Skip Nav Destination
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
By
Alexander McKenzie-Johnson ,
Alexander McKenzie-Johnson
Geosyntec
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN:
9780791861998
No. of Pages:
412
Publisher:
ASME Press
Publication date:
2020
eBook Chapter
Chapter 41 Managing Risk: Effective Use of Structural Reliability Assessment (SRA) and Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) for Sabah-Sarawak Gas Pipeline (SSGP)
By
Wan M Marzuki Wan Ismail
PETRONAS, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
,
Wan M Marzuki Wan Ismail
Search for other works by this author on:
Mohd Nazmi Mohd Ali Napiah
PETRONAS, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
,
Mohd Nazmi Mohd Ali Napiah
Search for other works by this author on:
Mohd Zazli Mohd Zabidi
PETRONAS, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
,
Mohd Zazli Mohd Zabidi
Search for other works by this author on:
Ahmad Sirwan M Tuselim
PETRONAS, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Ahmad Sirwan M Tuselim
Search for other works by this author on:
Page Count:
8
-
Published:2020
Citation
Ismail, WMMW, Napiah, MNMA, Zabidi, MZM, & Tuselim, ASM. "Managing Risk: Effective Use of Structural Reliability Assessment (SRA) and Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) for Sabah-Sarawak Gas Pipeline (SSGP)." Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG). Ed. Salama, MM, Wang, Y, West, D, McKenzie-Johnson, A, B A-Rahman, A, Wu, G, Tronskar, JP, Hart, J, & Leira, BJ. ASME Press, 2020.
Download citation file:
ABSTRACT
PETRONAS is operating Sabah-Sarawak Gas Pipeline (SSGP) that traverses hilly and mountainous terrain with significant rain fall in East Malaysia i.e. in state of Sabah & Sarawak. SSGP is an important pipeline asset to PETRONAS flowing around 700-800 MMSFCD of sales gas to PETRONAS LNG complex in Bintulu, Sarawak. The pipeline experienced leak in 2014 and 2018. From root cause failure studies, both pipeline failures were due to combination of external force (from geohazards), girth weld defects and under-matched of girth weld. Post incidents in 2014 and 2018, PETRONAS implements strategies in-line with industry practices in managing pipeline integrity...
1.0
INTRODUCTION
2.0SSGP DESIGN INTENT
3.0INSPECTION AND MONITORING PROGRAM
4.0STRUCTURAL RELIABIITY ANALYSIS (SRA)
5.0QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT (QRA)
6.0DISCUSSION
7.0CONCLUSIONS
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Email alerts
Related Chapters
DYNAMIC GEOHAZARD MANAGEMENT IN CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
Corrosion Risk Analysis
Corrosion and Materials in Hydrocarbon Production: A Compendium of Operational and Engineering Aspects
Safety Analysis of NPP, the Role of Risk Assessment, and Measuring Risk Importance
Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants
Risk Importance Measures in NPP Risk Assessment
Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants
Related Articles
Risk Assessment Methodology for Electric-Current Induced Drowning Accidents
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (September,2016)
An Enhanced Failure Mode Effect Analysis-Based Risk Assessment for Subsea Compressor Systems
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (April,2022)
A New Risk Assessment Model to Check Safety Threats to Long-Distance Pipelines
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (October,2022)