Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
Asset Integrity Management of Critical Infrastructure
Editor
Mamdouh M. Salama
Mamdouh M. Salama
MMS4Aim LLC, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Dragan Komljenovic
Dragan Komljenovic
Hydro-Québec, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Jovica R. Riznic
Jovica R. Riznic
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN:
9780791887738
No. of Pages:
180
Publisher:
ASME
Publication date:
2024

Inspection of pipeline to assess the extent of corrosion is performed using in-line inspection (ILI) tools, called intelligent pigs. The two mains ILI tools are magnetic flux leakage (MFL) and ultrasonics. MFL tools are the most widely used because they are applicable for both gas and liquid pipelines. Ultrasonic tools are generally limited to liquid pipelines. These inspection tools, like all inspection tools, suffer from three main uncertainties: Probability of detection (POD), probability of false call POFC) and sizing accuracy. Therefore, the decision regarding the integrity of the pipeline and its remaining safe operating life must account for the influence of these uncertainties. In this paper, two probabilistic approaches are presented. The first approach is based on assessing the extent of corrosion damage based on historical measurement of matching defects and thus it mainly considers the sizing accuracy of the inspection tool. The second approach does not depend on defect matching but accounts for defect population along a pipeline section subjected to similar environmental conditions. This population-based approach accounts for POD, POFC and sizing accuracy. The paper includes example analyses demonstrating the two approaches.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal