In this paper, solvability conditions for disturbance accommodating control (DAC) have been discussed and applied on wind turbine controller design in above-rated wind speed to regulate rotor speed and to mitigate turbine structural loads. An asymptotically stabilizing DAC controller with disturbance impact on the wind turbine being totally canceled out can be found if certain conditions are fulfilled. Designing a rotor speed regulation controller without steady-state error is important for applying linear control methodology such as DAC on wind turbines. Therefore, solvability conditions of DAC without steady-state error are attractive and can be taken as examples when designing a multitask turbine controller. DAC controllers solved via Moore–Penrose Pseudoinverse and the Kronecker product are discussed, and solvability conditions of using them are given. Additionally, a new solvability condition based on inverting the feed-through D term is proposed for the sake of reducing computational burden in the Kronecker product. Applications of designing collective pitch and independent pitch controllers based on DAC are presented. Recommendations of designing a DAC-based wind turbine controller are given. A DAC controller motivated by the proposed solvability condition that utilizes the inverse of feed-through D term is developed to mitigate the blade flapwise once-per-revolution bending moment together with a standard proportional integral controller in the control loop to assist rotor speed regulation. Simulation studies verify the discussed solvability conditions of DAC and show the effectiveness of the proposed DAC control design methodology.

References

References
1.
Johnson
,
C. D.
,
1986
, “
Disturbance Accommodating Control: An Overview
,”
American Control Conference
, June 18–20, pp.
526
536
.
2.
Lee
,
Y. J.
,
Balas
,
M. J.
, and
Waites
,
H.
,
1995
, “
Disturbance Accommodating Control for Completely Unknown Persistent Disturbances
,”
Proceedings of the American Controls Conference
, Vol.
2
, pp.
1463
1468
.
3.
Balas
,
M. J.
,
1990
, “
Active Control of Persistent Disturbances in Large Precision Aerospace Structures
,”
SPIE, Advances in Optical Structure Systems
, Vol.
1303
, pp. 360–370.
4.
Wright
,
A. D.
,
2004
, “
Modern Control Design for Flexible Wind Turbines
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO,
NREL
Technical Report No. TP-500-35816.
5.
Stol
,
K.
, and
Balas
,
M.
,
2003
, “
Periodic Disturbance Accommodating Control for Blade Load Mitigation in Wind Turbines
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
125
(
4
), pp.
379
385
.
6.
Hand
,
M.
,
Johnson
,
K. E.
,
Fingersh
,
L. J.
, and
Wright
,
A. D.
,
2004
, “
Advanced Control Design and Field Testing for Wind Turbines at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO,
NREL
Technical Report No. CP-500-36118.
7.
Namik
,
H.
, and
Stol
,
K.
,
2013
, “
Individual Blade Pitch Control of a Spar-Buoy Floating Wind Turbine
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
,
22
(
1
), pp.
214
223
.
8.
Namik
,
H.
, and
Stol
,
K.
,
2010
, “
Individual Blade Pitch Control of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Wind Energy
,
13
(
1
), pp.
74
85
.
9.
Stol
,
K. A.
,
Zhao
,
W.
, and
Wright
,
A. D.
,
2006
, “
Individual Blade Pitch Control for the Controls Advanced Research Turbine CART
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
128
(
4
), pp.
498
505
.
10.
Wright
,
A. D.
,
Fingersh
,
L. J.
, and
Stol
,
K. A.
,
2009
, “
Testing Controls to Mitigate Fatigue Loads in the Controls Advanced Research Turbine
,”
17th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation
, Thessaloniki, Greece, June 24–26, pp.
1275
1282
.
11.
Wright
,
A.
,
Fleming
,
P.
, and
van Wingerden
,
J.
,
2011
, “
Refinements and Tests of an Advanced Controller to Mitigate Fatigue Loads in the Controls Advanced Research Turbine
,”
49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
, Orlando, FL, Jan. 4–7,
NREL
Report No. CP-5000-50006.
12.
Imran
,
R. M.
,
Hussain
,
D. M. A.
, and
Soltani
,
M.
,
2014
, “
DAC With LQR Control Design for Pitch Regulated Variable Speed Wind Turbine
,” 36th International IEEE Telecommunications Energy Conference (
INTELEC
), Sept. 28–Oct. 2.
13.
Imran
,
R. M.
,
Hussain
,
D. M. A.
, and
Soltani
,
M.
,
2015
, “
DAC to Mitigate the Effect of Periodic Disturbances on Drive Train using Collective Pitch for Variable Speed Wind Turbine
,”
IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology
(
ICIT
), pp.
2588
2593
.
14.
Balas
,
M.
,
Lee
,
Y. J.
, and
Kendall
,
L.
,
1998
, “
Disturbance Tracking Control Theory With Application to Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines
,”
AIAA
Paper No. AIAA-98-0032.
15.
Pace
,
A.
, and
Johnson
,
K. E.
,
2013
, “
LIDAR-Based Extreme Event Control to Prevent Wind Turbine Overspeed
,” AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit,
AIAA
Paper No. AIAA 2013-0315.
16.
Wang
,
N.
,
Wright
,
A. D.
,
Johnson
,
K. E.
, and
Carcangiu
,
C. E.
,
2014
, “
LIDAR-assisted Wind Turbine Feedforward Torque Controller Design Below Rated
,”
American Control Conference
(
ACC
), Portland, OR, June 4–6, pp.
3728
3733
.
17.
Balas
,
M.
,
Gajendar
,
S.
, and
Robertson
,
L.
,
2009
, “
Adaptive Tracking Control of Linear Systems With Unknown Delays and Persistent Disturbances (or Who You Callin’ Retarded?)
,”
AIAA
Paper No. AIAA 2009-5855.
18.
Jonkman
,
J.
, and
Buhl
,
M. L.
,
2005
, “
FAST User's Guide
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO,
NREL
Technical Report No. EL-500-38230.
19.
Kelley
,
N. D.
, and
Jonkman
,
B. J.
,
2007
, “
Overview of the Turbsim Stochastic Inflow Turbulence Simulator: Version 1.21 (Revised Feb. 1, 2007)
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO,
NREL
Technical Report No. TP-500-41137.
20.
Bossanyi
,
E. A.
, and
Hassan
,
G.
,
2003
, “
Individual Blade Pitch Control for Load Reduction
,”
Wind Energy
,
6
(
2
), pp.
119
128
.
21.
Schlipf
,
D.
,
Fischer
,
T.
,
Carcangiu
,
C. E.
,
Rossetti
,
M.
, and
Bossanyi
,
E.
,
2010
, “
Load Analysis of Look-ahead Collective Pitch Control Using Lidar LIDAR
,”
German Wind Energy Conference
(
DEWEK
), Bremen, Germany, Nov. 17–18.
22.
Dunne
,
F.
,
Pao
,
L.
,
Wright
,
A. D.
,
Jonkman
,
B.
, and
Kelley
,
N.
,
2010
, “
Combining Standard Feedback Controllers With Feedforward Blade Pitch Control for Load Mitigation in Wind Turbines
,” 48th
AIAA
Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition Orlando, FL, Jan. 4–7.
23.
Wang
,
N.
,
Johnson
,
K. E.
, and
Wright
,
A. D.
,
2011
, “
FX-RLS-Based Feedforward Control for Lidar-Enabled Wind Turbine Load Mitigation
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
,
20
(
5
), pp.
1212
1222
.
You do not currently have access to this content.