Ground autonomous mobile robots have important applications, such as reconnaissance, patrol, planetary exploration, and military applications. In order to accomplish tasks on rough terrain, control and planning methods must consider the physical characteristics of the vehicle and of its environment. Failure to understand these characteristics could lead to vehicle endangement and consequent mission failure. This paper describes recent and current work at the Politecnico of Bari in collaboration with the University of Lecce in the area of deformable terrain mobility and sensing. A cylindrical mobile robot is presented and its rolling motion on terrain is studied from a theoretical and experimental prospect. A comprehensive model is developed taking into account the interaction of the vehicle with the terrain and the related dynamic ill effects, such as rolling resistance and slip, and it is experimentally validated. An unconventional application of the vehicle serving as a tactile sensor is discussed and experimental results are presented showing the effectiveness of the cylindrical mobile robot in estimating the properties of homogeneous, deformable terrain, which in turn can be used to assess the vehicle traversability.

1.
Halme
,
J.
,
Schönberg
,
T.
, and
Wang
,
Y.
, 1996, “
Motion Control of a Spherical Mobile Robot
,”
Proc. IEEE Workshop on Advanced Motion Control
,
Mie
, Japan, pp.
259
264
.
2.
Bicchi
,
A.
,
Balluchi
,
A.
,
Prattichizzo
,
D.
, and
Gorelli
,
A.
, 1997, “
Introducing the Sphericle: An Experimental Testbed for Research and Teaching in Non-holonomy
,”
Proc. IEEE Intern. Conf. on Robotics and Automation
,
Albuquerque, New Mexico
, pp.
2620
2625
.
3.
Bhattacharya
,
S.
, and
Agrawal
,
S.
, 2000, “
Design, Experiments and Motion Planning of a Spherical Rolling Robot
,”
Proc. Intern. Conf. on Robotics and Automation
,
San Francisco, CA
, pp.
1207
1212
.
4.
Drenner
,
A.
,
Burt
,
I.
,
Dahlin
,
T.
,
Kratochvil
,
B.
,
McMillen
,
C.
,
Nelson
,
B.
,
Papanikolopoulos
,
N.
,
Rybski
,
P. E.
,
Stubbs
,
K.
,
Waletzko
,
D.
, and
Yesin
,
K. B.
, 2002, “
Mobility Enhancements to the Scout Robot Platform
,”
Proc. of the 2002 IEEE Intern. Conf. on Robotics and Automation
,
Washington
, D.C., May 11-15, pp.
1069
1074
.
5.
Xu
,
Y.
,
Brown
,
H. B.
, and
Au
,
K. W.
, 1999, “
Dynamic Mobility With Single-Wheel Configuration
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
0278-3649,
18
(
7
), pp.
728
738
.
6.
Bekker
,
G.
, 1969,
Introduction to Terrain-Vehicle Systems
,
University of Michigan Press
,
Ann Arbor, MI
.
7.
Iagnemma
,
K.
, and
Dubowsky
,
S.
, 2004,
Mobile Robots in Rough Terrain
, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics,
Springer
,
Berlin, Germany
.
8.
Brooks
,
C.
,
Iagnemma
,
K.
, and
Dubowsky
,
S.
, 2005, “
Vibration-based Terrain Analysis for Mobile Robots
,”
Proc. of the 2005 IEEE International Conf. on Robotics and Automation
,
Barcelona
, Spain, April 18-22, pp.
3415
3420
.
9.
Reina
,
G.
, 2004, “
Rough Terrain Mobile Robot Localization and Traversability With Applications to Planetary Explorations
,” Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico of Bari, Bari, Italy.
10.
Janosi
,
B.
, and
Hanamoto
,
B.
, 1961, “
Analytical Determination of Drawbar Pull as a Function of Slip for Tracked Vehicles in Deformable Soils
,”
Proc. of the First Int. Conf. On Terrain-Vehicle Systems
,
Minerva
Tecnica
, ed.
Turin
, Italy.
11.
Reina
,
G.
,
Foglia
,
M. M.
,
Milella
,
A.
, and
Gentile
,
A.
, 2004, “
Dynamic Modeling for a Cylindrical Mobile Robot on Rough-Terrain
,”
Proc. of the 2004 ASME IMECE
, November 14–19,
Anaheim
, CA.
12.
Onafeko
,
O.
, and
Reece
,
A.
, 1967, “
Soil Stresses and Deformation Beneath Rigid Wheels
,”
J. Terramech.
0022-4898,
4
(
1
), pp.
59
80
.
13.
Wong
,
J.
, 1993,
Theory of Ground Vehicles
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.