In the recent years, industries have been working on the online condition monitoring of systems and components in order to definitely abandon the time-based maintenance and switch efficiently to a condition-based maintenance. Therefore, the research field related to prognostics and health management (PHM) has been gaining more and more importance. In the field of hydraulic pumps and motors, the overall efficiency is an important parameter to monitor and the thermodynamic method has historically been proposed for the online evaluation of this parameter for hydraulic machines without external drainage. Indeed, for this kind of machines, the thermodynamic method allows the evaluation of the overall efficiency by measuring only the temperatures and the pressures at the suction and the delivery ports, thus avoiding the use of cumbersome and expensive sensors, such as flow meters and torque sensors. This paper investigates the use of the thermodynamic method for hydraulic machines with external drainage. The case study of a swash-plate type axial-piston pump is considered. In this first part of the project, the objective was to validate the proposed thermodynamic method by comparing its results with the ones obtained through the mechanical, therefore an extensive experimental activity was carried out and two flow meters were used to measure the drainage and the delivery flow rates. The pump was tested in different operating conditions and the uncertainty related to the overall efficiency was calculated accurately in order to compare the two approaches properly.

References

1.
Barbillon
,
L.
, and
Poirson
,
A.
,
1920
, “
Sur une méthode thermométrique de mesure du rendement des turbines hydrauliques
,”
La Houille Blanche
, Société Hydrotechnique de France, Paris, France, pp.
217
221
.
2.
IEC,
1991
, “Field Acceptance Tests to Determine the Hydraulic Performance of Hydraulic Turbines, Storage Pumps and Pump-Turbines,” International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No.
IEC 60041
.https://www.saiglobal.com/pdftemp/previews/osh/iec/iec60000/60000/iec60041%7Bed3.0%7Den_d.img.pdf
3.
ISO,
1998
, “Centrifugal, Mixed-Flow and Axial Pumps—Code for Hydraulic Performance Tests—Precision Class,” International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No.
EN ISO 5198:1998
.https://infostore.saiglobal.com/store/details.aspx/details.aspx?ProductID=249184
4.
Lanzersdorfer
,
J.
, and
Götsch
,
L.
,
2015
, “
Analytical Solutions Using the Thermodynamic Efficiency Method for Absolute Flow Measurement
,”
Flow Meas. Instrum.
,
44
, pp.
89
96
.
5.
Patil
,
S. S.
,
Verma
,
H. K.
, and
Kumar
,
A.
,
2010
, “
Efficiency Measurement of Hydro Machine by Thermodynamic Method
,” Eighth International Group for Hydraulic Efficiency Measurement (
IGHEM
) Conference, Roorkee, India, Oct. 21–23, pp. 181–189.http://www.ighem.org/Paper2010/TSD05.pdf
6.
Milne
,
A. J.
,
1990
, “
Implications of Measurement Uncertainty When Using the Thermodynamic Method of Pump Efficiency Monitoring in Water
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
,
204
(
2
), pp.
109
119
.
7.
Kjølle
,
A.
,
1993
, “
The Thermodynamic Method Applied to Hydraulic Transmission
,”
JHPS International Symposium on Fluid Power
, Tokyo, Japan, Sept. 6–9, pp.
639
644
.
8.
Dalla Lana
,
E.
, and
De Negri
,
V. J.
,
2006
, “A New Evaluation Method for Hydraulic Gear Pump Efficiency Through Temperature Measurements,”
SAE
Paper No. 2006-01-3503.
9.
Andersson
,
J.
,
Krus
,
P.
,
Nilsson
,
K.
, and
Storck
,
K.
,
1999
, “
Modelling and Simulation of Heat Generation in Electro-Hydrostatic Actuation System
,”
Fourth JHPS International Symposium on Fluid Power
, Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 15–17, pp. 537–542.
10.
Feng
,
H. D.
,
Xu
,
L.
,
Xu
,
R. P.
,
Wu
,
L. J.
,
Shi
,
X. H.
,
Yan
,
J. D.
, and
Wang
,
T. Y.
,
2004
, “
Uncertainty Analysis Using the Thermodynamic Method of Pump Efficiency Testing
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C
,
218
, pp.
543
555
.
11.
Abgottspon
,
A.
,
Briggeler
,
M.
, and
Staubli
,
T.
,
2010
, “
Corrective Terms of Thermodynamic Efficiency Measurements
,” Eighth International Group for Hydraulic Efficiency Measurement (
IGHEM
) Conference, Roorkee, India, Oct. 21–23, pp. 156–170.http://www.ighem.org/Paper2010/TSD03.pdf
12.
Ramdal
,
J.
,
2011
, “Efficiency Measurements in Low Head Hydro Power Plants,”
Ph.D. thesis
, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/234506
13.
Merry
,
S. L.
, and
Thew
,
M. T.
,
1984
, “
Evaluation of a Thermodynamic Method for Efficiency Measurements on a Low-Pressure Pump in Water and Mercury
,”
J. Phys. E
,
17
(
11
), pp. 1066–1070.
14.
JCGM
,
2008
, “Evaluation of Measurement Data—Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement,” Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, No. JCGM 100:2008.
15.
ISO
,
2007
, “Hydraulic Fluid Power—Positive Displacement Pumps, Motors and Integral Transmissions—Determination of Steady-State Performance,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO
4409:2007
.https://www.standard.no/no/Nettbutikk/produktkatalogen/Produktpresentasjon/?ProductID=244517
16.
Bergman
,
T. L.
,
Lavine
,
A. S.
,
Incropera
,
F. P.
, and
De Witt
,
D. P.
,
2011
,
Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer
, 7th ed.,
Wiley
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
17.
Groepper
,
C. W.
,
Cui
,
T.
,
Li
,
P. Y.
, and
Stelson
,
K. A.
,
2006
, “
Design of Integrated Pressure, Flow, and Temperature Sensor for Hydraulic Systems
,”
Power Transmission and Motion Control Symposium
, Bath, UK, Sept. 13–15, pp. 321–334.
18.
Martins
,
M. A. F.
,
Requião
,
R.
, and
Kalid
,
R. A.
,
2011
, “
Generalized Expressions of Second and Third Order for the Evaluation of Standard Measurement Uncertainty
,”
Measurement
,
44
(
9
), pp.
1526
1530
.
You do not currently have access to this content.