2 control, also called torque control, is a popular method for maximizing wind turbine power. For hydrostatic wind turbines, torque control becomes pressure control with pc=K'ω2 because pressure is proportional to torque. Inverse Kω2 control is an alternative approach using rotor speed control with pc=(p/K')1/2. This work analyzes the dynamics of hydrostatic wind turbines using forward and inverse Kω2 control with P-, PD-, PI-, and PID-control for feedback. Dimensionless, linearized models are used. Analysis shows that the mechanical rotor dynamics are much slower than the hydrostatic transmission dynamics and that frictional and leakage losses are negligible. Linear perturbation of the nonlinear model reveals that the closed-loop control is not in Evan's form, so that closed-loop poles and zeros both vary with the loop gain. Pole and zero root locus analysis shows how systems responses change with controller gains. Both control approaches require derivative controller action to sufficiently dampen their responses; both are also fundamentally limited in speed of response by a slow stable pole regardless of controller loop gains. Nonlinear system simulation shows that both control approaches track the maximum power point with nearly identical transient behavior and have nearly identical power losses when using suboptimal values of the control law gain, K. Pressure control has a gain margin of infinity and a phase margin of 99.3 degrees, while speed control has a gain margin of 22.4 dB and a phase margin of 73.8 degrees showing that pressure control is more robust than speed control. Experiments using the power regenerative hydrostatic test stand at the University of Minnesota show that the control approaches have different transient responses but capture comparable power under steady and turbulent conditions.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.