Abstract

Counterbalance valves (CBVs) are widely used in hydraulic machines handling gravitational loads. They are usually adopted in hydraulic circuits that set the flow to the actuator with either metering control strategies or primary control strategies. In these circuits, the CBV does not determine the actuator velocity, but it establishes a proper counterpressure that balances the actuator during overrunning loads. A well-known problem of CBVs is the excessive power consumption introduced into the circuit, which is due to an excessive pressurization of the flow supply. This paper presents a solution for using CBVs to control the actuator velocity while also reducing energy consumption. The method consists in controlling the pilot port of the CBV through an external pressure source (adjustable pilot). The solution is first studied analytically, considering all the possible loading conditions at the actuator. Two different control strategies are presented: the “Smart CBV,” where the CBV does not control the actuator velocity but it minimizes the system pressure; and the “Smart System” that uses the CBV to efficiently control the actuator velocity during overrunning load conditions. An experimental validation of the proposed solutions is also provided, taking as reference a truck-mounted hydraulic crane. The results of the proposed solutions are compared to those achieved by the traditional circuit of the reference hydraulic crane which uses standard CBVs. For both cases of smart CBV and smart system, a remarkable power saving, respectively, up to 75% and up to 90% is observed.

References

1.
Nervegna
,
N.
,
2003
,
Oleodinamica e Pneumatica
,
Politeko
,
Turin, Italy
.
2.
Ritelli
,
G. F.
, and
Vacca
,
A.
,
2013
, “
Energetic and Dynamic Impact of Counterbalance Valves in Fluid Power Machines
,”
Energy Convers. Manag.
,
76
, pp.
701
711
.10.1016/j.enconman.2013.08.021
3.
Andersson
,
B. R.
,
2009
, “
Energy Efficient Load Holding Valve
,”
11th Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power SICFP
, Linköping, Sweden, June
2
4
.
4.
Handroos, H., Halme, J., and Vilenius, M., 1993
, “
Steady State and Dynamic Properties of Counterbalance Valves
,”
Third Scandinavian International Conference Fluid Power
, Linköping, Sweden, May 25–26.
5.
Sørensen
,
J. K.
,
Hansen
,
M. R.
, and
Ebbesen
,
M. K.
,
2016
, “
Novel Concept for Stabilising a Hydraulic Circuit Containing Counterbalance Valve and Pressure Compensated Flow Supply
,”
International Journal of Fluid Power
,
17
(
3
), pp.
153
162
.10.1080/14399776.2016.1172446
6.
Zähe
,
B.
,
1995
, “
Stability of Load Holding Circuits With Counterbalance Valves
,”
Proceedings of Eighth International
,
Bath Fluid Power Work
, Bath, UK, Sept.
20
22
.
7.
Chapple
,
P. J.
, and
Tilley
,
D. G.
,
1994
, “
Evaluation Techniques for the Selection of Counterbalance Valves
,”
Proceedings of Expo Technical Conference Electrohydraulic Electropneumatic Motion Control Technology, Anaheim, CA
.
8.
Miyakawa
,
S.
,
1978
, “
Stability of a Hydraulic Circuit With a Counter-Balance Valve
,”
Bull. JSME 21
,
162
, pp.
1750
1756
.
9.
Zhao
,
L.
,
Liu
,
X.
, and
Wang
,
T.
,
2010
, “
Influence of Counterbalance Valve Parameters on Stability of the Crane Lifting System
,”
IEEE International Conference Mechatronics and Automation ICMA 2010
, Xi'an, China, Aug. 4–7, pp.
1010
1014
.10.1109/ICMA.2010.5589356
10.
Ritelli
,
G. F.
, and
Vacca
,
A.
,
2014
, “
A General Auto-Tuning Method for Active Vibration Damping of Mobile Hydraulic Machines
,”
ASME
Paper No. FPNI2014-7858
.10.1115/FPNI2014-7858
11.
Abuowda
,
K.
,
Okhotnikov
,
I.
,
Noroozi
,
S.
,
Godfrey
,
P.
, and
Dupac
,
M.
,
2020
, “
A Review of Electrohydraulic Independent Metering Technology
,”
ISA Trans.
,
98
, pp.
364
381
.10.1016/j.isatra.2019.08.057
12.
Koivumaki
,
J.
, and
Mattila
,
J.
,
2013
, “
An Energy-Efficient High Performance Motion Control of a Hydraulic Crane Applying Virtual Decomposition Control
,”
IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
, Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 3–7, pp.
4426
4433
.10.1109/IROS.2013.6696992
13.
Lyu
,
L.
,
Chen
,
Z.
, and
Yao
,
B.
,
2021
, “
Advanced Valves and Pump Coordinated Hydraulic Control Design to Simultaneously Achieve High Accuracy and High Efficiency
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
,
29
(
1
), pp.
236
248
.10.1109/TCST.2020.2974180
14.
Wang
,
M.
, and
Rannow
,
M. B.
,
2019
, “
Control Strategy for Hydraulic Actuator With a Pair of Independent Metering Valves
,” U.S. Patent No. 10,408,238.
15.
SAUER DANFOSS
,
2013
, “Proportional Valve PVX”.
16.
Sniderman
,
D.
,
2012
, “
Reducing the Environmental Impact of Hydraulic Systems
,”
SAE
Off Highway Engineering Online.https://www.sae.org/publications/magazines/content/12ofhd1108/
17.
Weber
,
S.
, and
Bianchi
,
R.
,
2019
, “
Hydraulic System With a Counterbalance Valve Configured as a Meter Out Valve and Controlled by an Independent Pilot Signal
,” U.S. Patent No. 10,428,845.
18.
Boschrexroth
,
2007
, “
Load Holding—Motion Control
,” 00171/02.07.
19.
Walvoil S.p.A
,
2010
, “Overcenter Valves 1516 Series.”
20.
Handroos,
1993
, “
Steady State and Dynamic Properties of Counterbalance Valves
,”
Proceedings of Third Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power
, Linköping, Sweden, May
25
26
.
21.
Zähe
,
B.
,
Anders
,
P.
, and
Ströbel
,
S.
,
2016
, “
A New Energy Saving Load Adaptive Counterbalance Valve
,” 10th International Conference on Fluid Power, Dresden, Germany, Mar. 8–10, pp.
425
436
.
22.
Hansen
,
M. R.
,
Pedersen
,
P.
,
Andersen
,
T. O.
, and
Conrad
,
F.
,
2004
, “
Design of Over Center Valves Based on Predictable Performance
,”
ASME
Paper No. IMECE2004-61654.10.1115/IMECE2004-61654
23.
Sciancalepore
,
A.
,
Vacca
,
A.
,
Pena
,
O.
, and
Weber
,
S. T.
,
2019
,
Lumped Parameter Modeling of Counterbalance Valves Considering the Effect of Flow Forces,
ASME
Paper No. FPMC2019-1650. Proceedings of the ASME/BATH 2019 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control. ASME/BATH 2019 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control. Longboat Key, Florida, Oct. 7–9, Vol. 59339.10.1115/FPMC2019-1650
You do not currently have access to this content.