Digital hydraulics uses simple and cheap on/off valves in order to replace expensive proportional valves. Furthermore, with fast switching hydraulic converters the energy efficiency can be raised compared to proportional valve control. The hydraulic buck converter (HBC) represents an energy efficient and cost-effective switched inertance system, because its inductance is realized by a simple pipe. In this paper, a prototype for a hydraulic linear cylinder drive controlled by an HBC is presented. Characteristic for this drive axis is that the HBC is directly mounted on the cylinder, which allows a reduction of the oil transport loss between the axis and the hydraulic power supply unit. Furthermore, piston accumulators are used for decoupling and pressure attenuation. Due to their robustness regarding the prepressure to operating pressure, the load pressure can be controlled arbitrary in the piston-sided chamber. The energy performance and the tracking behavior of the axis with a flatness-based control (FBC) are investigated by steady-state measurements and dynamic trajectories, respectively. The results are discussed and an outlook about further improvements of the concept is provided.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Keywords:
Energy systems , Fluid control systems, Mechatronics, Motion controls, Control systems
Topics:
Cylinders, Flow (Dynamics), Pipes, Pistons, Pressure, Stress, Valves, Engineering prototypes, Secondary cells, Fluidized bed combustion, Steady state

References

1.
Linjama
,
M.
, and
Vilenius
,
M.
,
2007
, “
Digital Hydraulics—Towards Perfect Valve Technology
,” 10th
Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power, SICFP’07
, Tampere, Finland, May 21–23, Vol. (3), pp. 181–196.
2.
Linjama
,
M.
,
2011
, “
Digital Fluid Power—State of the Art
,” 12th
Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power
,
SICFP’11
, Tampere, Finland, May 18–20, Vol. 3(4), pp. 331–353.
3.
Brown
,
F. T.
,
1987
, “
Switched Reactance Hydraulics: A New Way to Control Fluid Power
,”
National Conference on Fluid Power
, pp.
25
–
33
.
4.
Brown
,
F. T.
,
Tentarelli
,
S. C.
, and
Ramachandran
,
S.
,
1988
, “
A Hydraulic Rotary Switched-Inertance Servo Transformer
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
,
110
(
2
), pp.
144
–
150
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
5.
Gall
,
H.
, and
Senn
,
K.
,
1994
, “
Freilaufventile—Ansteuerungskonzept zur Energieeinsparung bei hydraulischen Linearantrieben
,”
Hydraul. Pneum.
,
38
(1–2), pp.
38
–
43
.
6.
Scheidl
,
R.
,
Schindler
,
D.
,
Riha
,
G.
, and
Leitner
,
W.
,
1995
, “
Basics for the Energy-Efficient Control of Hydraulic Drives by Switching Techniques
,”
3rd Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics
,
J.
Lückel
, ed., pp. 118–131.
7.
Scheidl
,
R.
,
Garstenauer
,
M.
, and
Grammer
,
S.
,
1996
, “
The Resonance Converter—A Novel Method for Hydraulic Fluid Power Control
,” Mechatronics'96, Guimaraes, Portugal, Vol. 2, pp. 191–196.
8.
Scheidl
,
R.
, and
Riha
,
G.
,
1999
, “
Energy Efficient Switching Control by a Hydraulic Resonance Converter
,”
Workshop on Power Transmission and Motion Control (PTMC’99)
,
C. R.
Burrows
 and
K.
Edge
, eds., Bath, UK, Sept. 8–11, pp.
267
–
273
.
9.
Kogler
,
H.
,
2012
, “
The Hydraulic Buck Converter—Conceptual Study and Experiments
,” Ph.D. thesis, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
10.
Johnston
,
N. D.
,
2009
, “
A Switched Inertance Device for Efficient Control of Pressure and Flow
,”
ASME
Paper No. DSCC2009-2535.
11.
Pan
,
M.
,
Johnston
,
N. D.
,
Plummer
,
A.
,
Kudzma
,
S.
, and
Hillis
,
A.
,
2013
, “
Theoretical and Experimental Studies of a Switched Inertance Hydraulic System
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part I
,
28
(1), pp.
12
–
25
.
12.
Negri
,
V. J. D.
,
Wang
,
P.
,
Plummer
,
A.
, and
Johnston
,
N. D.
,
2015
, “
Behavioural Prediction of Hydraulic Step-Up Switching Converters
,”
Int. J. Fluid Power
,
15
(1), pp.
1
–
9
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
13.
Scheidl
,
R.
, and
Manhartsgruber
,
B.
,
2005
, “
State of the Art in Hydraulic Switching Control—Components, Systems, Applications
,” 9th
Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power, SICFP'05
, Linköping, Sweden, June 1–3, Vol. 1, p. 46.
14.
Winkler
,
B.
,
2004
, “
Development of a Fast Low-Cost Switching Valve for Big Flow Rates
,” 3rd
FPNI Ph.D. Symposium on Fluid Power
, Terassa, Spain, pp. 599–506.
15.
Winkler
,
B.
, and
Scheidl
,
R.
,
2006
, “
Optimization of a Fast Switching Valve for Big Flow Rates
,” Bath Workshop on Power Transmission and Motion Control,
PTMC 2006
, Bath, UK, pp. 387–399.
16.
Winkler
,
B.
,
Plckinger
,
A.
, and
Scheidl
,
R.
,
2008
, “
Components for Digital and Switching Hydraulics
,” First Workshop on Digital Fluid Power, DFP08, Tampere, Finland, pp. 53–76.
17.
Yamamoto
,
K.
,
Aribowo
,
A.
,
Hayamizu
,
Y.
,
Hirose
,
T.
, and
Kawahara
,
K.
,
2002
, “
Visualization of the Helical Pipe Flow
,”
Fluid Dyn. Res.
,
30
(
4
), pp.
251
–
267
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
18.
Kogler
,
H.
, and
Scheidl
,
R.
,
2015
, “
Linear Motion Control With a Low Power Hydraulic Switching Converter—Part I: Concept, Test Rig, Simulations
,”
J. Syst. Control Eng., Part I
,
229
(8), pp.
677
–
684
.
19.
Kogler
,
H.
, and
Scheidl
,
R.
,
2015
, “
Linear Motion Control With a Low Power Hydraulic Switching Converter—Part II: Flatness Based Control
,”
J. Syst. Control Eng., Part I
,
229
, pp.
818
–
828
.
20.
Schepers
,
I.
,
Weiler
,
D.
, and
Weber
,
J.
,
2012
, “
Comparison and Evaluation of Digital Control Methods for ON/OFF Valves
,” Fifth Workshop on Digital Fluid Power, pp. 103–121.
21.
Kogler
,
H.
, and
Scheidl
,
R.
,
2012
, “
The Hydraulic Buck Converter Exploiting the Load Capacitance
,” 8th IFK-Fluid Power Drives, Mar. 26–28, Dresden, Germany, Vol. 2, pp. 297–309.
22.
Steele
,
A.
,
Bayer
,
I.
, and
Loth
,
E.
,
2008
, “
Inherently Superoleophobic Nanocomposite Coatings by Spray Atomization
,”
Nano Lett.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
501
–
505
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.