This paper addresses the boundedness property of the inertia matrix and the skew-symmetric property of the Coriolis matrix for vehicle-manipulator systems. These properties are widely used in control theory and Lyapunov-based stability proofs and thus important to identify. The skew-symmetric property does not depend on the system at hand but on the parameterization of the Coriolis matrix, which is not unique. It is the authors’ experience that many researchers take this assumption for granted without taking into account that several parameterizations exist. In fact, most researchers refer to references that do not show this property for vehicle-manipulator systems but for other systems such as single rigid bodies or fixed-base manipulators. As a result, the otherwise rigorous stability proofs fall apart. In this paper, we list some relevant references and give the correct proofs for some commonly used parameterizations for future reference. Depending on the choice of state variables, the boundedness of the inertia matrix will not necessarily hold. We show that deriving the dynamics in terms of quasi-velocities leads to an inertia matrix that is bounded in its variables. To the best of our knowledge, we derive for the first time the dynamic equations of vehicle-manipulator systems with non-Euclidean joints for which both properties are true.

References

References
1.
Antonelli
,
G.
, 2006,
Underwater Robots. Motion and Force Control of Vehicle-Manipulator Systems
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
2.
Fossen
,
T. I.
, and
Fjellstad
,
O. E.
, 1995, “
Nonlinear Modelling of Marine Vehicles in 6 Degrees of Freedom
,”
Math. Comp. Model. Dynam. Syst.
,
1
(
1
), pp.
17
28
.
3.
Canudas de Wit
,
C.
,
Diaz
,
E.
, and
Perrier
,
M.
, 1998, “
Robust Nonlinear Control of an Underwater Vehicle/Manipulator System With Composite Dynamics
,”
IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Inc. (IEEE), pp.
452
457
.
4.
Schjolberg
,
I.
, and
Fossen
,
T. I.
, 1994, “
Modelling and Control of Underwater Vehicle-Manipulator Systems
,”
Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Marine Craft Maneuvering and Control
, Southampton, UK, pp.
45
57
.
5.
Murray
,
R. M.
,
Li
,
Z.
, and
Sastry
,
S. S.
, 1994,
A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
6.
Sciavicco
,
L.
, and
Siciliano
,
B.
, 2005,
Modelling and Control of Robot Manipulators
,
Springer
,
New York
.
7.
Schjolberg
,
I.
, 1996, “
Modeling and Control of Underwater Robotic Systems
,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering Cybernetics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
8.
Egeland
,
O.
, and
Pettersen
,
K. Y.
, 1998, “
Free-Floating Robotic Systems
,”
Control Problems in Robotics and Automation
, 1st ed.,
Siciliano
,
B
and
Valavanis
,
K. P.
, eds.,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin Heidelberg
, Vol.
230
, pp.
119
134
.
9.
Borhaug
,
E.
, 2008, “
Nonlinear Control and Synchronization of Mechanical Systems
,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering Cybernetics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
10.
Ghorbel
,
F.
,
Srinivasan
,
B.
, and
Spong
,
M. W.
, 1998, “
On the Uniform Boundedness of the Inertia Matrix of Serial Robot Manipulators
,”
J. Rob. Syst.
,
15
(
1
),pp.
17
28
.
11.
Fossen
,
T. I.
, 2011,
Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
12.
Duindam
,
V.
, and
Stramigioli
,
S.
, 2008, “
Singularity-Free Dynamic Equations of Open-Chain Mechanisms With General Holonomic and Nonholonomic Joints
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob.
,
24
(
3
), pp.
517
526
.
13.
From
,
P. J.
,
Duindam
,
V.
,
Gravdahl
,
J. T.
, and
Sastry
,
S.
, 2009, “
Modeling and Motion Planning for Mechanisms on a Non-Inertial Base
,”
Proceedings of International Conference of Robotics and Automation
, Kobe, Japan.
You do not currently have access to this content.