State-feedback gain-scheduling controller synthesis with guaranteed performance is considered in this brief. Practical assumption has been considered in the sense that scheduling parameters are assumed to be uncertain. The contribution of this paper is the characterization of the control synthesis that parameterized linear matrix inequalities (PLMIs) to synthesize robust gain-scheduling controllers. Additive uncertainty model has been used to model measurement noise of the scheduling parameters. The resulting controllers not only ensure robustness against scheduling parameters uncertainties but also guarantee closed-loop performance in terms of and performances as well. Numerical examples and simulations are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the synthesized controller. Compared to other control design methods from literature, the synthesized controllers achieve less conservative results as measurement noise increases.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2016
Technical Briefs
Guaranteed Performance State-Feedback Gain-Scheduling Control With Uncertain Scheduling Parameters
Jongeun Choi
Jongeun Choi
Search for other works by this author on:
Ali Khudhair Al-Jiboory
Guoming G. Zhu
Jongeun Choi
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received December 10, 2014; final manuscript received September 20, 2015; published online October 29, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Ryozo Nagamune.
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. Jan 2016, 138(1): 014502 (7 pages)
Published Online: October 29, 2015
Article history
Received:
December 10, 2014
Revised:
September 20, 2015
Citation
Al-Jiboory, A. K., Zhu, G. G., and Choi, J. (October 29, 2015). "Guaranteed Performance State-Feedback Gain-Scheduling Control With Uncertain Scheduling Parameters." ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. January 2016; 138(1): 014502. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031727
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Vibration Suppression Based on Improved Adaptive Optimal Arbitrary-Time-Delay Input Shaping
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (May 2025)
Robust Fault Detection for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Subject to Denial-of-Service Attacks
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Vibration Suppression and Trajectory Tracking with Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for UAM Aircraft
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Learning battery model parameter dynamics from data with recursive Gaussian process regression
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Related Articles
Stochastic Finite-Time Stabilization for a Class of Nonlinear Markovian Jump Stochastic Systems With Impulsive Effects
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (April,2015)
A Note on Observer-Based Frequency Control for a Class of Systems Described by Uncertain Models
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (February,2018)
On Simple Design of Nonlinear Observers for Robust Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (July,2015)
Robust Control of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems: A Nonlinear DOBC Approach
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (July,2016)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Fault-Tolerant Control of Sensors and Actuators Applied to Wind Energy Systems
Electrical and Mechanical Fault Diagnosis in Wind Energy Conversion Systems
GA Based Competitive Multi-Agent Controller for Nonlinear System
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Dynamic Simulations to Become Expert in Order to Set Fuzzy Rules in Real Systems
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, 4th (ICACTE 2011)