Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
Air Engines: The History, Science, and Reality of the Perfect Engine
By
Theodor Finkelstein
Theodor Finkelstein
Search for other works by this author on:
Allan J. Organ
Allan J. Organ
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0791801713
ISBN:
9780791801710
No. of Pages:
288
Publisher:
ASME Press
Publication date:
2009

The new approach has made short work of the ‘traditional’ regenerator problem. However, in the Stirling engine flow is not uniform between switching and pressure is far from constant. On the other hand, convective heat transfer still depends on local, instantaneous temperature difference, ΔT, and acts on fluid particles in motion. The extra features are thus readily added to the formulation. All that is required is a representative map of fluid particle motion to replace the idealized picture of Fig. 8.1. How this is done will be outlined later.

Appropriately coded for computer, the comprehensive approach yields (Organ 1997a) the optimum regenerator — the combination of volumetric porosity, hydraulic radius, etc. for which the combined losses due to hydrodynamic pumping and imperfect heat exchange at given operating conditions (NT, NMA, NSG, etc.) are a minimum. A computer-coded search for the optimum is not the same as an explicit optimum — a traditional, symbolic algebraic formula expressing ideal flow passage geometry in terms of the parameters of engine operation.

However, it is sometimes the case that, when the appropriate approach to a problem has been identified (in this instance, formulation in terms of ΔT), further simplification follows. Used in conjunction with the concept of NTU (Number of Transfer Units) and with insights from temperature solutions yielded by the computer-coded implementation, the ΔT formulation allows just this explicit algebraic statement of the optimum. Results can be displayed in the form of charts, bringing design of the optimum regenerator within reach of anyone who can use a hand calculator. To this extent, regenerator analysis has now taken a form of which Robert Stirling himself might have approved. Indeed, it can be convincingly argued (Chapter 12) that the 1818 engine could not have functioned at all — let alone pumped water — had Stirling not predetermined the wire diameter and winding pitch of the regenerator, possibly along the lines of the material of this chapter. The account is taken largely from the author's paper (2000b) with the permission of the Council of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers.

11.1 Regenerator analysis further simplified
11.2 Some background
11.3 Flush ratio
11.4 Algebraic development
11.4.1 Temperature profile
11.4.2 The ‘flush’ phase in perspective
11.4.3 Temperature recovery ratio
11.4.4 Matrix temperature swing
11.5 Common denominator for losses
11.5.1 Heat transfer and flow friction correlations
11.5.2 Heat transfer loss
11.6 Hydrodynamic pumping loss
11.7 Matrix temperature variation again
11.8 Optimum NTU
11.9 Inference of NTU actually achieved
11.9.1 From temperature recovery ratio, ηT
11.9.2 NTU from mean cycle Nre
11.10 Evaluation of optimum NTU
11.11 Implications
11.12 Complete temperature solutions
11.13 Thermodynamic study of the 1818 engine (continued)
11.14 Interim deductions
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal