This paper presents dynamic modeling, controller design, and virtual reality (VR)-based human-in-the-loop real-time simulation for a wheel loader control system. In particular, a loader with electrohydraulic actuation is considered. A detailed nonlinear dynamic model is developed for the hydraulic system and the loader linkage. The hydraulic model includes a load sensing pump, valves, and cylinders. The linkage model represents a two degree of freedom loader with lift and tilt functions. A linear quadratic Gaussian based robust controller is designed for automatic bucket leveling to assist the operator by keeping the angle of the bucket leveled while the boom is in motion. The closed-loop control system design is tested with a nonlinear model in a real-time VR simulation. In the VR simulation, the operator interacts with the model using a joystick input. The loader linkage geometry is displayed to the operator in real time using a VR display. The controller performance was assessed in the VR environment. As expected, the controller was found to provide a significant improvement in the accuracy of the bucket leveling, particularly in the case of a novice operator controlling the linkage motion. While prototypes cannot be eliminated, the VR simulation combined with realistic physics and control dynamics provided a useful tool for evaluating hydraulic systems and controls with less reliance on prototype machines.

1.
Tafazoli
,
S.
,
Salcudean
,
S. E.
,
Hashtrudi-Zaad
,
K.
, and
Lawrence
,
P. D.
, 2002, “
Impedance Control of a Teleoperated Excavator
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
1063-6536,
10
(
3
), pp.
355
367
.
2.
Salcudean
,
S. E.
,
Hashtrudi-Zaad
,
K.
,
Tafazoli
,
S.
,
DiMaio
,
S. P.
, and
Reboulet
,
C.
, 1999, “
Bilateral Matched-Impedance Teleoperation with Applications to Excavator Control
,”
IEEE Control Syst. Mag.
0272-1708,
19
(
6
), pp.
29
37
.
3.
DiMaio
,
S. P.
,
Salcudean
,
S. E.
,
Reboulet
,
C.
,
Tafazoli
,
S.
, and
Hashtrudi-Zaad
,
K.
, 1998, “
A Virtual Excavator for Controller Development and Evaluation
,”
Robotics and Automation Proceedings
, vol.
1
, 16–20 May, pp.
52
58
.
4.
Buzdugan
,
L.
,
Balling
,
O.
,
Lee
,
P.
,
Balling
,
C.
,
Freeman
,
J. S.
, and
Huck
,
F.
, 1999, “
Multirate Integration for Real-Time Simulation of Wheel Loader Hydraulics
,” DETC99/VIB-8253,
ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
, Las Vegas, NV.
5.
Jelali
,
M.
, and
Kroll
,
A.
, 2003,
Hydraulic Servo Systems: Modelling, Identification and Control
,
Springer
, London.
6.
Zhang
,
R.
,
Aleyne
,
A.
, and
Prasetiawan
,
E.
, 2002, “
Modeling and H2∕H∞ MIMO Control of an Earthmoving Vehicle Powertrain
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
124
, pp.
625
636
.
7.
Fales
,
R.
,
Spencer
,
E.
, and
Kelkar
,
A.
, 2004, “
Robust Control Design for a Construction Machine Using LQG and H∞ Based Methods
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434 (submitted).
8.
Merritt
,
H. E.
, 1967,
Hydraulic Control Systems
,
Wiley
, New York.
9.
Burl
,
J.
, 1999,
Linear Optimal Control
,
Addison–Wesley
, Reading, MA.
You do not currently have access to this content.