The state-of-the-art conventional technology for postcombustion capture of CO2 from fossil-fueled power plants is based on chemical solvents, which requires substantial energy consumption for regeneration. A promising alternative, available in the near future, is the application of molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFC) for CO2 separation from postcombustion flue gases. Previous studies related to this technology showed both high efficiency and high carbon capture rates, especially when the fuel cell is thermally integrated in the flue gas path of a natural gas-fired combined cycle or an integrated gasification combined cycle plant. This work compares the application of MCFC-based CO2 separation process to pulverized coal fired steam cycles (PCC) and natural gas combined cycles (NGCC) as a “retrofit” to the original power plant. Mass and energy balances are calculated through detailed models for both power plants, with fuel cell behavior simulated using a 0D model calibrated against manufacturers' specifications and based on experimental measurements, specifically carried out to support this study. The resulting analysis includes a comparison of the energy efficiency and CO2 separation efficiency as well as an economic comparison of the cost of CO2 avoided (CCA) under several economic scenarios. The proposed configurations reveal promising performance, exhibiting very competitive efficiency and economic metrics in comparison with conventional CO2 capture technologies. Application as a MCFC retrofit yields a very limited (<3%) decrease in efficiency for both power plants (PCC and NGCC), a strong reduction (>80%) in CO2 emission and a competitive cost for CO2 avoided (25–40 €/ton).

References

References
1.
National Energy Technology Laboratory
,
2007
, “
Carbon Sequestration Technology Roadmap and Program Plan
: Ensuring the Fossil Energy Systems Through the Successful Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, accessed Dec. 23, 2017, http://cepac.cheme.cmu.edu/pasi2008/slides/siirola/library/reading/2007Roadmap.pdf
2.
International Energy Agency
,
2008
, “
CO2 Capture and Storage—A Key Carbon Abatement Option
,” International Energy Agency, Paris, France, accessed Dec. 23, 2017, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/co2-capture-and-storage-a-key-carbon-abatement-option_9789264041417-en
3.
Liang
,
X.
,
Reiner
,
D.
, and
Li
,
J.
,
2011
, “
Perceptions of Opinion Leaders Towards CCS Demonstration Projects in China
,”
Appl. Energy
,
88
(
5)
, pp.
1873
1885
.
4.
U.S. Department of Energy
,
2012
, “
Techno-Economic Analysis of CO2 Capture-Ready Coal-Fired Power Plants
,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, Technical Report No.
NETL/DOE-2012/1581
.
5.
Li
,
M.
,
Rao
,
A. D.
, and
Scott Samuelsen
,
G.
,
2012
, “
Performance and Costs of Advanced Sustainable Central Power Plants With CCS and H2 Co-Production
,”
Appl. Energy
,
91
(
1)
, pp.
43
50
.
6.
Campanari
,
S.
,
2002
, “
Carbon Dioxide Separation From High Temperature Fuel Cell Power Plants
,”
J. Power Sources
,
112
(
1)
, pp.
273
289
.
7.
Sugiura
,
K.
,
Takei
,
K.
,
Tanimoto
,
K.
, and
Miyazaki
,
Y.
,
2003
, “
The Carbon Dioxide Concentrator by Using MCFC
,”
J. Power Sources
,
118
(
1)
, pp.
218
227
.
8.
Amorelli
,
A.
, Wilkinson, M. B., Bedont, P., Capobianco, P., Marcenaro, B., Parodi, F., and Torazza, A.,
2004
, “
An Experimental Investigation Into the Use of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells to Capture CO2 From Gas Turbine Exhaust Gases
,”
Energy
,
29
(
9)
, pp.
1279
1284
.
9.
Chiesa
,
P.
,
Campanari
,
S.
, and
Manzolini
,
G.
,
2011
, “
CO2 Cryogenic Separation From Combined Cycles Integrated With Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
36
(
16)
, pp.
10355
10365
.
10.
Campanari
,
S.
,
Manzolini
,
G.
, and
Chiesa
,
P.
,
2013
, “
Using MCFC for High Efficiency CO2 Capture From Natural Gas Combined Cycles: Comparison of Internal and External Reforming
,”
Appl. Energy
,
112
, pp.
772
783
.
11.
Campanari
,
S.
,
Chiesa
,
P.
,
Manzolini
,
G.
, and
Bedogni
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Economic Analysis of CO2 Capture From Natural Gas Combined Cycles Using Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells
,”
Appl. Energy
,
130
, pp.
562
573
.
12.
Spallina
,
V.
,
Romano
,
M. C.
,
Campanari
,
S.
, and
Lozza
,
G.
, “
Application of MCFC in Coal Gasification Plants for High Efficiency CO
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2011-46274.
13.
Chacartegui
,
R.
,
Monje
,
B.
,
Sánchez
,
D.
,
Becerra
,
J. A.
, and
Campanari
,
S.
,
2013
, “
Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell: Towards Negative Emissions in Wastewater Treatment CHP Plants
,”
Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control
,
19
, pp.
453
461
.
14.
Carapellucci
,
R.
,
Saia
,
R.
, and
Giordano
,
L.
,
2014
, “
Study of Gas-steam Combined Cycle Power Plants Integrated With MCFC for Carbon Dioxide Capture
,”
Energy Procedia
,
45
, pp.
1155
1164
.
15.
Greppi
,
P.
,
Bosio
,
B.
, and
Arato
,
E.
