This paper considers the design of input shaping filters used in motion control of vibratory systems. The filters preshape a command or actuation signal in order to negate the effect of vibratory modes. A class of finite impulse response filter satisfying a set of orthogonality conditions that ensure zero residual vibration is introduced. Filter solutions having minimum quadratic gain, both with and without the inclusion of non-negativity (peak gain) constraints, are presented. Unlike impulse-based shapers, the filters have impulse responses with no singularities and therefore automatically remove discontinuities from an input signal. Minimum duration impulse response solutions are also presented. These contain singularities but may also have smooth components. Discrete-time designs can be obtained numerically from system modal parameters, accounting for all modes simultaneously so that convolving single-mode solutions, which leads to suboptimality of the final design, is not required. Selected designs are demonstrated experimentally on a flexible link planar manipulator.

1.
Piazzi
,
A.
, and
Visioli
,
A.
, 2000, “
Minimum-Time System-Inversion-Based Motion Planning for Residual Vibration Reduction
,”
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron.
1083-4435,
5
(
1
), pp.
12
22
.
2.
Sahinkaya
,
M. N.
, 2001, “
Input Shaping for Vibration-Free Positioning of Flexible Systems
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part I
,
215
, pp.
467
481
.
3.
Singh
,
G.
,
Kabamba
,
P. T.
, and
McClamroch
,
N. H.
, 1989, “
Planar, Time-Optimal, Rest-to-Rest Slewing Maneuvers of Flexible Spacecraft
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
0731-5090,
12
(
1
), pp.
71
81
.
4.
Moyoshi
,
T.
,
Noda
,
Y.
, and
Terashima
,
K.
, 2007, “
Feedforward Control Considering Input and States Constraints With Eliminating Residual Vibration
,”
Proceedings of the American Control Conference
, pp.
5005
5010
.
5.
Economou
,
D.
,
Mavroidis
,
C.
,
Antoniadis
,
I.
, and
Lee
,
C.
, 2002, “
Maximally Robust Input Preconditioning for Residual Vibration Suppression Using Low-Pass FIR Digital Filters
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
124
(
1
), pp.
85
102
.
6.
Singer
,
N. C.
, and
Seering
,
W. P.
, 1990, “
Preshaping Command Inputs to Reduce System Vibration
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
112
, pp.
76
82
.
7.
Singhose
,
W. E.
,
Seering
,
W. P.
, and
Singer
,
N. C.
, 1997, “
Time-Optimal Negative Input Shapers
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
119
, pp.
198
205
.
8.
Gürleyük
,
S. S.
, 2007, “
Optimal Unity-Magnitude Input Shaper Duration Analysis
,”
Arch. Appl. Mech.
0939-1533,
77
, pp.
63
71
.
9.
Singhose
,
W. E.
,
Pao
,
L. Y.
, and
Seering
,
W. P.
, 1997, “
Slewing Multimode Flexible Spacecraft With Zero Derivative Robustness Constraints
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
0731-5090,
20
(
1
), pp.
204
206
.
10.
Pao
,
L. Y.
, and
Lau
,
M. A.
, 2000, “
Robust Input Shaper Control Design for Parameter Variations in Flexible Structures
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
122
, pp.
63
70
.
11.
Khorrami
,
F.
,
Jain
,
S.
, and
Tzes
,
A.
, 1994, “
Experiments on Rigid-Body Based Controllers With Input Preshaping for a Two-Link Flexible Manipulator
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
1042-296X,
10
(
1
), pp.
55
65
.
12.
Mohamed
,
Z.
,
Martins
,
J. M.
,
Tokhi
,
M. O.
,
Sá da Costa
,
J.
, and
Botto
,
M. A.
, 2005, “
Vibration Control of a Very Flexible Manipulator System
,”
Control Eng. Pract.
0967-0661,
13
, pp.
267
277
.
13.
Feliu
,
V.
, and
Rattan
,
K. S.
, 1999, “
Feedforward Control of Single-Link Flexible Manipulators by Discrete Model Inversion
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
121
(
4
), pp.
713
721
.
You do not currently have access to this content.