Skip to Main Content

Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants

By
Ivan Vrbanic
Ivan Vrbanic
Search for other works by this author on:
Pranab Samanta
Pranab Samanta
Search for other works by this author on:
Ivica Basic
Ivica Basic
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN:
9780791861394
No. of Pages:
152
Publisher:
ASME Press
Publication date:
2017

Traditional view on “importance” of a particular SSC was associated with its role (function) in ensuring appropriate safety margins (and, hence, low undesirable consequences) in the case of anticipated or credible occurrences. The “importance” of an SSC was related to its quality requirements resulting in a set of deterministic rules and principles for the classification of SSCs into quality groups such as “A”, “B”, “C” and “D” (“Class 1”, “Class 2”, “Class 3” and “Non-Class”). For example, the highest importance with regard to ensuring all safety margins concerning the cooling of the reactor core was given to the integrity of the primary system. Hence, the components of the reactor coolant pressure boundary were assigned Quality Group “A” (or “Class 1”). In the case of primary system integrity failure, ensuring the safety margins relies on the systems with functions such as emergency core cooling and containment heat removal. Thus, those systems were assigned Group “B” (or “Class 2”); supporting systems, such as cooling water systems, to the systems of Group “B” were assigned Group “C” (or “Class 3”), etc.

This content is only available via PDF.
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal