With respect to weight, energy consumption, and cost constraints, hydro-active suspension system is a suitable choice for improving vehicle ride comfort while keeping its handling. The aim of sensors selection is determining number, location, and type of sensors, which are the best for control purposes. Selection of sensors is related to the selection of measured variables (outputs). Outputs selection may limit performance and also affect reliability and complexity of control systems. In the meanwhile, hardware, implementation, maintenance, and repairing costs can be affected by this issue. In this study, systematic methods for selecting the viable outputs for hydro-active suspension system of a passenger car are implemented. Having joint robust stability and nominal performance of the closed loop is the main idea in this selection. In addition, it is very important to use these methods as a complementation for system physical insights, not supersedes. So, in the first place the system is described and the main ideas in ride comfort control are addressed. An 8 degrees of freedom model of vehicle with passive suspension system is derived and validated. Both linear and nonlinear models of the car which is equipped with hydro-active subsystem are derived. After selecting the outputs, for benefiting from minimum loop interactions, the control configuration is systematically determined. The main goal of selecting control configuration is assessing the possibility of achieving a decentralized control configuration. Finally, the system behavior is controlled by a decentralized proportional–integral–differential (PID) controller. The results indicate the efficiency of the controlled hydro-active suspension system in comparison with the passive system.

References

1.
Foss
,
A. S.
,
1973
, “
Critique of Chemical Process Control Theory
,”
AIChE J.
,
19
, pp.
209
214
.10.1002/aic.690190202
2.
Findeisen
,
W.
,
Bailey
,
F. N.
,
Brdys
,
M.
,
Malinowski
,
K.
,
Tatjewski
,
P.
, and
Wozniak
,
A.
,
1980
,
Control and Coordination in Hierarchical Systems
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
.
3.
Morari
,
M.
,
1982
, “
Integrated Plant Control: A Solution at Hand or a Research Topic for the Next Decade
,”
CPC-II
, Proceeding of Chemical Process Control, 2 ALChE,
New York
, pp.
467
495
.
4.
Khaki Sedigh
,
A.
,
1991
, “
Transmission Zeros Assignment for Linear Multivariable Plants
,”
10th IASTED International Symposium
,
Imsbruck
,
Austria
, pp.
239
242
.
5.
Nett
,
C. N.
,
1989
, “
A Quantitative Approach to the Selection and Partitioning of Measurements and Manipulations for the Control of Complex Systems
,”
Presentation at Caltech Control Workshop
.
6.
Reeves
,
D. E.
,
1991
, “
A Comprehensive Approach to Control Configuration Design for Complex Systems
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Georgia Institute of Technology
,
Atlanta, GA
.
7.
Van de Wal
,
M.
, and
Jager
,
B.
,
2001
, “
A Review of Methods for Input/Output Selection
,”
Automatica
,
37
, pp.
487
510
.10.1016/S0005-1098(00)00181-3
8.
Rinard
,
I. H.
, and
Downs
,
J. J.
,
1992
, “
Plant Wide Control: A Review and Critique
,”
AIChE Spring Meeting
,
New Orleans
, Paper No. 67f.
9.
Luyben
,
W. L.
,
Tyreus
,
B. D.
, and
Luyben
,
M.
,
1998
,
Plantwide Process Control
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
10.
Alstad
,
V.
,
2005
, “
Studies on Selection of Controlled Variables
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
,
Trondheim, Norway
.
11.
Narraway
,
L.
, and
Perkins
,
J.
,
1994
, “
Selection of Process Control Structures Based in Economics
,”
Comput. Chem. Eng.
,
18
(supplement), pp.
S511
S515
.10.1016/0098-1354(94)80083-9
12.
Wolff
,
E. A.
, and
Skogestad
,
S.
,
1994
, “
Operability of Integrated Plants
,”
PSE ‘94
,
Korea
, pp.
63
69
.
13.
Khaki Sedigh
,
A.
, and
Moaveni
,
B.
,
2009
,
Control Configuration Selection for Multivariable Plants
,
Springer
,
New York
.
14.
Moore
,
C.
,
Hackney
,
J.
, and
Carter
,
D.
,
1987
, “
Selecting Sensor Location and Type for Multivariable Processes
,”
Shell Process Control Workshop
,
Butterworths
,
Boston
, pp.
291
308
.
15.
Keller
,
J. P.
, and
Bonvin
,
D.
,
1987
, “
Selection of Inputs for the Purpose of Model Reduction and Controller Design
,”
IFAC 10th Triennial World Congress
,
Munich
,
Germany
, pp.
209
214
.
16.
Kumar
,
S.
, and
Seinfeld
,
J. H.
,
1978
, “
Optimal Location of Measurements in Tubular Reactors
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
,
33
, pp.
1507
1516
.10.1016/0009-2509(78)85201-4
17.
Samar
,
R.
, and
Postlethwaite
,
I.
,
1994
, “
Multivariable Controller Design for a High Performance Aero-Engine
,”
IEE International Conference on Control ‘94
,
Coventry, UK
, Vol.
2
, pp.
1312
1317
.
18.
Braatz
,
R. D.
,
Lee
,
J. H.
, and
Morari
,
M.
,
1996
, “
Screening Plant Designs and Control Structures for Uncertain Systems
,”
Comput. Chem. Eng.
,
20
(
4
), pp.
463
468
.10.1016/0098-1354(95)00036-4
19.
Nabaglo
,
T.
,
2006
, “
Controller of Magneto-Rheological Semi-Active Car Suspension
,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2006-01-1969.
20.
Güclü
,
R.
,
2003
, “
Active Control of Seat Vibrations of a Vehicle Model Using Various Suspension Alternatives
,”
Turk. J. Eng. Environ. Sci.
,
27
, pp.
361
373
.
21.
Sarshari
,
E.
,
Asadi
,
N.
, and
Yousefi
,
R.
,
2010
, “
Design of Hydractive Optimal Suspension for a Passenger Vehicle
,”
ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition
, Technical Paper No. IMECE2010-40630.
22.
Taghirad
,
H. D.
, and
Esmailzadeh
,
E.
,
1998
, “
Automobile Passenger Comfort Assured Through LQG/LQR Active Suspension
,”
J. Vib. Control
,
4
(
5
), pp.
603
618
.10.1177/107754639800400504
23.
El-Demerdash
,
S. M.
,
2002
, “
Improvement of Trucks Ride Dynamics Using a Hydraulic Semi-Active Suspension System
,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2002-01-3039.
24.
Soliman
,
A. M. A.
,
Abd Alla
,
S. A.
,
El-Mashed
,
Y. A.
, and
Hamid
,
M. S. A.
,
2006
, “
Improvement of Vehicle Ride Performance Using a Hydro-Pneumatic Active Suspension System
,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2006-01-1298.
25.
Abd-El-Tawwab
,
A. M.
,
2002
, “
Semi-Active Twin-Accumulator Suspension System
,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2002-01-0985.
26.
Bouazara
,
M.
,
Richard
,
M. J.
, and
Rakheja
,
S.
,
2006
, “
Safety and Comfort Analysis of a 3D-Vehicle Model With Optimal Non-Linear Active Seat Suspension
,”
J. Terramech.
,
43
, pp.
97
118
.10.1016/j.jterra.2004.10.003
27.
Sarshari
,
E.
,
Khaki Sedigh
,
A.
, and
Sadati
,
H.
,
2010
, “
Optimal Control of Ride Comfort of a Passenger Car: Comparison Between the Hydro-Active and the Fully Active Suspension Systems
,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2010-01-1913.
28.
Al-Sulaiman
,
F.
, and
Zaman
,
S.
,
1994
, “
Actuator Placement in Lumped Parameter Systems Subjected to Disturbance
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
52
(
1
), pp.
41
47
.10.1016/0045-7949(94)90254-2
29.
Van de Wal
,
M.
, and
De Jager
,
B.
,
1996
, “
Selection of Sensors and Actuators for an Active Suspension Control Problem
,”
IEEE International Conference on Control Applications
.
30.
Van de Wal
,
M.
, and
De Jager
,
B.
,
1998
, “
Actuator and Sensor Selection for an Active Vehicle Suspension Aimed at Robust Performance
,”
Int. J. Control
,
70
(
5
), pp.
703
720
.10.1080/002071798222091
31.
Huisman
,
R.
,
1994
, “
A Controller and Observer for Active Suspensions With Preview
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Eindhoven University of Technology
,
Eindhoven, The Netherlands
.
32.
Muijderman
,
H.
,
1997
, “
Flexible Objective Controllers for Semi-Active Suspensions With Preview
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Eindhoven University of Technology
,
Eindhoven, The Netherlands
.
33.
El-Demerdash
,
S. M.
, and
Crolla
,
D. A.
,
1996
, “
Effect of Nonlinear Components on the Performance of Hydropneumatic Slow-Active Suspension System
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
, Part D (J. Automob. Eng.),
210
, pp.
23
34
.
34.
Bristol
,
E. H.
,
1966
, “
On a New Measure of Interaction for Multivariable Process Control
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
, AC-11, pp.
133
134
.10.1109/TAC.1966.1098266
35.
Skogestad
,
S.
, and
Postlethwaite
,
I.
,
2005
,
Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
Chichester, UK
.
36.
Khaki Sedigh
,
A.
,
2011
,
Analysis and Design of Multivariable Control Systems
,
K. N. Toosi University of Technology Publication
,
Tehran, Iran
.
37.
Ziegler
,
J. G.
, and
Nichols
,
N. B.
,
1942
, “
Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers
,”
Trans. ASME
,
64
, pp.
759
768
.
You do not currently have access to this content.