195-0738,
111
(
3
), pp.
121
130
.
9.
Feng
,
X.
, and
Zhu
,
X. X.
, 1997, “
Combining Pinch and Exergy Analysis for Process Modifications
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
1359-4311,
17
(
3
), pp.
249
261
.
10.
Linnhoff
,
B.
, and
Ahmad
,
S.
, 1990, “
Cost Optimum Heat Exchanger Networks—1. Minimum Energy and Capital Using Simple Models for Capital Cost
,”
Comput. Chem. Eng.
0098-1354,
14
(
7
), pp.
729
750
.
11.
Ahmad
,
S.
,
Linnhoff
,
B.
,
Smith
,
R.
, 1990, “
Cost Optimum Heat Exchanger Networks—2. Targets and Design for Detailed Capital Cost Models
,”
Comput. Chem. Eng.
0098-1354,
14
(
7
), pp.
751
767
.
12.
Zhu
,
X. X.
,
O’Neill
,
B. K.
,
Roach
,
J. R.
, and
Wood
,
R. M.
, 1995, “
A Method for Automated Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis Using Block Decomposition and Nonlinear Optimization
,”
Trans. IChemE, Part C
0960-3085,
73
(A8, November 1995), pp.
919
930
.
13.
Klemeš
,
J.
,
Dhole
,
V. R.
,
Raissi
,
K.
,
Perry
,
S. J.
, and
Puigjaner
,
L.
, 1997, “
Targeting and Design Methodology for Reduction of Fuel, Power and CO2 on Total Sites
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
1359-4311,
17
(
8–10
), pp.
993
1003
.
14.
Smith
,
R.
, 2005,
Chemical Process Design and Integration
,
Wiley
,
Chichester, UK
, p.
687
.
15.
Larminie
,
J.
, and
Dicks
,
A.
, 2000,
Fuel Cell Systems Explained
,
Wiley
,
Chichester, UK
.
16.
Desideri
,
U.
,
Lunghi
,
P.
, and
Ubertini
,
S.
, 2000, “
Thermodynamic Analysis of a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell System Using Waste Derived Fuel Gas
,” ASME AES
40
, pp.
267
275
.
17.
Energy Information Administration
, 2005, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting U.S. Department of Energy, “
Annual Energy Outlook 2005 with Projections to 2025
,” DOE/EIA-0383. (WWW.EIA.DOE.GOVWWW.EIA.DOE.GOV), [Online www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeowww.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo, accessed 7 November 2005].
18.
Varbanov
,
P.
,
Perry
,
S.
,
Klemeš
,
J.
, and
Smith
,
R.
, 2005, “
Synthesis of Industrial Utility Systems: Cost-effective de-carbonisation
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
1359-4311,
25
(
7
), pp.
985
1001
.
19.
SPRINT, Heat Integration Software Tool, 2005 version, Center for Process Integration, CEAS, The University of Manchester, UK.
20.
Varbanov
,
P. S.
, 2004, “
Optimization and Synthesis of Process Utility Systems
,” PhD thesis, UMIST, Manchester, UK.
21.
Shihn
,
H.
, and
Shah
,
R. K.
, 2003, “
Process Integration and Optimization of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell System
,”
Proc. Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology
, Book No. 100638, pp.
363
371
,
ASME
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.