,
2013
, “
Membranes and Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells to Capture CO2 and Increase Energy Production in Natural Gas Power Plants
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
,
52
(
26)
, pp.
8755
8764
.
16.
Franco
,
F.
,
Anantharaman
,
R.
,
Bolland
,
O.
,
Booth
,
N.
,
Van Dorst
,
E.
, Ekstrom, C., Sanchez Fernandes, E., Macchi, E., Manzolini, G., Nikolic, D., Pfeffer, A., Prins, M., Rezvani, S., and Robinson, L.,
2011
, “
European Best Practice Guidelines for Assessment of CO2 Capture Technologies
,” Politecnico di Milano, Alstom, London, Project No.
D4.9
.
17.
U.S. Department of Energy
,
2015
, “
Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Volume 1a: Bituminous Coal (PC) and Natural Gas to Electricity Revision 3
,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, Technical Report No.
1723
.
18.
Samanta
,
S.
, and
Ghosh
,
S.
,
2016
, “
A Thermo-Economic Analysis of Repowering of a 250 MW Coal Fired Power Plant Through Integration of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell With Carbon Capture
,”
Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control
,
51
, pp.
48
55
.
19.
Hart D. L. J.
,
Lehner
,
F.
, and
Rose
,
R.
,
2014
, “
The Fuel Cell Industry Review 2014
,” E4tech, London, accessed Dec. 23, 2017, www.FuelCellIndustryReview.com
20.
Fuel Cell Energy, 2014, “Fuel Cell Energy Communication,” Fuel Cell Energy Inc., Danbury, CT, accessed Dec. 23, 2017, http://www.fuelcellenergy.com
21.
Group Energy Conversion Systems, 2014, “
GS Process Simulation Software
,” Group Energy Conversion Systems, Milan, Italy, accessed Dec. 23, 2017, www.gecos.polimi.it/software/gs.php
22.
Bedogni
,
S.
,
Campanari
,
S.
,
Iora
,
P.
,
Montelatici
,
L.
, and
Silva
,
P.
,
2007
, “
Experimental Analysis and Modeling for a Circular-Planar Type IT-SOFC
,”
J. Power Sources
,
171
(
2)
, pp.
617
625
.
23.
Iora
,
P.
, and
Campanari
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Development of a Three-Dimensional Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Model and Application Hybrid Cycle Simulations
,”
ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol.
,
4
(
4)
, pp. 501–510.
24.
Campanari, S., Iora, P., Macchi, E., and Silva, P., 2007, “Thermodynamic Analysis of Integrated Molten Carbon Fuel Cell–Gas Turbine Cycles for Sub-MW and Multi-Mw Scale Power Generation,”
ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol.
, 4(3), pp. 308–316.
25.
Chiesa
,
P.
, and
Macchi
,
E.
,
2004
, “
A Thermodynamic Analysis of Different Options to Break 60% Electric Efficiency in Combined Cycle Power Plants
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
126
(
4)
, pp.
770
785
.
26.
AspenTech,
2013
, “
Aspen Plus v8.2,” Aspen Technology, Burlington, MA, accessed Dec. 23, 2017
, http://home.aspentech.com/en/products/engineering/aspen-plus
27.
Gas Turbine World
,
2009
, “
GTW Handbook
,” Gas Turbine World, Fairfield, CT.
28.
U.S. Department of Energy,
2011
, “
Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants—Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity–Revision 2
,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, Technical Report No.
DOE/NETL-2010/1397
.
29.
Spinelli
,
M.
,
Romano
,
M. C.
,
Consonni
,
S.
,
Campanari
,
S.
,
Marchi
,
M.
, and
Cinti
,
G.
,
2014
, “
Application of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells in Cement Plants for CO2 Capture and Clean Power Generation
,”
Energy Procedia
,
63
, pp.
6517
6526
.
30.
Dene
,
C.
,
Baker
,
L. A.
, and
Keeth
,
R. J.
,
2008
, “
FGD Performance Capability
,” Power Plant Pollutant Control Mega Symposium, Baltimore, MD, Aug. 25–28, Paper No.
62
.
31.
Babcock Power Inc., and Licata
,
T.
,
2006
, “
What's New in FGD
,”
Electric Power Generation Association Meeting
, Hershey, PA.
32.
Wind
,
T.
,
Güthe
,
F.
, and
Syed
,
K.
,
2014
, “
Co-Firing of Hydrogen and Natural Gases in Lean Premixed Conventional and Reheat Burners (Alstom GT26)
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-25813.
33.
Bonzani
,
F.
,
2008
, “
V94.3A Special Application: Fuelling Hydrogen Enriched Natural Gas
,” PowerGen, Milan, Italy, June 3–5.
34.
Berkenpas
,
B.
,
Frey
,
C.
,
Fry
,
J.
, and
Rubin
,
E. S.
,
2009
, “
Integrated Environmental Control Model
,” Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, accessed Dec. 23, 2017, https://www.cmu.edu/epp/iecm/iecm_docpubs.html
35.
U.S. Department of Energy
,
2011
, “
Analysis of Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell Plant Configurations
,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, Technical Report No.
DOE/NETL-2011-1482
.
36.
National Lime Association
,
2007
, “
Dry Flue Gas Desulfurization Technology Evaluation—Dry Lime vs. Wet Limestone FGD
,” Sargent & Lundy LLC, Chicago, IL, Project No.
11311-001
.
You do not currently have access to this content.